ChrisFilter said:I live just round the corner.. but my rent is pretty cheap, oddly cheap.
ditto. i live in west dulwich.
no tube = cheap rent
the village is like wierd bit of surrey plonked in south london. but i like it.
ChrisFilter said:I live just round the corner.. but my rent is pretty cheap, oddly cheap.
Minnie_the_Minx said:Out in East Dulwich last night, it struck me that, overall, East Dulwich does not appear to sport a particularly good-looking populace. Not as bad as Nunhead, obviously. But there is a grimy, potatoey sheen to most of the people you see on the streets of SE22. Now, I’m no Adonis myself. But there’s no doubt the inhabitants of some other areas of town are more consistently pleasing to the eye. On the Kings Road or on Battersea Rise, for example, the overall radiance of passer-bys – male and female – is high. Islington, too, isn’t bad.
So is there a best looking borough? And why are some better than others? Is it just wealth or youth?![]()
I thought I'd got uglier since I moved to SE London from Battersea. I blamed the stress of moving.

Dan U said:ditto. i live in west dulwich.
no tube = cheap rent
the village is like wierd bit of surrey plonked in south london. but i like it.
secretlondon said:Is that a new place? This was about 5 years ago and just seemed to specialise in coffee.
marty21 said:i agree on the weird surrey village bit

ChrisFilter said:Seems to be quite a few SE21 Urbanites.. more than I thought, that's for sure.

ChrisFilter said:I'm from West SE21, Thurlow Hill.. I can probably spit on SE27 if I want, but I won't, because I really like Tulse Hill. It's really friendly and villagey feeling.

RubyToogood said:I don't think it's even Surrey, it's Hampshire!

marty21 said:no tube in stoke newington - doesn't translate into cheap rent as far as i can tell

niksativa said:The thing about Dulwich is it is 'owned' by some earl or whatnot, and he has complete control as to what goes on in the village, what shops are allowed, etc. For example shops are not allowed to sell cans of beer in Dulwich village: only bottles, by decreee of the aristos!


ChrisFilter said:I doubt we fit the standard SE21 profile![]()
Dan U said:It's a charity btw, and has been since 1619 set up on the back of the estate gifted by Edward Alleyne. He was an actor, not a Lord as well.

corporate whore said:That Dulwich College is a registered charity is a bit of a shocker.. it owns the freehold of pretty much everything from Half Moon Lane to Dulwich Plough![]()
Rollem said:might have been said, but isnt the horniman in forest hill?
Skim said:East Dulwich is ok, but the village is horrendous – one of those area in London which desperately wants to be in the countryside. I'm thinking Barnes, Hampstead, Blackheath – all insufferably twee places. No real shops, just some overpriced gourmet deli and an organic baby clothes emporium.
Clapham and Battersea do have their posh bits, but they're nowhere near as smug as Dulwich Village...
ChrisFilter said:decent places to eat out.
It's not a place I'd think of eating out in.
corporate whore said:That Dulwich College is a registered charity is a bit of a shocker.. it owns the freehold of pretty much everything from Half Moon Lane to Dulwich Plough![]()
Skim said:Where are they then? The only places I've seen in DV are the Pizza Express and that pub which does nice meals. Maybe there's a load of hidden restaurants I've never seen...It's not a place I'd think of eating out in.
I must find that old-fashioned sweet shop I've heard about, though...![]()

Dan U said:the pub in the village has changed hand's recently.
it's finally changed it's menu in 3 years of living in the area and got loads more decent beer in![]()
Skim said:Where are they then? The only places I've seen in DV are the Pizza Express and that pub which does nice meals. Maybe there's a load of hidden restaurants I've never seen...It's not a place I'd think of eating out in.
I must find that old-fashioned sweet shop I've heard about, though...![]()