bluestreak
HomosexualityIsStalin’sAtomBombtoDestroyAmerica
London_Calling said:Nah, Wet Sham have been let off lightly again . . .
and what punishment did spuds receive over their dodgy dealings in 1994?
London_Calling said:Nah, Wet Sham have been let off lightly again . . .
kained&able said:So then all those players are clearly ineligible to play in ther premiership and all those teams should be relegated. So says shefield united.
Aslo i think they should each be find the precedented 3.5 million( i think thats how much we got fined for b13) for breaking rukle b13 which states.
“In all matters and transactions relating to the league, each club shall behave towards each other club and the league with the utmost good faith.”
dave
kained&able said:depends ho many points iniit. I belive sheffield united want every point off every game where tevez played taken off(2 points plus our run in). You do that for all the games cech played or all the games ben haim played and im guessing thats two down.
dave

Hold on there, Brains. These are just allegations, unlike the Tevez affair which was proved to be a blatant breach of the rules, and more besides.kained&able said:mean west ham can't be deucted points now as well. I obviously was being a prick with my last post but if we got deducted points for tevez then chelsea and bolton would have to have the same done. surely?
dave

Dr. Furface said:The fact that Wham weren't docked any points for flagrantly flouting the rules means there's sod all chance of any of the clubs mentioned by Stevens getting docked any either.
Cheers hammerheadtommers said:good logic einstein.
kained&able said:and boro i think even a twn point deduction would have them down.