Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Faith No More vs Nirvana

fookin ell

  • Faith No More

    Votes: 31 38.3%
  • Nirvana

    Votes: 50 61.7%

  • Total voters
    81
Well, it depends on what's meant, as you said earlier, groups that are mile apart are dragged under the umbrella. I can't see the similairity in groups like say Tad or Alice and Chains, beyond them both being guitar based. All depends on what we mean by the term and who it covers.

For me, 'grunge' really meant a sort of raw, punky, garagey sound infused with metal. Alice and Chains, Soundgarden, etc didn't fall into that at all. Grunge for me was epitomised by Bleach, and most of Mudhoney's stuff.
 
For me, 'grunge' really meant a sort of raw, punky, garagey sound infused with metal. Alice and Chains, Soundgarden, etc didn't fall into that at all. Grunge for me was epitomised by Bleach, and most of Mudhoney's stuff.

I'd go along with 'raw, punky, garagey sound' but it's the metal bit i have the problem with. All the original Seattle bands namechecked Sabbath sure, but they never ever sounded anything like them. I think the metal bit was added later by people trying to jump on the cash-wagon, an attempt to get metal (or soft rock)bands reassigned to a more lucrative genre.
 
Hmm. They could be great (e.g. Down in a Hole, Would?) and they could be overindulgent cack (e.g. Godsmack).

I liked 90% of their output - Godsmack included!

:)


"Unplugged" is one of my all-time fave albums - raw, moving, affecting - just fucking great.
 
Faith no more 1 nirvana 0...simply because they weren't that original but thanks to steve albini aka big black and then nirvana producer..who suddenly sounded like an extension of "songs about f**king" note the ** as the I don't want this flagged whilst posting....)

There was rumors that insectide was totally steve albini output re badged... and considering that I have big blacks album I concur to the "oververtly" familar sound...except he did it with them big black over 10 years earlier...

Faith No more..yes mike patton is excellent his output is superb and diverse compared with one trick wonder one sound over and over nirvana...no contest...
 
Sorry slainte but nothing Nirvana ever recorded sounded anything like Songs about fucking - even at BB's softest and Nirvana's rawest. Never even close.
 
Faith no more 1 nirvana 0...simply because they weren't that original but thanks to steve albini aka big black and then nirvana producer..who suddenly sounded like an extension of "songs about f**king" note the ** as the I don't want this flagged whilst posting....)

There was rumors that insectide was totally steve albini output re badged... and considering that I have big blacks album I concur to the "oververtly" familar sound...except he did it with them big black over 10 years earlier...

Faith No more..yes mike patton is excellent his output is superb and diverse compared with one trick wonder one sound over and over nirvana...no contest...

dont be absurd, Nirvana were totally original and deserve all the praise they (eventually) got. They *exploded* from the Seattle scene, putting it on the map.
 
...and this is just as wrong. But with more historical ignorance.


The scene was burgeoning with lots of bands but Nirvana put Seattle on the map. I was into all that music at the time, and Nirvava may have been preceeded by a few bands but they exploded out of that 'scene' and were the biggest band of that scene too no doubt.
 
Well, you're wromg on that as well, but i was referring moe to "Nirvana were totally original" - maybe they were the first ever bass/guitar/drum band to write about personal issues in a mildy agrresive way. It's up in the air really isn't it?
 
Back
Top Bottom