Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Does your country require an armed force?

Does your country require an armed force?


  • Total voters
    54
Sub_bass said:
I think you'll find that the last time the UK(england) was successfully invaded was 1066 mate...

_sub_
i think you'll find you're wrong.

have you never heard of william iii and idly wondered why james ii fled the country?
 
guinnessdrinker said:
if they were not unsuccessful, why did you vote to get rid of the armed forces?
because the last successful invasion was 317 years ago, when james ii was overthrown and william iii installed. unless you count the temporary occupation of a couple of small islands in the second world war as a "successful invasion". i'm only counting ones which changed the government of the country.
 
The Glorious Revolution is pretty irrelevant to this debate. That happened despite the fact there were armed forces, because James started kacking his pants.
 
Pickman's model said:
because the last successful invasion was 317 years ago.
why?

Because all the invasions since have been unsucsessful? Napoleon Bonaparte for example may well have invaded Britain at some point if we hadn't helped spain. WHile he did get his arse kicked by the russian weather i don't think that without additional enemies it would have crippled his empire permanently
 
Bob_the_lost said:
Bollocks, you know it too :p

That the argentine army was inferior to that of the UK is not in doubt. But that they are more dangerous than footie fans isn't. Footie fans don't typically have 7.62 machineguns, airsuport and a large navy.

Yeah, but those Argies would have fled when they saw 300 fat, bare chested cockneys running towards them lobbing patio chairs and pint glasses.
 
mmmSkyscraper said:
Yeah, but those Argies would have fled when they saw 300 fat, bare chested cockneys running towards them lobbing patio chairs and pint glasses.
Quite possibly, tell ya what, let's disband the military and then see how long it takes another falklands situation to occur? One of the major factors that led to the invasion were the military build down in the area.
 
Bob_the_lost said:
Because all the invasions since have been unsucsessful? Napoleon Bonaparte for example may well have invaded Britain at some point if we had helped spain. WHile he did get his arse kicked by the russian weather i don't think that without additional enemies it would have crippled his empire permanently


we did help spain, a little affair known as the peninsular wars where a certain Arthur Wellelsley honed his skills gained in india.

IIRC Napoleon also planned to invade britain but was unable to do so due to his navey being not as good as the royal navy

to quote Admiral Jervis's , "I do not say, my Lords, that the French will not come. I say only they will not come by sea"

anyhow


as you were
 
costa rica got rid of its army to do away with the threat of an armed coup does have a rather tooled up police force though :)
 
Pickman's model said:
i think you'll find you're wrong.

have you never heard of william iii and idly wondered why james ii fled the country?

...I stand corrected. As far as kingswapping goes, that sort of shit happened all the time amongst the european nobility -even our present royal family is german ffs.

Still not five invasions though, is it?

_sub_

...The only thing i have ever idly wondered about with regards to the nobility is whether or not exile is too lenient for them... :p
 
Gavin Bl said:
Someone had a crack at it in 1940 mind you.
Did Hitler have plans for an invasion then? I think not....

I voted for They're a necessary evil, but for defence only, not for the resource grabbing it is used for nowadays. Actually with the exceptions of the few times it's been attacked, that's all it's been used for, and we aren't likely to be attacked anytime soon.
 
mmmSkyscraper said:
Yeah, but those Argies would have fled when they saw 300 fat, bare chested cockneys running towards them lobbing patio chairs and pint glasses.

...Until the 'argies' realised that's all our crack squad of chair-chucking knuckledraggers could do...

Chunky millwall fan salsa anyone? ;)

_sub_
 
Sub_bass said:
...I stand corrected. As far as kingswapping goes, that sort of shit happened all the time amongst the european nobility -even our present royal family is german ffs.

Still not five invasions though, is it?

_sub_

...The only thing i have ever idly wondered about with regards to the nobility is whether or not exile is too lenient for them... :p
1572 - french land at scarborough
1588 - spanish armada
1688 - glorious revolution
1715 - the old pretender
1798 - french land at ballina
1940 - channel islands
 
sleaterkinney said:
Because hitler wanted to destroy Britians Air Force, there were no plans for an invasion however.
Think you'll find that was in anticipation of a sea and land attack. Had to control the skies, to control the seas, to then control the land :)
 
Hollis said:
Lichenstein ain't got an army either...

And I can provide a link. :cool:

Yeah, but Lichtenstein probably couldn't muster a fucking brigade of soldiers, let alone a three-forces army!!

Did Hitler have plans for an invasion then? I think not....

So the planned operation Lionheart is in fact a myth created by teachers, history books and TV documentary makers and Hitler wiping out the RAF had nothing to do with removing any possible threat to an invasion force trying to cross the channel?
 
See the link i posted.....


"Hitler wanted Sea Lion to be over by mid-September. His naval chiefs believed that any invasion could not start until mid-September! Raeder supplied a list of reasons why the invasion could not go ahead before mid-September1940 (clearance of shipping lanes of mines, getting invasion barges ready etc) and he won the support of the army. Hitler ordered that as long as Germany controlled the sky, Operation Sea Lion would go start on September 15th 1940. Therefore, the invasion depended entirely on whether Göering's Luftwaffe could defeat the RAF. The failure of the Germans to defeat the RAF had to lead to the cancellation of Operation Sea Lion which was announced on September 17th 1940."


Seems the Battle Of Britain changed these plans!
 
does switzerland even have a full time army. i know loads of people get their gun out and head off for training a few weeks a year.

not having a navy probably saves on the defence budget as well.
 
fubert said:
does switzerland even have a full time army. i know loads of people get their gun out and head off for training a few weeks a year.

not having a navy probably saves on the defence budget as well.

I thought they spent their time guarding the pope don't they?

I vaguely remember reading this in 'Sum of All Fears' that centuries ago the Swiss Army were fearsome hard mercenaries and there was some kind of convention to stop them being hired and they were moved to the Vatican to look after il papa...I'd assume they have some form of full time army tho, cos otherwise why build the knives?:D
 
Pickman's model said:
1572 - french land at scarborough
1588 - spanish armada
1688 - glorious revolution
1715 - the old pretender
1798 - french land at ballina
1940 - channel islands


...Sorry, i thought we were talking about successful invasions here (i.e. ones that ended up with permanent changes of government -or the land being physically occupied by an enemy force for longer than four years). :p ;)

...and come on, the channel islands is a bit fucking spurious considering they aren't even part of mainland britain and were nearer occupied france...

...Oh yeah, and the armada sank...

...ballina was in ireland the last time i looked...

...The 'glorious revolution' was more like a coup detat than a bona-fide invasion considering the fact that william was initially welcomed with open arms...

...Oh yeah, and the old pretender:
In reality, the revolt failed abysmally - principally because of Mar's indecisive leadership - and James (who had landed on the Scottish coast after the battle) fled back to France. Further rebellions were attempted in 1719 (defeated at Glenshiel) and throughout the 1720s. Eventually, however, James settled peacefully in Rome...

...any more unsuccessful invasions of the uk? Or is that it? ;) :D

_sub_
 
sleaterkinney said:
Because hitler wanted to destroy Britians Air Force, there were no plans for an invasion however.

No. For an invasion to have had any chance they needed air superiority. Goering was given the task of achieving that and failed.
 
Back
Top Bottom