Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Explain the attraction of Jazz please....

ViolentPanda said:
You have a point. :)

Mind you, at least "acid jazz" waas slightly jazz-based, jazz-funk (well, most of it) wasn't jazz, and it certainly wasn't funky!

Uhm. 'Dominoes' by Donald Byrd? 'Places And Spaces'? 'You And The Music'?. Admittedly this music is usually placed under the term of 'fusion' but this is FUNKY!!!!!

BB:)
 
Boogie Boy said:
Uhm. 'Dominoes' by Donald Byrd? 'Places And Spaces'? 'You And The Music'?. Admittedly this music is usually placed under the term of 'fusion' but this is FUNKY!!!!!

BB:)

it's shit. See also Lonnie Liston Smith, Roy Ayers, yadda yadda yadda
 
eoin_k said:
There are similar links between Jazz and Jamaican music. Listen to compilations like Soul Jazz records' 100% Dynamite and it is hard to deny the influence American music including Jazz on some of Jamaica's finest musicians.


so what? i'm sure we've covered this: liking something doesn't mean you have to like its influences, that's an absurd standpoint.

and to be fair, your post was fairly condescending so I can see why jbob posted what he did
 
Boogie Boy said:
Uhm. 'Dominoes' by Donald Byrd? 'Places And Spaces'? 'You And The Music'?. Admittedly this music is usually placed under the term of 'fusion' but this is FUNKY!!!!!

BB:)

Yeah, but when I mention "jazz-funk", I'm talking about that quintessentially British musical movement that served up to us the delights of Light of the World, Shakatak, Maze, Beggar and Co and other anaemic, emetic musical dross. ;)
 
NinaSimoneIndianStyleBLkonGOLD.jpg


Nina wondered what the keyboard Jockeys' beef with her music was. But she didn't loose her cool. If the cats didn't dig her sound, she could live with that.
 
Dubversion said:
so what? i'm sure we've covered this: liking something doesn't mean you have to like its influences, that's an absurd standpoint.

and to be fair, your post was fairly condescending so I can see why jbob posted what he did

why are you backing up someone overreacting so vitriolicly ?
The post only comes over as condescending if read with that in mind, so it says more about those reading it and interpreting it as such than the person who wrote it.
 
danny la rouge said:
Do you like David Axelrod, 8ball?

Have only heard the name - my knowledge of jazz isn't good but different bits always sound so different it surprises me it's all one genre. I find it hard to hear a common thread between, say, Nina Simone (which incidentally I like) and Jamiroquai (which incidentally I don't), and ragtime (which I'm not sure is jazz but my mate insists it is).

Some of it seems to overlap heavily with blues too.
 
Loupylou said:
why are you backing up someone overreacting so vitriolicly ?
The post only comes over as condescending if read with that in mind, so it says more about those reading it and interpreting it as such than the person who wrote it.

Or, if eoin k had read the thread and realised that his assumptions were misplaced, his beginners guide to jazz and its influence upon popular music wouldn't have come across as quite so condescending. The point being that several people, including myself, had merely taken the piss out of some elements of jazz, but had not trashed the entire genre (and indeed had praised substantial parts of it).

Tbf, the OP is ridiculous anyway; exchange the word 'jazz' for 'rock', 'country', 'classical', etc, etc and you have a whole heap of superfluous threads about genres of music that incorporate very broad characterisitics, feed into one another, and cannot be pinned down to specific 'explanations' for their relative merits. The only real answer is to dabble and see if there's any bits you like.
 
jbob said:
exchange the word 'jazz' for 'rock', 'country', 'classical', etc, etc and you have a whole heap of superfluous threads about genres of music that incorporate very broad characterisitics, feed into one another, and cannot be pinned down to specific 'explanations' for their relative merits.

I find it a bit easier to find the common threads in something like rock, but then it's a genre I'm more familiar with so I probably just have more of an 'ear' for it.

Genres are funny things.
 
Loupylou said:
why are you backing up someone overreacting so vitriolicly ?
The post only comes over as condescending if read with that in mind, so it says more about those reading it and interpreting it as such than the person who wrote it.

hang on :D

jbob's post isn't vitriolic at all, for fuck's sake :)

a bit sarky, that's about it..

Perhaps the post only comes over as vitriolic if read with that in mind, so it says more about those reading it and interpreting it as such than the person who wrote it. :p
 
Dubversion said:
it's shit. See also Lonnie Liston Smith, Roy Ayers, yadda yadda yadda

Of course I disagree with you Dub, during my time on these boards it has become clear that we have few points of common interest musically. C'est la vie.

BB:)
 
ViolentPanda said:
Yeah, but when I mention "jazz-funk", I'm talking about that quintessentially British musical movement that served up to us the delights of Light of the World, Shakatak, Maze, Beggar and Co and other anaemic, emetic musical dross. ;)

Maze described as dross? Light of the World described as dross? Shakatak described as dross?

Shocking. Absolutely shocking.

BB:eek:
 
Boogie Boy said:
Maze described as dross? Light of the World described as dross? Shakatak described as dross?

Shocking. Absolutely shocking.

BB:eek:

So you agree with "anaemic" and "emetic", then? :D :D
 
Dubversion said:
hang on :D

jbob's post isn't vitriolic at all, for fuck's sake :)

a bit sarky, that's about it..

Perhaps the post only comes over as vitriolic if read with that in mind, so it says more about those reading it and interpreting it as such than the person who wrote it. :p

I'd spent the a.m dealing with the legal profession................I rest my fucking case. :mad:



No-one's mentioned Charlie Parker yet :confused:
 
Back
Top Bottom