chieftain
Mega Gammon
William of Walworth said:They are called 'Tottenham'!!
No they're called Tottenham Hotspur
get over it Lad
William of Walworth said:They are called 'Tottenham'!!
souljacker said:Personally, I call them the 'yids', but thats a whole different argument!
Rollem said:face it wiliam
spurs is a nickname to be used by fans of the said tottenham hotspur
but
its also an abbreviation that saves us other fans having to waste energy on calling them by their full name
) but I believe she simply calls them 'rangers' most of the time, though not to be confused with the other rangers who are actaully the fucking 'teddy bears' of all nicknames, but at the end of the day all I want to know William is Does your theory also count for Wolves then?

William of Walworth said:I've made this point before many a time but I've never been able to get much of an answer.
Interest declared : I don't like Tottenham much, but I'd quite like a sensible discussion all the same ...
Yes, I know why Tottenham FC are called 'Spurs'. That's cool -- if it's their own fans doing so.
What mystifies me is why so many fans of other teams, and so many football commentators/journalists generally, go along with this affectionate fan-name so much.
Far more references to 'Spurs' on TV/radio/the press than you ever see to the 'Hammers', the 'Gunners', the 'Blues' etc. (yes of course these happen too, and it's a tad annoying, but try proving to me that it happens with those other teams nearly as much).
Names like that, and PARTICULARLY 'Spurs' , should be confined to FANS
When I hear some 'neutral' MOTD commentator or summariser call them 'Spurs', or see articles in the weekend sports supplements doing similar and it happens a lot) I just think (and even if I'm wrong it SOUNDS like it) :
Closet Tottenham fan journalists
(Quite apart from said journalist-fans always seeming to be bigging their 'Spurs' up as if they're as important a team as the really big ones!! But that's a bit of a different debate).
Even given the semi-justification of 'Spurs' being a shorter word than 'Tottenham' for headlines, I think this expression of public FANDOM should cease now**, especially among people who aren't Tottenham fans really, but just go along with the 'Spurs' thing because it's become such widespread practie.
<side-rant>**As should any reference, anywhere, ever, to 'Soccer'from anyone else except Americans/public school boy 'rugger'-preferrers/people from countries where rugby is dominant ie NOT MOST OF THE UK!!! Ever heard any real footy fan at any real match (in England at least -- not sure about Wales or Scotland), call it 'Soccer'???</side-rant>
Leave fan-names for the fans!!
They are called 'Tottenham'!!
Call em that and nothing else (unless you're a deluded White Hart Lane denizen, anyway)
</pet bugbear of mine>
</rant over>

Brixton Hatter said:but at the end of the day all I want to know William is Does your theory also count for Wolves then?




i dont call them wbaJTG said:Why are West Brom ...universlly known as WBA

Rollem said:i dont call them wba
i call them west brom
who calls them wba?
![]()



William of Walworth said:I've made this point before many a time but I've never been able to get much of an answer.
Interest declared : I don't like Tottenham much, but I'd quite like a sensible discussion all the same ...
Yes, I know why Tottenham FC are called 'Spurs'. That's cool -- if it's their own fans doing so.
What mystifies me is why so many fans of other teams, and so many football commentators/journalists generally, go along with this affectionate fan-name so much.
Far more references to 'Spurs' on TV/radio/the press than you ever see to the 'Hammers', the 'Gunners', the 'Blues' etc. (yes of course these happen too, and it's a tad annoying, but try proving to me that it happens with those other teams nearly as much).
Names like that, and PARTICULARLY 'Spurs', should be confined to FANS
When I hear some 'neutral' MOTD commentator or summariser call them 'Spurs', or see articles in the weekend sports supplements doing similar and it happens a lot) I just think (and even if I'm wrong it SOUNDS like it) :
Closet Tottenham fan journalists
(Quite apart from said journalist-fans always seeming to be bigging their 'Spurs' up as if they're as important a team as the really big ones!! But that's a bit of a different debate).
Even given the semi-justification of 'Spurs' being a shorter word than 'Tottenham' for headlines, I think this expression of public FANDOM should cease now**, especially among people who aren't Tottenham fans really, but just go along with the 'Spurs' thing because it's become such widespread practie.
<side-rant>**As should any reference, anywhere, ever, to 'Soccer'from anyone else except Americans/public school boy 'rugger'-preferrers/people from countries where rugby is dominant ie NOT MOST OF THE UK!!! Ever heard any real footy fan at any real match (in England at least -- not sure about Wales or Scotland), call it 'Soccer'???</side-rant>
Leave fan-names for the fans!!
They are called 'Tottenham'!!
Call em that and nothing else (unless you're a deluded White Hart Lane denizen, anyway)
</pet bugbear of mine>
</rant over>
JTG said:Damn good point.
I'll tell you what brasses me off. Cambridge and Oxford fans spelling their nicknames 'U's' which makes no grammatical sense. It's plural and should be simply 'Us'
QUOTE]
Not true - the apsotophe is used to indicate an abbrevaition of the word as in don't and you're - not to indicate possession of.
Everyone has always called them 'West Brom'. Apart from West Brom fans who call themselves Albion or Baggies. No one has ever called them WBA as far as I know.JTG said:They were always called WBA when I was a nipper
When they had Cyrille and gert big no smoking signs on their shirts
Maybe it was just my school then![]()
Fuck right off, you can't have that one!JTG said:Anyway, there's only one team in Bristol

Corax said:Do other clubs' fans have an inexplicable and unhealthy obsession with Spurs or what?
Rollem said:i dont call them wba
i call them west brom
who calls them wba?
![]()
Care to explain why?I hate all those teams as well... but spurs and newcastle the most
monkeyhead said:get a life mate, from a 'Pompey' fan


its just an irrational hatred... no reason for itstavros said:Care to explain why?

William of Walworth said:I'm not opposing (at all) you calling Portsmouth Pompey or actual Tottenham fans calling them Spurs though. As I tried to make clear, sorry if it wasn't ... my problem(ette) was with non fans doing this ...
I'm well outnumbered in this thread ... and my life has been busy hence my being elsewhere ....
Will get back when I have more time and am less stoned ...![]()
(I was straight when I started the thread though! Just a tad ranty .. sorry)
tangerinedream said:Is 'The Nottingham Hotspurts' ok though when I refer to Tottingham?


bigbry said:Not true - the apsotophe is used to indicate an abbrevaition of the word as in don't and you're - not to indicate possession of.