Dirty Martini
gets what he cant want
I've always rated McClaren.
Kanda said:Where were you on Saturday?![]()


He had a good 30 minutes on the ground and a strong game in the air, but vs. two very disappointing markers did he do anything Crouch couldn't have achieved?Leeloks said:He had a good game again alongside every other player.
xenon_2 said:Don't think anyone's getting carried away though. The Russians might have made mistakes but they're a half decent team. Just nice to see Heskey and Owen working together well again, as they've done in a previous era. Doesn't make sense to break that up. Crouchcan always be brought on if needed.


Notorious J.I.M said:Barry is finally getting the recognition he deserves and about time. It's criminal he was overlooked by Sven for so long when the likes of Jenas and Richardson amongst others kept getting caps. Can't wait for the visit to Man City on Sunday to see him give Sven a gentle reminder of his talents!![]()

Fingers said:Thas has to get him past ah Micah first ah kid.![]()
Barry played as a holding midfielder, what has that to do with Jenas or Richardson?Notorious J.I.M said:Barry is finally getting the recognition he deserves and about time. It's criminal he was overlooked by Sven for so long when the likes of Jenas and Richardson amongst others kept getting caps. Can't wait for the visit to Man City on Sunday to see him give Sven a gentle reminder of his talents!![]()
London_Calling said:He had a good 30 minutes on the ground and a strong game in the air, but vs. two very disappointing markers did he do anything Crouch couldn't have achieved?
London_Calling said:He had a good 30 minutes on the ground and a strong game in the air, but vs. two very disappointing markers did he do anything Crouch couldn't have achieved?
As for Russia, I thought the defence might be approx. Premiership quality given its defensive record and the manager but that wasn't the case, at least not tonight.
How many times did the Russian forwards hold and turn on the edge of the England area . . . not great. Had the Ref given their goal, had one of those three chances between the 45th and 50th minutes gone in . . . . . I think people are getting a little excited about beating a mediocre team that was set up wrongly for 45 minutes and never recovered.
Leeloks said:You are trying to find any point to get out of the fact that you were totally wrong in your predictions for this match. Get over it.

ChrisFilter said:I think it's brilliant![]()

London_Calling said:Whoa, I think I've only ever made the one prediction. But coupled with the refusal to bow at the media-led shrine of Emile Heskey and . . . this occurs.
Just a little bit overblown, chaps.
So the idea is to go with the irrefutable logic that England won so Heskey must have been the right choice. I do love a tabloid world, everything is so uncomplicated.
London_Calling said:He had a good 30 minutes on the ground and a strong game in the air, but vs. two very disappointing markers did he do anything Crouch couldn't have achieved?
Ned Pointsman said:The other striker isn't there to play foil to prince michael, queen of our hearts the little welsh twat, he's supposed to be able to score goals too, at no point in the past two games did heskey ever look like doing that. He looked exactly like the heskey of old, without the falling over every two minutes.

Balbi said:Please recognise the difference between a forward and a striker, and the necessity to have a pair of these to maximise the effectiveness of the attack.
Thanks.
![]()
Termite Man said:Why are people even mentioning crouch . From his performance as sub last night I reckon andy Johnson would be a better option than fucking crouch !
London_Calling said:Whoa, I think I've only ever made the one prediction. But coupled with the refusal to bow at the media-led shrine of Emile Heskey and . . . this occurs.