Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

'Fairytale' censored - is nothing sacred??????

William of Walworth said:
Spot on.

'The Phoney 'War on Christmas' " -- why 'Christmas being banned' stories are made up media bollocks

Do read the above link dessiato, maybe learn the meanig of the words 'media scepticism', and cotton on. Or do you prefer to believe what you want to believe? If the latter, there's plenty of myth-manufacturers making up sensationalist shite about 'PC' out there in the right wing/Tory media who're delighted to oblige you.

You're a bit of a gullible idiot aren't you? :rolleyes:

Good link, WoW. Thing is, having lived amongst Muslims for 10 years as neighbours, I know for a FACT that my Muslim neighbours sent Christmas cards (note, 10 years experience here)! They also give little presents too! Their kids willingly go to Christmas parties, and give out invitations to their neighbours' kids be they Christian background or Jewish background to Eid celebrations! And another thing, get this, they also respect and revere Jesus (Isa) and Mary (Maryam) too!
 
sam/phallocrat said:
THey just announced on R1 that they're not gonna censor it after all, loads of complaints apparently . . .

Hadn't picked up on this. Good outcome, because the original decision was idiocy.

But the u-turn will probably still serve to convince the anti-'PC'-ranters of their own rectitude and will probably still somehow fuel their obsessions. Wankers.
 
Pie 1 said:
William, shut up, yeah?

YES BOSS!!!!!! :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Your default reaction to the PC thing is just as :rolleyes: tbh.

Surely 'imo'? ;)

Feel free to outline exactly why my position is 'just as' bad as that of myth-recyclers and gullible want-to-believers of Littlejohnesque tabloid bollocks.


Like Oliver Burkeman (not as well as him tho' :o ) my aim is to counter myths and lies. 'PC'-obsessives are spreading them. Those two positions 'just as bad' eh? Hmmmmm ....

I appreciate my determination might get somewhat wearing, but you'd be hard pushed to argue logically that I was wrong on the substantive issue. And it's not as if I haven't agreed that the original BBC decision was idiotic

I am shutting up now, but only because I've ran out of time, not because Sergeant-Major Pie-1 is ordering me to ...
 
Pie 1 said:
OK, IMO, yes.

At least you admit it's all a bit wearing :p

I'm one person, posting part time on one bulletin board. These 'PC' myths/stories get everywhere and far too many people believe them.

What's more important, and what's 'just as' bad?

I really am away now.
 
William of Walworth said:
:rolleyes:

Take your 'humour' back to the Golf Club to share with some Telegraph and Express reading Tories, you braindead arse.

Too stupid to see that bluestreak was (in part) taking the piss out of YOU? :D :p

We have a Jim Davidson-wannabe in our midst ...


Err Will, I suspect Dessiato was being just a little tongue-in-cheek. :)
 
Thing is WoW, historically your position is untenable - PC did exist, it was called as such, and while it was mainly a beast of US college campuses, some of it's central diktats did spill over to much of the English speaking world.

If they'd focussed on the 'Hey, speak and treat people with a little bit of respect' (which was basically what it was about) instead of attempting to alter the language 1984-stylee it wouldn't have gotten the bad press, but as usual in anything like this there were zealots who had to take things one step too far and turned the whole thing into a moral crusade.
 
That makes sense, K_S.

William's 'anyone that uses the phrase PC is an idiot' stance doesn't sit entirely easily with me, either.
 
By the way, I understand that Chris Moyles is leading the campaign to have it as Christmas no.1. This being the same Chris Moyles who just happen to be the main man at Radio 1.

So clearly this is one big PR stunt for Chris Moyles' ego :rolleyes:
 
NVP said:
That makes sense, K_S.

William's 'anyone that uses the phrase PC is an idiot' stance doesn't sit entirely easily with me, either.

You'd struggle to find very many people at all who use the phrase nowadays, who were not at the very least guilty of ultra-derivative cliche recycling though. And usually worse.

My point, while overrepeated on these boards ( :o ) and (admittedly, this time) overdone and no doubt annoying to some, is that the entire phrase has become politically discredited.

I'm the first to agree that the BBC have acted like arses in this instance, although some have suggested (and I want, conspiranoidly, to agree! :p ) that it was largely a publicity stunt got up by Chris Moyles.

Neither do I deny that if you look around, especially a few years ago, you will find some instances of over zealous/misguided officials in public organisations who have attempted to introduce, or actually have introduced, counterproductive (and stupid/annoying/idiotic sounding) changes to language. Often for reasons of pre-emptive (and imagined) offence-avoidance, in so many cases when no offence is likely to exist in reality.

But I still contend that the vast majority of 'PC gorn made' sensationalism in the tabloids is made up bollocks -- my link to that Oliver Burkeman Guardian article about the Phoney War On Christmas, that I posted earlier on, is pretty devastating to anyone imagining that a Brigade of Politically Correct Apparatchik-'liberals' is 'going round' trying to 'ban' or 'censor' Christmas.The real truth in that article about the 'Winterval' thing in Birmingham (1998, 9 fucking years ago -- but some people still think they still call it that there!!) is interesting, and set out in detail in that article. As deconstruction of that myth, and several other 'banned Christmas' ones, it's among the best hatchet jobs I've read.

But these myths are too readily believed by too many and that's my problem.

I really do think that people who unthinkingly recycle the 'political correctness' phrase while showing no sign of questioning the truth or detail of what they've been told in the media, or heard in some secondhand pub anecdote, ARE gullible idiots.

I don't exactly disagree with what kyser has posted, as a short historical point. But by now, and for several years, the whole 'PC' phenomenon has been overblown, exaggerated, sensationalised, subjected to Littlejohnesque outrage from some very dodgy voices politically, and believed undersceptically and underquestioningly by far too many people.

Would like some other time to Google to see where most (UK) instances of the 'PC' phrase (and variants) occur online. (Maybe the BBC apart, who will usually be quoting other people anyway I reckon). Would not be at all surprised, and I speculate admittedly, were I to find that most media people and commentators who (seriously) use and promulgate the phrase are complete wankers politically as far as anyone to the left of Genghiz Thatcher is concerned. That's certainly my experience over the past 10 years. And that's why I'd rather eat my own vomit than use the phrase (seriously/non pisstakingly) myself.

And it's such a fucking cliche anyway! Ridiculously overused. Come on!

Makes it much harder to properly engage with/oppose/ put up sensible arguments against the real cases of over zealous decisions that are sometimes made, when there's a media and public chorus of 'this is all PC gone mad' chuntering away in the background.
 
Not in to censorship and this case is silly. I remember hearing something by Eminem in my local independent shop years ago which actually was the most homophobic unpleasantness I've heard for a long time 'Boom bye,bye' aside.
 
I have to agree with WOW here, in that anyone who uses the term "PC gawn mad!!", is stooping to intellectual laziness, and IMHO has forfeited their opinion in the argument already.

This is in my biased HO anyway. :o
 
William of Walworth said:
Useful link, I've bookmarked that for future reference.

When people fall for this concerted media campaign, I find it's counter-productive to shout at them for being "stupid". (I've spent enough time in publishing to have an incredibly cynical approach to media content, but not everyone has.) Articles like that one are more helpful. :)



Oh dear, I've been shanghaied to the music & festies forum. Help! :eek:
 
Don't get me wrong, I find the PCGM brigade as annoying as WoW, but his argument is that PC doesn't exist, when it has a long history.

The equivalent around here is the continued use of the term 'yuppie'...
 
As I'm sure you see above, I haven't outright denied (not in the post above, anyway** ;) ) that something describable by clichemongerrers as 'PC' has existed, and indeed I totally accept some language tinkering has been counterproductive/ridiculous/infuriating.

**I have admittedly made past posts saying 'PC' doesn't exist and is no more than made up media contrivance and lies. Too crude perhaps. Instead, I'd now modify that to say that the predominant public impression of what they imagine 'PC' to be, is derived in large part from made up media bollocks

What I mainly object to to is the far more infuriating flogged to deathness and cringeworthy clichedness of the 'PC'-phrase used so widely to describe it. A phrase that has become devalued and discredited through lazy, derivative overuse (IMO anyway, and surely in the O of any thoughtful person who values accuracy).

I also take issue with the Daily Mail-land notion that there's a concerted Brigade of wiberal 'PC Police' illiberally 'going round' imposing enforced 'gone mad' language changes, 'banning' things and 'censoring things. I'd say that that minority of changes that are worth spending time criticising/opposing (as opposed to made up Littlejohn style storm in teacup made up bollocks and trivia) are far more haphazard, far less universal as any kind of threat.

I'll save for another time developing my wild theory that the media furore over 'PC' is itself largely responsible for many of the more stupid 'PC' initiatives -- public officials are quite well capable of being unimaginative and media-gullible too -- they see constant references in 'PC' stories in the media to minorities being 'offended', this gradually/indirectly influences them drip by drip (because almost EVERYONE is in some way is influenced by the predominant media climate), they end up at least in part believing it, and end up doing something pre-emptively to try and avoid some imagined offence.

No? Too insane? Too conspiranoid? :o :p
Well there might just be something in it ... ;)

Anti-'PC' obsessives on the other hand, elevate to the status of bravery, 'free speech', 'speaking their mind', their 'right' and ability to be as insulting and casually (or deliberately) insensitive towards other peoples' sensitivities and differences as they want ... all in the name of 'defying' some scarcely existent, imagined gang of 'Liberal PC Brigade' oppressors.

Hear the phrase beginning 'I know it's not very 'PC' but ...' and 97% of the time you can expect some utterly thought free, shop worn, idiotic piece of tedious arsery :rolleyes:
 
White Lotus said:
When people fall for this concerted media campaign, I find it's counter-productive to shout at them for being "stupid". (I've spent enough time in publishing to have an incredibly cynical approach to media content, but not everyone has.) Articles like that one are more helpful. :)

Yeah but I'm not very 'PC'** about certain categories of gullibility and stupidity <**shoots self> ;) :p :D

The frequent counterproductivity of my intemperence over all this I do plead guilty to. Reasons why I lose it from time to time though : see above.

Thanks for your time ...
 
Back
Top Bottom