I'm confused by you CR. You say you are against the occupation of the WB and Gaza but you won't say how this can be achieved and seem to argue the toss with those of us who come out quite clearly against it. You appear to be arguing for arguments sake, (sonny Jim

)
So, how else will it be achieved other than by (in this country at least) public opinion demanding Israel fulfil its UN obligations and withdraw its military and settlers from the OTs?
(Third time I've asked you)
Don't you talk to me about the amount of times you've asked a question because if you recall the only reason you're asking this question is to avoid having to answer the question I originally gave you!
But, for arguments sake, in very simple terms, my "plan for peace", in no particular order, would be as follows:
1. A full Israeli withdrawal to '67 borders (or slight deviations if these can be agreed)
2. Complete evacuation of all settlements not prepared to live under Palestinian law/sovereignty
3. All Palestinian refugees in the diaspora given the opportunity to move to the new Palestinian state in new settlements built with funds from the international community/Israel or settlement evacuated by Jewish settlers
4. Golan Heights/Shebaa given to Syria/Lebanon respectively (should go a long way to also help resolve the situation in Lebanon)
5. Jerusalem to fall under the joint sovereignty of Palestine and Israel with equal access for all faiths/nationalities
6. The new Palestinian state in Gaza and West Bank be allowed to become fully viable by having full control over borders, foreign policy, energy supply/resources etc and economic sustainability underpinned by mass investment from the West/Israel
And now for the controversial part! Well, it's the part that will make you and Garfield see red mist, but the reason for it's inclusion (I could have left it out to avoid an argument) is because one of the main reasons Israel gives for occupying West Bank is security. Now I don't believe that any more than you do (the occupation is for the settlers). However, the above is not guaranteed to stop attacks against Israel, indeed some militants have said they won't stop attacking even if the above is agreed, so any peace plan must be agreed by Israel or it won't ever come into play, so in order to ease Israeli security fears:
7. If Israel feels the need, and should the economic investment create an environment where it would not be detrimental to the new Palestinian state, then borders between Israel and Palestine could be closed for a certain cooling off period (a "Channel Tunnel" style passage to be built between Gaza and West Bank to allow free movement between the two sections)