butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Do you like men running into brick walls and forgetting both the ball and their brain on evidential, empirical, or what basis?
?????play-offs don't occur until September/October time??? monday/friday/what??
rugby league is a great game and i get so annoyed by naysayers such as yourself.




no, am simply reacting to bone-headed criticism of a game that i love. bollocks to a 'dying' game, its the largest growth sport amonst s/e school children for eg. league is where its at maaaaaaannnnnnn!![]()
.They've already been doing just that behind the scenes i believe.
If he couldn't do League, i.e. the joke version, there's no way he'll be able to handle Union.
You're right. We're witnessing the leagueification of RU. What is bizarre is that union doesn't need fixing. Bumper crowds, bumper TV audiences, more marketability than ever before, more money flowing through the game than ever before; growing in reach and numbers every year across the board from developed to developing nations.
What's even odder is the fact that *no* union fan wants the ELVs, few players or coaches want them (Graham Henry and Gatland off the top of my head - I'm sure there are many more) and few national unions (with the exception of the fucking Aussies) want them. So why the fuck are the IRB kowtowing to the bloody ockers when the latter are evidently trying to change the laws of the game to suit the fact that they are shit scrummagers and are the only union currently losing ground to their league counterparts?
As for the changes, some rules are ok, such as not being able to kick straight for touch from a pass back into your 22, some rules are marginal, such as uneven numbers at the lineout (I don't understand what this would do, or why) and some are plain shite, such as collapsing mauls, allowing handling on the deck and awarding the team who doesn't take the ball into a ruck a free kick if the ball becomes unplayable.
I don't watch any S14, but apparently there's a lot more tap and goes, the ball is in play for longer, but then there are a lot more scrums in the last quarter as players get to tired to really open up.
It does seem that the inevitable outcome of that will be a depowered scrum and far more identikit players of a similar size and build, and less of the physical extremes (such as good old Adam Jones style props or Ian Evans style second rows) which make union so unique and so great (IMO)


League is better. Simple.
A: Their are almost twice as many tackles and hits in league as in Union. Averaging over 300 a game against 100-150 a game respectively.
B: The ball spends between 10 and up to 25 minutes longer in play in League matches than in Union.
C: League is a fast paced hard hitting brutal and brilliant game contested by people like Andy Farrell and Leslie Pepsicola, both of whom have been exposed for the talentless shite they truly are when called upon to play god's own game
D: Union is contested, in this country, by ruddy faced overweight private school boys, slowly... and is followed by tossers (this is not prejudice this is fact![]()

I know which i prefer!
I know. It's a total ball killer's charter.
What's interesting for me is that as a Welshman, my team would probably have more to gain than most from the ELVs. We're pretty shit scrummagers, haven't a clue how to maul or how to defend against them, and frequently come off worse at the breakdown. We also have a load of props, such as Rhys Thomas, who are rubbish scrummagers but fantastic in the loose, and could be converted into highly successful ELV-era front row forwards quickly and easily. (The likes of Sheridan or Adam Jones would be the first to go).
It would give us a pronounced advantage over teams like England or the Saffas, at least for the first few years after introduction.
Still don't fucking want them, though![]()
League is better. Simple.
A: Their are almost twice as many tackles and hits in league as in Union. Averaging over 300 a game against 100-150 a game respectively.
B: The ball spends between 10 and up to 25 minutes longer in play in League matches than in Union.
C: League is a fast paced hard hitting brutal and brilliant game contested by extremely fit and resiliant athletes.
D: Union is contested, in this country, by ruddy faced overweight private school boys, slowly... and is followed by tossers (this is not prejudice this is fact
I know which i prefer!
So you don't think it's a bit one-dimensional? In union it's necessary to work an opening, in league it just seems to be break a tackle and leg it.
No, i agree it is a simple sport, which is why I like it. Union has it's tactics and strategy and I appreciate that. But I prefer watching League because I prefer watching fast, exhilarating sport, I like watching tackles and tries, not standing around with hands on hips!
League was designed to be more exciting, and is. IMhumbleO.
Sheridan's better than you might think in the loose, and Stevens is in awesome form at Bath - his offloading is quality. Still, take your point, Wales' strengths are in open field - amongst the usual suspects Byrne is maturing nicely and Williams has jumped up to truly world-class, a shoe-in for the Lions. The law changes would certainly hurt England quite a bit - but perhaps we might actually give the backs a proper shot once in a while? There's some quality in there, but they only get the ball as a last resort.
I think you've altered this. I was almost too stupid to notice because I like league and not 'God's own game' (!!!!). Jason Robinson? Leslie Vainikolo?

