Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Films which you can see were intended to be deep and meaningful but were just crap

Citizen Kane

Can't believe how this film regularly makes it into the top 5 of the best ever lists. Pioneering in terms of cinematic effects - maybe... apart from that, SNORE
At last! Someone who feels the same about this turgid, pretentious crock of shite!

I know a film buff who said Welles nicked a lot of the effects from earlier films btw.
 
Anyone seen the recent french film > Heartbeat Detector ? seriously dodgy plot involving corporate culture and genocide, didn't convince. Also crap viewing in UK with subtitles ruining what was supposed to be the climax of the film.

Good performance again from Mathieu Amalric but doesn't stop the film sinking.
Oh god yes, that really sucked. It sounded interesting in reviews and it started off ok for the first 20/30 mins, but then it got incresingly pretentious and incoherent, and in the end it was just tedious. One of the most disappointing films I've seen for a long time.
 
Maybe 'say' is the wrong word. 'Provide a new way of looking at' would be better - all art should do that.

debated whether or not to respond for a while, realised the possible futility in either and decided to krishnamurti it for my own entertainment.

first i'd like to apologise for what i'm about to say, it's long and probably pointless.

lately i've found myself seeing less and less i percieve as new.
i ask is this maturity, is it because i think a lot, am i becoming jaded, broadening my horizons, learning, depressed, enlightened, losing imagination?.. and many other questions.

i imagine it may be a common thing anyway, i am 22 and have not seen a new perspective (which i've not imagined or used) in any art bar andy kaufman for six months.

the rate at which i've felt like i've seen something before is multiplying, to a point at which i have started just to appreciate things that provide one of the ways of looking which i prefer.

END OF BULLSHIT

anyway donnie darko was entertaining but crap.
not sure if the film makers set out to make it deep meaningful, but a lot of people who i know thought it was, and they were tossers.
it's hard to type irony but... and i was way more depressed than any of those farts who thought it was.
 
lately i've found myself seeing less and less i percieve as new.
i ask is this maturity, is it because i think a lot, am i becoming jaded, broadening my horizons, learning, depressed, enlightened, losing imagination?.. and many other questions.

i imagine it may be a common thing anyway, i am 22 and have not seen a new perspective (which i've not imagined or used) in any art bar andy kaufman for six months.
I commend to you a semi-defunct artistic form: books. Due to the lack of budgetary constrainst they tend to represent a much wider range of perspectives than films.
 
I commend to you a semi-defunct artistic form: books. Due to the lack of budgetary constrainst they tend to represent a much wider range of perspectives than films.

i retract my previous statement, you sir/madam are right. i should have said apart from books.... i genuinely thank you.
i do read a bit, used to a lot til i became incredibly lazy. anyway thanks again. good advice.
 
donnie darko was entertaining but not in any way "deep". The weirdo spooky sci-fi/fantasy aspect of it was very weak.
 
This weekend I spent 5 and a half hours watching 1900 and concluded it was one of the worst films Ive seen in sometime. Considering the on screen talent (De Niro, Depardieu) they treated the subject matter with no sympathy, with a complete lack of insight and with little character development. Rubbish.
 
Back
Top Bottom