there's something about Amanda Palmer that unsettles me.
Which is the kind of "Cult of Amanda Palmer"
like in this video:
at the end of the (quite enjoyable) vid there's a big spiel about how twitter liberates art by allowing artists direct contact with their audience, thus allowing Amanda Palmer and some arty mates to make a "guerilla video" in half an hour on the beach. But it doesn't take into account the people there simply being big Amanda Palmer fans, it's not an level playing field encounter between different people and at the end there's shots of Palmer being hoisted aloft as some sort of icon by the fans. For them, it's just a chance to see an idol for free - and unexpectedly get to be in a vid. And the blurb gleefully announces nobody was paid.
Meanwhile it furthers the career of... Amanda Palmer. Who does get paid
Somehow it's not the democratising tool Palmer genuinely thinks it is.
Does that make any sense?