billythefish
toad licker
Alas, the Toyota Prius has a relatively high Carbon Footprint, despite its alleged low emissions. There is a wealth of hi-tech lightweight materials, technology and batteries that take masses of energy to build, it is imported from Japan, has an expected life span of ten years max, and is a pig to dispose of when it's dead.
The vehicle with the lowest carbon footprint by far is the Land Rover Defender... built in Solihull largely by hand, most components are sourced from 150 mile radius, uses simple materials, 75% of all ever made (since 1948) are still running, easy to re-cycle when they do die as they're built of aluminium (and most components just get reused on other vehicles)... and its emissions are no-where near as bad as some may think anyway.
4x4 bias is just inverted snobbery.
The vehicle with the lowest carbon footprint by far is the Land Rover Defender... built in Solihull largely by hand, most components are sourced from 150 mile radius, uses simple materials, 75% of all ever made (since 1948) are still running, easy to re-cycle when they do die as they're built of aluminium (and most components just get reused on other vehicles)... and its emissions are no-where near as bad as some may think anyway.
4x4 bias is just inverted snobbery.
No need to be ashamed, they are considerably better than most Jags/Beamers/Mercs or even Mondeos in terms of CO2. My point was they are no better than a lot of run of the mill Fiestas and Clios and the likes- and should be treated similarly tax wise (perhaps in the £115 band)