A quick look at the site leaves me feeling concerned about the prospects for funding, Shevek.
The MA in visual anthropology seems to be a standalone, non-research masters.
There's no mention of funding of any hue or colour on their front page.
The MPhils they mention seem to be more of a lead-in to their PhD program - but again, I can't find any links to potential sources of funding for graduates listed. Unless their funded pages are elsewhere. That'd surprise me, though. It's often funding streams that attract potential applicants. When I was looking at Manc for a law PhD, they were advertising their funded places left, right and centre.
If a PhD is your long-term intention, then make sure this is the right next step for you...
e2a:
Manchester School of Social Science funding page said:
Funding
The School's attracts major external research funding (almost £5m in 2005/06).
Several new Research Centres have been established in 2005/06. Real Life Methods, a node of the ESRC National Centre for Research Methods complements several other continuing major ESRC investments. These include the Census Microdata Unit and Economic and Social Data Services (ESDS), the Centre for Research in Innovation and Competition (CRIC), the Centre for Research in Socio-Cultural Change (CRESC), the National Centre for e-Social Science (NCeSS), and the Research Methods Programme.
Hmm.
And from
the ESRC list of approved institutions and degrees;
Manchester's ESRC approved Anthropology degrees said:
MAN11001 MA (Econ) in Anthropological Research FT1+3/PT1+3
Which seems to be
this course. Which lists two ESRC quota awards:
MA in Anthropological Research said:
Scholarships/sponsorships: This programme is recognised by the ESRC for receipt of 1+3 awards. Two quota awards were available for entry in 2005.
Firstly, that isn't the MA you were thinking of applying for, Shevek. Secondly, they're either shockingly slack in updating their website, or else they've received no Quota awards since 2005. Which would suggest either an unutterably dire record in terms of completion, a poor Institutional record (in comparison to other funding bodies), changes in funding criteria, or an overall reduction of studentships. Regardless - unless they manage to win a couple of studentships for 2010 (and if they had, it would be bordering on criminally idiotic / negligent of them not to advertise it) then any applicants put forward for funding would have to go through the Open competition.