FridgeMagnet
Administrator
It's one of those perennial issues. I went to a really good exhibition last year on the subject of "can colour help street photography?" - http://www.somersethouse.org.uk/about/press/press-releases/cartier-bresson-a-question-of-colour - and there were a lot of pictures there which just wouldn't have worked without colour, because the big hit of the picture involved colour (not luminance) contrast. There were some amazing pictures by Saul Leiter and Helen Levitt. On the other hand there are loads of pictures around where colour is just distracting.I read somewhere that a photo has good composition if it's a good photo in b&w; ie, it doesn't rely on the shock of color. I agree with that generally, although sometimes, the pleasure of color can make for nice photos, too.
A lot of it in the early days was technology of course - the only high speed films were B&W, with colour you might be stuck with Kodachrome at ISO 64. Nowadays every camera takes colour pictures at the same speed as B&W and it's purely an artistic decision.



























