Do Labour voters have any blood on their hands?

[winjer]

People have the right to vote BNP too. Just because I don't like it doesn't mean they shouldn't be able to.

I never suggested anything of the sort, the question is:

Do you think BNP voters are responsible for the what the BNP does?
If not, why not?

 

[Dilzybhoy]

SNP. SSP were unavailable.

Even so I actually think anyone who voted Tory better give their hands a good scrub 'cos they where cheerleading bush and blair. Had they been in power they'd have went to war quicker and messier.
The only people totally blameless are those who voted Lib Dem or SNP or PC.
Having said that. The only fuckers with blood on their hands are those bastards in power.

In short...No.

 

[Poi E]

I don't know if Labour voters have blood on their hands, but they have voted for a party that is now in the process of aligning itself politically with such liberal luminaries as China, Egypt and Pakistan in promoting this anti-incitement to terrorism resolution at the UN. Naturally, repressive states love this as they can use the broad nature of incitement to attack whoever they wish. The UK is now little different to the US in terms of its support for repression (unless it's Mugabe,) I'm pretty disgusted at this, but perhaps shouldn't be surprised as I allowed myself the vanity of those who felt that the UK is somehow different to the US in its attitude to basic liberties.

 

[Bear]

I do not see any issue of “collective responsibility” all I am saying is that those Labour voters who re-elected Tony Blair have some blood on their hands.

I'd say that those who knowingly voted for a pro-war candidate have condoned the war.