Discussion in 'football' started by Lazy Llama, Jul 12, 2017.
The highest score this week was 98 when i looked.
Took a 4-point hit to bring in Sterling, Firmino and Lingard. So far, all I've got from it is a Lingard yellow card
If you were looking in the h2h then it would have taken the 4 points I spent on transfers off my score.
What was your final score then ?
STERLING ISN'T EVEN STARTING!!
But you know who is? Jesus, who I got rid of for Firmino
Fuck. This. Game.
98, but I spend far too many points on transfer all the time to be using these diminished scores, I prefer to gloat about the total without considering points spent on transfers!
I can live without Sterling and Loftus-Cheek on this occasion, surprised I havent suffered more from squad rotations yet so I consider this to be getting off lightly.
Dont know what to do about Kane, suppose I shall probably buy him back now even if he doesnt play straight away. Oh dear I am too greedy regarding double-gameweeks so shall probably end up spending 12 points on transfers in order to have 2 spurs and 2 west ham players.
The before tax approach
I do keep track of my taxes eventually though 180 points spent on transfers in my first season, 320 last season (wtf!), 116 so far this season including the 12 that I have just spent for next gameweek.
at man city
All things considered, given the City players other teams around me had and I didn't, that probably worked out ok for me
Was a bit worried at the end that Otamendi's clean sheet was going to be fucked with that last minute penno Not more than my mate who captained him, though
I managed to find another 4 or 5 transfers I could do on top of the 12 points I already spent in preparation for tomorrows gameweek so I played my wildcard and saved the points.
A question , I have a west ham player that i want to bench v west brom but play against spurs.. So Will he stay on the bench for the spurs game or is he included automatically ?
The two matches are both part of the same gameweek, so you can't change things between matches - basically, he's either on your bench for both matches or plays both matches.
Why would you want to bench someone against WBA but play them against Spurs?
Because i wanted to risk a man city midfielder v watford, who may score more than the west ham player's total for both games. Spurs let in goals at home too.
Why not just leave Ogbonna as first sub then if KDB doesn't play, he comes in for both matches? If KDB is fit, he'll start. There's no way he's coming off the bench for a few measly points, IMO.
I forgot to attend to my team. Kane is on my bench.
You'll have him playing no worries. In fact, you already have.
No Salah, Coutiniho or Firmiho toady for Liverpool .
I dropped them
I got rid of Salah and Firmino but I got in Vardy and he isnt playing either.
Looking like a shitshow of a week so far. Three non-starters and an injury doubt - Pope currently my highest scorer on 2.
I've managed to luck out a bit - Lingard and Wilson both scored, picking up valuable points with big hitters out. Whether I'm still happy about those Lingard points will depend how well Arnautovic does in his two matches this week, as that's the swap I was going to make.
Kane will come in thanks to Salah's no-show, but pretty sure I'll still wish I captained him Just how pissed off I'll be depends how well VC Sterling does. Didn't start the last match...
This may well be true of your work h2H but unless sterling starts and scores about 10 goals you're surely going to lose the U75 one.
Work is a traditional league, not H2H. I don't pay so much attention to the u75 H2H these days, already a lost cause
Good luck to those who have hopes pinned on some kind of something special for this week, yesterdays football was somewhat inconclusive about how this week is unfolding so far. The lineups starting to come out in just over 10 minutes will probably have an impact on how confident people feel about this.
I got off to a good start with Mahrez yesterday but I just aint sure about this one, the potential is there but the potential is also there for quite the dud.
Separate names with a comma.