Epona
Radar 2006-2020, Sonic 2006-2022, Jakey 2007-2024
Except that the series is going to get better. Trustthedyslexic1 said:To early to tell hit or miss?

100% reckoning hit

Except that the series is going to get better. Trustthedyslexic1 said:To early to tell hit or miss?


Episodes four and five will be two-parter (special effects at end of four meant to be best in series), nine and ten (similiar story to part four with spacecrash- scareist story allegedly) and then the final two episodes discussed in other Dr Who thread.Wowbagger said:They're not all single-parters. In fact, I've heard it said that (contrary, of course, to what the production team thinks) the next *three* episodes should probably be considered the first story proper: in part one, the Doctor meets Rose, in part two, he takes her to the future for the first time to see the end of the world, and in part three, he takes her to the past for the first time, something which would previously have required three seperate 90-minute stories and now, because they've got rid of most of the padding (and almost every story in the classic series was padded out somewhere), they can do it in 3x45 (for comparison, that's as long as it took JN-T to tell The Two Doctors). Just because they've gone back to using single episode titles doesn't mean they've dropped multi-part stories altogether, just that it might be a bit harder to work out for yourself which episodes stand alone and which form a longer story.




madzone said:OK badly acted then, fuckwit
And before you claim to have a boggling mind make sure you have all the equipment you pedantic little shit for brains.

<staggers dazedly away from computer>madzone said:That's quite funny for you Kosh - getting better.![]()

editor said:I like the fact that most Americans wil probably hate Dr Who.
LMFAO!Stigmata said:On Newsnight Review the only one who couldn't see the point in it was Bonnie Greer. Says it all really.



Major Tom said:I wish that one day - though - a doctor who could be made which doesn't have to be limited by what's acceptable for children to watch.


That site was recommended by Addict, who knows his shit. No adding to spam lists, I'm 99.99% sure of that.DeusIrae said:Hmmm mmmm. sounds a bit dodgy to me. where's the catch?
Oh I see I have to put in my e-mail and will get spammed to death... Or have it used to *send* spam.
No thanks.
Edit: oh putting mine in is optional, but I'd still have to put in maya's... who would prolly then get spammed to death... or have it used to send spam.
