Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

End of truce in Palestine

Rach: Post your sources on Qassam fatalities. Look, the numbers don't matter for the point I was trying to make. You say 20 deaths, fine, so thats one fatality for every 225 rockets fired or 4 per year. The point that I was making, and that you didn't address, is that firing into palestinian civilian areas is not going to stop the rockets and, if anything, will forment more hatred. How many palestinian civilians have been killed in Israeli attacks targetting the qassam infrastructure? This is a basic risk/benefit assessment, do you attack Gaza knowing that civilan casualties are likely and that even if you do succeed the 'leader' of the qassam brigades will be replaced quickly? Or do you realized that chasing after a relatively minor threat with that kind of high risk and low reward is pointless? Of course, I'm quite confident that the Israeli Generals know this but act as they do regardless.
 
Ethnic cleansing by bulldozer, ethnic cleansing by artillery barrage, all in the Zionist hymnbook.
 
Moono: It is a lie that Israel is leaving the "West Bank" in 2008? Please clarify.

TAE: You obviously have no knowledge of military matters. Artillery is programmed. It is not WWII. 7 seconds is not nearly enough time.

As for the IDF investigation, they have released the films that are taken with every Israeli strike. Hate to disappoint you but Israel is innocent on this one. I who always counsel patience and make rational thought my mantra had all but convinced myself that Israel had killed the beach goers. Turns out I of all people was wrong. It was actually HAMAS. I am sure, now that the truth is coming out that HAMAS will remain strangely silent. Besides the mine fragments, the lack of a crater, and logs kept by the IDF, the films and still photos [time dated as well] all prove Israel's case.

Gray: I managed to bring my paperwork on Qassams today so I will post the fatality list, etc.

I] 06/28/04: Afik Zahavi, aged 4 in S'derot. Killed just as he arrived for kindergarten, accompanied by his mom who was herself badly wounded and is now parapalegic. This marks the first recorded fatality in Israel Proper.

II] 06/28/04: Mordechai Yosopov, aged 49 in S'derot. Killed outside his job in an industrial park a short while after the first victim.

III] 09/29/04: Yuvai Abele, aged 4, in S'derot. Playing under an olive tree with his young friend, they were both killed in a direct hit.

IV] 09/29/04: Dorit Aniso, aged 2, killed in the above incident.

V] 12/14/04: Jit Tapp, aged 19, in Negev, Thai Guest Worker killed while on holiday from agricultural job in Ganei Tal.

VI] 01/21/05: Ayala Abukasis, aged 17, in S'derot. Walking with her much younger retarded brother they heard the 20 second warning alrm going off but were unable to find cover. she threw herself over her brother to shield him and was killed from the shrapnel of a nearby hit. Her brother was only slightly injured.

VII] 07/14/05: Dana Gelkovitz, aged 22, in Moshav Netiv Ha'asara in Negev. the collective farm where she lived did not enjoy the protection provided by early warning systems employed in large population centers like s'derot and Ashkelon. She was killed by a direct hit while walking between buildings on the farm.

VIII] 03/28/06: Sala'am Ziadin, aged 59, outside of Nachal Oz. Killed, with his son, when they inadvertantly set off a buried qassam that had not detnoated in a previous strike.


IX] 03/28/06: Khalid Ziadin, aged 16, same attack listed above. Son of the previous victim.


As I said, 9 killed in Israel Proper. In Gaza however there are at least 8 other Israelis, a Chinese Guest Worker, and 2 recorded "Palestinians." There are at least 18 "Palestinians" as well counted separately since the previous 2 were in an Israeli "Settlment" working when killed.

As for the claim that fieing GUIDED missiles at the Qassam infrastructure will not help impede Qassam trafffic, nonsense. It has proven its effectiveness. Just citing the case of the armed clan, up the road from the beach incident, who last month chased a Qassam team from the area so as to try and avoid any confrontations with Israel is proof positive. To prevent even one launching is to claim success. Israel prevents a whole lot more. You do not think neutralising a Qassam cache or workshop is worth the effort? Preventing hundreds of missiles from being assembled and fired?

By your logic, Israel should dl nothing since it is futile if one hopes to neutralise all threats posed by the Qassam. On the contrary, one Israeli life saved meabs the world.
 
rachamim18 said:
TAE: You obviously have no knowledge of military matters.
That is correct. :)

rachamim18 said:
Artillery is programmed. It is not WWII. 7 seconds is not nearly enough time.
Can you explain why 7 seconds is not nearly enough time?

rachamim18 said:
As for the IDF investigation, they have released the films that are taken with every Israeli strike. Hate to disappoint you but Israel is innocent on this one.
Why would that disappoint me? :confused:

rachamim18 said:
It was actually HAMAS. I am sure, now that the truth is coming out that HAMAS will remain strangely silent. Besides the mine fragments, the lack of a crater, and logs kept by the IDF, the films and still photos [time dated as well] all prove Israel's case.
My problem is this: How do I know that the IDF is not lying? There have been at least two court cases involving UK citizens where the IDF's initial version of events was (after many months) shown to be completely incorrect.

One thing would help me: Can you link to a bunch of cases where the IDF put their hand up and voluntarily published the fact that (a) they had messed up or that (b) a soldier had behaved in a criminal way?
 
The IOF version, the obligatory 'hasbara' version, has already been discredited by independent experts and witnesses. The attempt to wriggle has not gone unnoticed in the world's press. Doubts are now cast on other IOF 'explanations' for Palestinian deaths.
 
moono said:
The IOF version, the obligatory 'hasbara' version, has already been discredited by independent experts and witnesses.



Define better what you mean by "independent"?

Are they "independent" and "objective" or "independent" and "subjective"?

Because, it seems to me, that one side is trying its best to avoid blame, and the other is trying its best to place blame.

Under such conditions, it is extremely unlikely that the truth will prevail, whatever it is.
 
astronaut said:
Define better what you mean by "independent"?

Are they "independent" and "objective" or "independent" and "subjective"?

Because, it seems to me, that one side is trying its best to avoid blame, and the other is trying its best to place blame.

Under such conditions, it is extremely unlikely that the truth will prevail, whatever it is.
It is true that there are very few people involved who have no vested interest one way or the other. But the israeli courts seem to be quite happy to hit the IDF over the head at the moment, so a non-military report by israeli investigators could make interesting reading.
 
TAE said:
It is true that there are very few people involved who have no vested interest one way or the other. But the israeli courts seem to be quite happy to hit the IDF over the head at the moment, so a non-military report by israeli investigators could make interesting reading.



I'd also like to see a truly independent report (if such a thing was possible), and if there is room for indictment, then that should happen. My feeling though is that it would be for 2nd degree manslaughter rather than 1st degree murder.

I also feel that, considering the prevalence of rocket attacks on Israel, civilians are always going to be caught in crossfire - it's a non-brainer to say that civilians will be killed under such conditions - so rather than blame the IDF solely, a truly objective person would equally blame the people firing rockets in the first place.
 
Enough with the Dumptyism;

Saeb Erekat, the chief Palestinian negotiator, accused the Israelis of a cover-up. "The Israelis should have admitted what they did and apologised. They know who did it and we know who did it. They want to escape responsibility because it was a severe embarrassment to the military at home and the prime minister when he is abroad. The pictures followed him to Europe," he said.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,1797065,00.html

Oh yeah.
 
rachamim18 said:
As for the claim that fieing GUIDED missiles at the Qassam infrastructure will not help impede Qassam trafffic, nonsense. It has proven its effectiveness. Just citing the case of the armed clan, up the road from the beach incident, who last month chased a Qassam team from the area so as to try and avoid any confrontations with Israel is proof positive. To prevent even one launching is to claim success. Israel prevents a whole lot more. You do not think neutralising a Qassam cache or workshop is worth the effort? Preventing hundreds of missiles from being assembled and fired?

By your logic, Israel should dl nothing since it is futile if one hopes to neutralise all threats posed by the Qassam. On the contrary, one Israeli life saved meabs the world.

Preventing a qassim attack would be a success, but this method of prevention also kills many innocent people, so it's not. If it were, Israel should just go straight ahead and execute the population of Gaza as an effective means to prevent attacks.

The mob you describe who rid their area of a group of militants were probably doing so out of fear and grief caused by this style of prevention. The example you cite only happened because that group of Gazans were so badly terrorised, that's not effective prevention.

Neutralising a load of weapons is worthwile, of course it is. But aiming missiles onto a busy street isn't neutralising, it's indescriminate killing. There must be another way, it can't just be a choice of this and doing nothing. I'm sure you agree, one life saved means the world, whether it's an Israeli life or a Palestinian.
 
Moono: "B'tzelem makes it 7." Well I provided names, dates, locations, and incidents. I would venture that B'tzelem is wrong [as they often are]. For starters, they omitted the father and son Bedua who were killed just this past March.

Qassams fired in reprisal." If Israel does not fire missiles "in reprisal," what logic does a non sqanctioned milita use? In fact, Human rights Watch, certainly no friend to Israel, calls the Qassams "illegal under International Law." Maybe you might want to think about that before you ofer a blanket defence.

TAE: "Why is 7 seconds not enough time." Besides the painter having to radio in the info, and a supervisor digesting it, the artillery would have to be reprogrammed. I mean, taking that into account, it is simply common sense.

"Why would TAE be disappointed." It seems to me that you get joy out of painting Israel nefariously. Am I being too sensitive?

"How does TAE know that the IDF is not lying." Well, on one hand you have the state army of a sovereign nation, providing films, physical evidence, and forensic evidence, and on the other hand you have illegal entities claiming that Israel is commiting genocidal acts. Using the past as a reasonable barometer for these militants verison of truth, we can see that they fabricate and lie at every turn.

Look at Jenin. Arafat, then the head of the PA, went on international television and claimed that when the smoke cleaered the world would see "thousands" of dead "Palestinian" men, women, and children. When the smoke finally did clear, Arafat remained silent.

This is certainly not to say that Israel never lies. However, when the world is staring at it, and it is providing physical evidence to back its claims, I would say that smart money will be on Israel.

The only physical evidence that the militants have is three pieces. I] A computer generated blood test result showing that ine victim had been there in a time period that COULD have coincided with the time in which Israel WAS firing its 6 shells in that DIRECTION. II] the blood test is backed by a hand written hospital log showing that the same patient arrived in the time period represented by the blood test result. III] A piece of shrapnel, containing an artillery fuse, offered by one victim to hospital authorities.

Items number I and II can EASILY be fabricated even by amateurs, and item III can be from anywhere . The beach and surrounding area have been the frequent target of IDF artillery since that is the area wwhere most Qassams are launched. In fact, as I believe I stated, an IDF operation took place on that same beach less than 2 weeks before this incident!


"There have been cases in the UK where Israel maintained something adamantly and then later on changed their tune." Of course you mean the Hundall Case. Generally, investigators worldwide do not like to be pressured into revealing preliminary findings because they very well could be wrong, partly wrong, and so on. The Hundall family, paticularly the mother, pressured Israel into revealing what it knew every step of the way. Thus, Israel offered one piece but that piece was then deemed inconsequential, etc. That is natural during an investigation.It has nothing to d9o with veracity.


"Can I link to a bunch of cases where the IDF volunteered that it had done wrong." Actually, I can. I will not do so now but if you wish I will provide a couple of links to cases where the IDF admittted mistakes, as well as prosecuted wrongdoers. the fact is, Israel is a nation like any other. It has good people, and it has bad people. the government is not infallible. all these things mean that there will be, from time to time, unfortunate eventualities. When this is clearly the case, Israel owns up.

Mr. Hundall is but one case. there is the famous case of ISraeli border Police being charged with dozens of crimes perpertrated aginst Arabs, by several different personel. there are other cases involving IDF who have also abused Arabs. this happens in every army but I offer that on a per capita basis, the IDF has a much better record than any other armed force in an armed conflict.
 
Moono: "Independant experts have discredited the IDF version." Actually Moono, only one has tried. Human rights Watch claims an American who has worked in Kosovo identifying ordnance for the organisation has claimed it highly improbable that the IDF was not responsible for the strike. Forgive me if I question that man's neutrality.

Funny you used Erakat. If you feel like having a good laugh, review his comments during Jenin.


Astronaut: IF Israel were responsible, and it is not, it would not warrant even Manslaughter. It was a standard militart operation, using preprogrammed artllery [except for the marking shell which HAS been accounted for]. There is no negligence unless you count a family choosing to bathe in a war zone as negligent on their part, as well as the militants for firing Qassams from a residential area, and the PA being negligent in not following its mandate by preventing the launchings...Hmmm...On second thought there IS a whole lot of negligence!
 
Rachamim;
Moono: "B'tzelem makes it 7." Well I provided names, dates, locations, and incidents. I would venture that B'tzelem is wrong [as they often are]. For starters, they omitted the father and son Bedua who were killed just this past March.

You clearly didn't even bother to check the link. All the details are there. In fact, it's probably where your details originated.

It's you that's 'wrong', as per normal. Here, take another look;
http://www.btselem.org/English/Statistics/Casualties_Full_Data.asp?Category=6&order=DeathDate
 
Back
Top Bottom