Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
where did you actually make that point?SuburbanCasual said:
And WHERE - precisely - did I say that it did?
Do people know the difference?
- Thread starter tbaldwin
- Start date
And WHERE - precisely - did I say that it did?
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
tbaldwin said:
Here is a list of your thread themes:
- Immigration
- Immigration
- Immigration
- Immigration
- Higher education is for the privileged
- Anyone with a differing point of view to my own [brand of 'socialism'] is a member of the "Liberal Left".
Baldwin logic =
Comrade X thinks football is a waste of the working class's time and money and supresses their consciousness and promotes division.
Comrade X does not actually say that he wants football banned, but the implication is always there.
However, Comrade X is adamant that he is not "anti football fan", some of his best friends are football fans, but he would like to patiently explain to them why football is a divisive evil, against their own best interests, and should be replaced by mass solitaire.
So he thinks that you can be 'anti-football' without being 'anti-football fan'.
Yeah, right, and Ian Paisley's converted to Rome.
Comrade X thinks football is a waste of the working class's time and money and supresses their consciousness and promotes division.
Comrade X does not actually say that he wants football banned, but the implication is always there.
However, Comrade X is adamant that he is not "anti football fan", some of his best friends are football fans, but he would like to patiently explain to them why football is a divisive evil, against their own best interests, and should be replaced by mass solitaire.
So he thinks that you can be 'anti-football' without being 'anti-football fan'.
Yeah, right, and Ian Paisley's converted to Rome.
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
greenman said:Here's another one -
Tebbit in the Lords this week said he wasn't against homosexuals...it was just Sodomy he opposed......
I heard a similar argument from some Xtian nutter who was protesting outside the Houses of Parliament this week. He said, "We aren't against homosexuals per se, just their lifestyle".
BTW, great stuff by dennisr that I think puts the whole debate in proper context at the beginning of this thread.
greenman said:Baldwin logic =
Comrade X thinks football is a waste of the working class's time and money and supresses their consciousness and promotes division.
Comrade X does not actually say that he wants football banned, but the implication is always there.
However, Comrade X is adamant that he is not "anti football fan", some of his best friends are football fans, but he would like to patiently explain to them why football is a divisive evil, against their own best interests, and should be replaced by mass solitaire.
So he thinks that you can be 'anti-football' without being 'anti-football fan'.
Yeah, right, and Ian Paisley's converted to Rome.
What a brilliant analogy........
Personally i think Racism is Poison but do i think that everybody who may say or think something Racist is poison...Of course not.
And i think Cancer is horrible but i dont think that everyone with cancer is horrible...
nino_savatte said:
Well Higher Education is a privellege as i now hope you accept...After my lovely thread pointing out that just 1% of the worlds population had a higher education...Just after you called me a moron for saying that it was a privellege! You seemed to go missing for a couple of months after that...
Must say i think weve all missed your towering intellect....So welcome back..
You probably missed the threads i started on Darfur.And John Pilger.And Life of Brian...But yes your right i have started one thread recently for people of limited intellects pointing out their is a difference between being anti immigration and anti immigrant....Some of them still seem really really slow to grasp it...
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
no it's not you muppet; it is a RIGHT, and the fact that so few receive that right does not make it any less so. and the fact that you cannot see it as a right makes your claim to be a socialist more spurious thzan ever. you're meant to be wholeheartedly with that other 99% remember?tbaldwin said:
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
tbaldwin said:
Still using your mythical "1%" figure, I see.
Ever thought of doing reality rather than fantasy, balders?
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
were you born thick as shit, or was it drummed into you? the fact it is enjoyed by so few does NOT make it any less of a right you clueless moron, it just shows how much our rights are traduced, which is hardly fucking surprising. ANY genuine socialist regards this a right whose attainment we need to work towards, as with so many other rights.tbaldwin said:
ever thought of having the lobotomy reversed?
and I want your source for that 1% please.
Red Jezza said:were you born thick as shit, or was it drummed into you? the fact it is enjoyed by so few does NOT make it any less of a right you clueless moron, it just shows how much our rights are traduced, which is hardly fucking surprising. ANY genuine socialist regards this a right whose attainment we need to work towards, as with so many other rights.
ever thought of having the lobotomy reversed?
and I want your source for that 1% please.
Aaaaah Yes Darling......"Let them Eat Cake"
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
stop wittering you blithering idiottbaldwin said:
and that source please
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
no I don't want to idiotboy which - AS IS COMPLETELY FUCKING OBVIOUS - is why I asked for the source.tbaldwin said:
SOURCE PLEASE!
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
tbaldwin said:
Nope, I think that (as I said at the time) if you spread the number of people who've had or are having higher ed over the world's population then it probably is less than one percent, but while you happily repeat the figure, you never repeat the qualification I made about that figure, do you?
You never point out that a large minority of the world's population may not know what a university is, what a formal school education per se is, or the implications of that.
That's your problem, you grasp at anything that supports your existing prejudices or ideas without bothering to think through the detail.
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
trans; you were lying through your teeth. and my original point stands. frights are rights before they are attained, that is the whole POINT of strugggle.tbaldwin said:
as you'd know, were you a 'socialist'.
ViolentPanda said:
Cor what a well argued point VP.....
Youve really picked out a great debating point there!!!!
So i state that 1% of the worlds population has a higher education......And you educated man that you are insist that i shouldnt do so without qualifying that i mean the whole world.......
Fantastic what a mind!
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
tbaldwin said:
Don't misrepresent me, fuckwad.
If you were anywhere near as clever as you think you are, you'd know that doing so just shows you up as a cunt. Again.
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
no fuckwit, it don't work like that.tbaldwin said:
YOU fronted a dodgy stat.
I asked you to back it up.
you didn't, and can't. THAT - plus your longstandiong and universally recognised penchant for axting a prize arse and talking shite - means you're lying.
gonna put up that source then?
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
he's argued here a fuck sigght better than you have!tbaldwin said:
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
tbaldwin said:
If that's so then pick it apart on the substantive issues, rather than just puking out fatuous comments.
C'mon then.
Similar threads
- Poll
