3 quick points:
1.The naivety and homogeneous treatment of the trade union movement on this thread is fucking embarrassing
2. Are the leaders, full timers, lay bureaucrats and other hangers on, in the main, abysmal. Abysmal in the industrial, political, organisational and representational sense? Yes.
3. 2 has always been the case in my opinion. But, power and influence in the workplace isn’t going to flow from ringing the ‘union up’ or sending them an email - it flows from shop floor organisation. High membership density. High levels of member engagement arising from the union tackling the issues are immediately present and dealing with them. Active participation by other workers by consciously involving them. Campaigns and pressure being applied from the bottom up.
To take one example. We decided when we’d return to work after the lockdown. We did risk assessments jointly with management and involved members in each part of each workplace. We set out the demands in terms of adjustments and kit required and we negotiated it in with management including protecting workers in the vulnerable category, those caring for the vulnerable and those with kids who need to be at home.
My branch has members in the public, private and voluntary sector. We’ve been able to address Covid 19 issues in each instance through organisation, planning, leverage and reputation
The full timer was not invited to be involved and had he tried to take over would have been actively resisted.
There are limits. Nationally negotiated pay, for example, in local government. Or in the bigger firms where decision making takes place above workplace level. But these are political questions and should be dealt with as such. But these aren’t the issues being raised here.
In my experience 90% of the issues raised by workers can be addressed via workplace organisation. A task well achievable for any group of workers with the ambition to do so.