Students having to pay their top-up fees used to work in agricultural jobs, but have been ousted by cheap labour, so many are on the dole for the summer (a cost deflected from the food bill to taxes).
Stephen Gash said:Like the NHS needs cheap nurses? The whole labour market is a mess. We import nurses from places like the Phillipines yet 3600 British trained nurses leave every year to go to Australia. Why bother with the expense of training them?
Students having to pay their top-up fees used to work in agricultural jobs, but have been ousted by cheap labour, so many are on the dole for the summer (a cost deflected from the food bill to taxes).
Now this is where the problem lies Stephen. Half of London's homeless are reportedly from Eastern Europe. Which report?Half of London's homeless are reportedly from Eastern Europe, what about that cost? Immigrant workers are living many to a house, not reflected in the council tax for that house. What is the cost for that? It is not as simple as saying "cheap food". The social costs and economic costs rarely enter the equation.
The trouble is we have allowed sensible discussion to be dissipated and replaced by a polarised bellowing match.
On the question of England's borders, we naturally will retain the integrity of England
The questions about Cornwall and other English counties applies equally to other parts of the UK,

A quick reply then I've really got to be off
http://www.24dash.com/news/1/12523/index.htm
Now the obvious response will be to shoot the messenger, but that doesn't help. A sensible immigration policy should be drawn up on need, not on crude market forces.
Stephen Gash said:Immigration. Our policy is a points system similar to those in Canada and Australia.
As we favour a move out of the EU into EFTA (subject to the English electorate's approval) the open door policy for EU members would become defunct.
Where immigrants were required to fill posts then obviously they would be welcomed. This would mean a return to the sensible policies of pre-EU immigration.
FYI I voted to remain in the European Common Market in the only referendum we have had on what became the EU. The only other political party I have been a member of is the Social Democrats Party. I voted against merger with the Liberals, because in my experience self-styled liberals have a list as long as your arm of all the things they wish to ban.
Top of the banning list is free speech. Next on the list is democracy.
The SDP would have been a real force now in my opinion if it had held its nerve. Instead it became a very ordinary party which has gained the reputation among other parties, for applying the dirtiest electoral tactics. Anybody remember the bogus Plaid Cymru website which appeared during the 2001 elections campaign? Now which party put up that site? Anybody remember?
spend those election resources in England instead. But we can't ban you so have a nice election, you'll almost certainly lose your deposits.
That far I would agree on. I think it is a sound principle. But then you charge off the point here. Stick to a principle rather than hunting the myriad degrees of hypocracy you are bound to find in other politicians:Stephen Gash said:Our goal is a federal UK with full national parliaments. Once achieved anything after is a matter for England.
The questions about Cornwall and other English counties applies equally to other parts of the UK, most notably the Shetland Islands, here all the oil is. So Alex Salmond had better think twice before coming down to Cornwall to talk about its status within England if he doesn't want reciprocal questions asked about the Shetlands. well, that's only fair isn't it?
The English were never asked about devolution. We never let the screaming genie out of the bottle... Yes we all now have to live with the consequences.

Yeah exactly. I mean the sensible thing is to get elected in England, then simply overun Wales and take what you wantlewislewis said:And of course restricting your candidates to England would be a big bonus![]()


Idaho said:Yeah exactly. I mean the sensible thing is to get elected in England, then simply overun Wales and take what you want
![]()
Idaho said:I believe there is nothing more artificial and anhistorical than attempting to revert to some old imagined border. The point in history one chooses for such a border says everything about your current intents and principles and has zeor historical significance.
, the border existing nowadays should be based on people's consciousness, rather than some historical anomalies. If we're rearranging the UK based on history then crikey, we've got some work to do. For starters, didn't all of Ynys Prydain belong to the Welsh? Do they not know about Caerleon? Newport's contribution to Welsh industry? The GLC? Nathan Blake? St. Cadoc?The poet W.H Davies of Pillgwenlly?
Geoff Hoon said that Englishness could perhaps be taught in English schools during the World Cup. He agreed that Britishness would only be taught in English schools.Idaho said:What does this 'ramming' actually amount to? Could you give some concrete (ie. non-tabloid headline) examples?
Hardly comes close to qualifying as a 'ramming'. Sounds like the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland don't feel that they have any place to sanction or direct any notion of English nationalism (be it a benign form or otherwise).Stephen Gash said:Geoff Hoon said that Englishness could perhaps be taught in English schools during the World Cup. He agreed that Britishness would only be taught in English schools.
That's ramming Britishness down English children's necks as far as I'm concerned.
Stephen Gash said:Here's the Questiontime debate about "Britishness" starts about 39.15 mins in and the point about "Britishness" being taught only in English schools at 45.45 mins
http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_6300000/newsid_6301700/6301717.stm?bw=bb&mp=wm
ddraig said:a fucking ukip towable billboard was outside county hall in Cardiff today giving it 'vote ukip and abolish the Welsh assembly'odious cunts
![]()
Why so cross about it? It's called democracy. A strange system where people are actually allowed to have opposing views believe it or not.Idaho said:Why so cross about it? It's called democracy. A strange system where people are actually allowed to have opposing views believe it or not.
can be cross about whatever he chooses. If I saw the BNP holding a demo, for instance, I'd be miffed - wouldn't you? Even if I recognised their right to do so.