ginger_syn
Her Insanity laughs under pressure...👾
The first one and the last oneWas that meant to be a sentient wmd taking on the image of bad wolf rose or bad wolf rose was the sentience of the wmd? or really doesn't it matter?

The first one and the last oneWas that meant to be a sentient wmd taking on the image of bad wolf rose or bad wolf rose was the sentience of the wmd? or really doesn't it matter?

By not developing whether there was a connection between the Omega Bomb and Rose consuming Tardis energy.in what way
In the '90s they released a special edition of The Five Doctors, with "updated" special effects. I have it around here.....somewhere.watched first half of 'The Five Doctors' the other day.
whats startlingt in contrast to new who isn't the shonky effects, but the pacing. Whole seconds can pass without dialouge or music
Caught up with it last night, and it was mostly very enjoyable.
It did take me a while to really get into it tho. Mainly because - the Galifreyan high council always look rather shit; Queen Bess was a bit rubbish; but mainly, it just didnt follow from the end of the last series. There they jumped into the Docs own timeline and met War Doc. But at the begnining of this....none of that had seemingly happened.
But still, so many great bits, loadsa class lines, almost too many really, and great chemistry between the three docs
Thanks for all the recommendations. I've ordered:
Genesis of the Daleks
Tom Baker
The Dalek Invasion Of Earth
William Hartnell
The Dæmons
Jon Pertwee
The Invasion
Patrick Troughton
Looking forward to it. Now I just have to intercept the post before Mrs La Rouge, or I'll end up being given them for Christmas! She has previous...
watched first half of 'The Five Doctors' the other day.
whats startlingt in contrast to new who isn't the shonky effects, but the pacing. Whole seconds can pass without dialouge or music
I’ve now watched Dalek Invasion of Earth.
With all the goodwill in the world, it doesn’t stand the test of time. For a start, the pacing is stilted, uneven and downright creaky. I’m not talking slow; I’m talking inept. I don’t want constant action (I’m a fan of the films of Claude Chabrol, for Christ’s sake), but I do require flow, coherence, even plot development, and compelling story-telling. The light and shade has to be constructed, not haphazard, and the momentum has to come from more than hastily constructed cliffhangers.
The dialogue didn’t sound natural or convincing, and often seemed unfinished. Scenes fizzled out, and the story took all 6 episodes to get going, only to abruptly end.
The only scene worth watching was the Doctor’s famous farewell to Susan, and even the lead into that was badly handled. Furthermore, she was left behind without being asked her thoughts on the matter, with no change of clothes and only one shoe!
There were flashes of charisma from Hartnell as the Doctor, not from any dialogue, but sheer force of personality, however for great swathes of screen time he was absent.
I wasn’t expecting anything from the special effects. But some of the switches to models were unintentionally hilarious. And the sight of Ian “struggling” to lift 3 sticks we’re supposed to believe are heavy and will stop a Dalek bomb from hollowing out the core of the earth was ludicrous.
Having loved the first episode of An Unearthly Child (although I thought the rest of the serial was deeply unconvincing and half-arsed), I was hoping for more construction of that calibre. Alas, it failed to materialise.
This is not about it being antiquated; I’m a fan of antiquated. It’s about competence.
This was far worse than even the worst of Moffat’s later Smith episodes. It’s in a whole different category.
I should say, I did watch them one at a time. Admittedly not a week apart.Most of Hartnell's stories suffer from pacing problems and being far too long. To be fair to them, they were never intended to be watched in one go from start to finish so most of the early Doctor Who stories suffer from a lot of padding and irrelevant subplots. Taken as a whole, the plot structure is a bit all over the place, but taken as individual 20 minute episodes the pacing and structure is a little tighter, if that makes sense.
I’ve now watched Dalek Invasion of Earth.
With all the goodwill in the world, it doesn’t stand the test of time. For a start, the pacing is stilted, uneven and downright creaky. I’m not talking slow; I’m talking inept. I don’t want constant action (I’m a fan of the films of Claude Chabrol, for Christ’s sake), but I do require flow, coherence, even plot development, and compelling story-telling. The light and shade has to be constructed, not haphazard, and the momentum has to come from more than hastily constructed cliffhangers.
The dialogue didn’t sound natural or convincing, and often seemed unfinished. Scenes fizzled out, and the story took all 6 episodes to get going, only to abruptly end.
The only scene worth watching was the Doctor’s famous farewell to Susan, and even the lead into that was badly handled. Furthermore, she was left behind without being asked her thoughts on the matter, with no change of clothes and only one shoe!
There were flashes of charisma from Hartnell as the Doctor, not from any dialogue, but sheer force of personality, however for great swathes of screen time he was absent.
I wasn’t expecting anything from the special effects. But some of the switches to models were unintentionally hilarious. And the sight of Ian “struggling” to lift 3 sticks we’re supposed to believe are heavy and will stop a Dalek bomb from hollowing out the core of the earth was ludicrous.
Having loved the first episode of An Unearthly Child (although I thought the rest of the serial was deeply unconvincing and half-arsed), I was hoping for more construction of that calibre. Alas, it failed to materialise.
This is not about it being antiquated; I’m a fan of antiquated. It’s about competence.
This was far worse than even the worst of Moffat’s later Smith episodes. It’s in a whole different category.
Isn't it Genesis where you gat that fabulous scene when the Daleks invade the Thal city? They only had three Dalek props on set, meaning that as soon as three Daleks sweep past, there's a pause while they nip round the back of the set and come round again.I like Genesis of the Daleks a lot. It does not escape all of the above problems at all, but it has its moments and is not lacking in politics or some interesting dialogue.
I quite like the ambiguity of that, 'though I can see how it could be unsatisfying for some.By not developing whether there was a connection between the Omega Bomb and Rose consuming Tardis energy.
No, just the first serial (shown on TV the other night), and Dalek Invasion, which I bought on DVD.danny la rouge did you watch any other Hartnell? original Daleks, Keys of Marinus, Aztecs etc?
No, just the first serial (shown on TV the other night), and Dalek Invasion, which I bought on DVD.
Next DVD I'll watch is Troughton the Invasion. I'll report back. I'm looking forward to it, as Troughton was my first Doctor.
Who would win in a liberalthon between the Doctor and Picard?'Is Doctor Who a lefty?'
http://www.newstatesman.com/2013/11/spin-doctor
no, no he isn't. He's the universes biggest liberal. Thats why he's a-ok with genocide but flinches when there is a threat to someone close to him.
Was that meant to be a sentient wmd taking on the image of bad wolf rose or bad wolf rose was the sentience of the wmd? or really doesn't it matter?
Who would win in a liberalthon between the Doctor and Picard?
Picard I think. Because he's part of a massive passive aggressive space fleet whereas the Doc is a one-man band. Like monbiot compared to scandinavia