Well that's another matter entirely. Although to be fair it wasn't just "the board". Quite a few regulars avoided the coach on most of it's outings.
Can I ask why you object so much?
Also and I've probably got this wrong but you don't have to a member to travel. It just means you'll get it cheaper
If anyone actually cares, the trust didn’t decide to start running coaches off their own back. They have taken over the risk and effort from others. And its wrong that now those that supported those efforts when they didn’t now have to pay more than members of their trust.
But its up to them what they choose to do.
So you would rather the trust didn't run the coaches? Thus meaning that fans who find it vital so they can get to certain away games are forced to pay more and use public transport.
What a working class hero you are...
Oh and by the way the line highlighted in bold can be interpreted both ways, I'd just wish you didn't try to put the coach travel down. Simply just don't use it!
You can take the boy out of Essex, but you can't take Essex out of the boy!And I don't like the working class!
Defiantly? is that the Trust sticking the proverbial two fingers up in the direction of B.I.G ?The Trust will defiantly be running a coach to this game. Times and pricing to follow ...

Defiantly? is that the Trust sticking the proverbial two fingers up in the direction of B.I.G ?![]()

Generally so do I...shit, we actually agree on something?I disapprove when people make jokes at spelling, but this one made me laugh. Sorry![]()

.... I'll stick to defiantly! Seeing as it brought you both together