Flashman said:
True, other teams bottle it too. So if all the teams who usually bottle it, bottle it again, then they won't win it, we won't win it and Brazil will win it.
/negative cunt
Did Brazil bottle in 1998? Many claim they did.
To win the World Cup first of all you need talent - the team with the most talent is neraly always the most liekly to win unless hoplessly mismanaged or unbalanced (and before anyoen says anything whilst England could be a little more balanced and Sven's yet to show he's a genius at inetrnational managment, England are still neither of these), but you also need a little bit of luck.
Since 1966, England's record is:
1970: went out to Germany AET after being 2-0 up, also gave evntual winners Brazil their toughest game.
1982: went out undefeated in 2nd round with a record W3 D2 L0 (including a good win against Platini's France who in fairness should of been in the final and a draw aginst Germany who were the team that robbed France in the smei-final)
1986: Went out 2-1 to eventual winners Argentina in the QF led by Maradona to an illegal goal and a fntastic goal
1990: wnt out in semi-fnal on penalties to eventual winners Germnay
1998: went out to Argentina on penalites in QF afte having a perfectly good golden goal disallowed.
2002: Went out 2-1 in QF to evntual winners Brazil, in what was probably the toughest match Brazil faced in the whole tournament.
We've just not had the luck, it may sound like an excuse, but it isn't because I'm not saying we necessarily deserved the luck.
As for bottle, I would of liked to of seen more self-belief against brazil in 2002, but whilst I'm not of the school of thought that says it's a waste of time to pactice penalites, winning a penalty shoot-out is more luck than anyhting else.