ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Interesting to note that mr grean has relied so heavily on the far from authoritative wikipedia.
I'm glad you never marked any of my uni course work!!!ViolentPanda said:Interesting to note that mr grean has relied so heavily on the far from authoritative wikipedia.
He can't - he is on a wind-up/troll. He has also started another thread about how all these asians/black/muslims are getting free 'mansions' while all the poor down trodden "whites" are being oppressed. Don't take this racist muppet too seriously.Aldebaran said:...I find it already amazing that someone like the OP can *make* a difference...
That's a serious handicap, having to move like a chess bishop.
ViolentPanda said:Interesting to note that mr grean has relied so heavily on the far from authoritative wikipedia.

John Grean said:Wikipedia is probably a bit more authoritative than you though, I suspect!![]()
John Grean said:Wikipedia is probably a bit more authoritative than you though, I suspect!![]()
nino_savatte said:I doubt it.
ViolentPanda said:Whether it is or not isn't germane.
What is germane is that relying on a user-editable resource to provide support and substantiation to your arguments is not the best way to get your arguments taken seriously.
Me, I'll continue to rely on "closed" sources of data for the time being, thanks all the same.
John Grean said:Well, clearly you must be a fucking idiot because if you have ever studied history you would begin to understand that ALL sources of data are suspect!
You may find it as reliable as you like, I don't, and I don't know any academic who finds it reliable enough to recommend wikipedia's use as a source.Given that the Wikipedia project has many checks and balances fitted into the system, I would find it as reliable as any other encyclopedia, if not moreso.
Well fuck my old brown boots, if Ceefax says it's kosher it must be mustn't it?In fact, couple of months ago there was a report on Ceefax that a study has shown that Wikipedia is "at least as reliable as other encyclopedias". One major advantage being that other encyclopedias go out of date.
I didn't and don't need to, as you'd know if you had the intellect of a sparrow rather than a sparrow-turd.I note that you didn't quote any of your wonderful closed sources of info.
Says the guy who can't distinguish between an urban semi and a mansion.You fucking idiot.
BootyLove said:bin/ban
ViolentPanda said:Why, because Grean is a dolt with what appear to be dodgy politics and a poor line in argument?
Nah.
Give 'em enough rope and all that.
Ninjaboy said:am a bit worried with the little bnp style bits john grean is slyly putting into his argument
the whole premise is fucking ridiculous for a start, but in a lot of his arguments he has put little subtle bits of clear racism like "if they don't like it they can go back to....."
BootyLove said:Yeah true - it's not as hot today and the barely concealed racist is not bothering me quite so much.
ViolentPanda said:C'mon ninj, "slyly" and "subtle" aren't words you can use with reference to grean's blatant arseholery.
He's about as subtle as a prawn phal and as sly as any rightwing twat, i.e. he thinks he is but everyone else sees through him like he was a pane of glass.
Bugger knows, not something I'min favour of anyway, except in a couple of very isolated incidences. I prefer peope to be able to get up and make a prick of themselves.Ninjaboy said:whatever happened to no platform?
I think the thing with Grean is that he's making out he's anti-fascist, an ex-member of ANL, and a bit of a leftie. It's worth "debating" with him purely to watch him tie himself in knots.some of the right wingers on here bring decent arguments with them, and you get interesting debates, but this sort of 'if arabs hate the west why don't they fuck off etc' shite isn't worth a debate
ViolentPanda said:I don't know any academic who finds it reliable enough to recommend wikipedia's use as a source.
Stop the printing presses, OUP and CUP, no-one needs your texts and tomes anymore. We've got wikipedia now!
Aldebaran said:I would hope no academic you know would even mention it as a "possible source".
and add to this: stop education altogether, people have "the internet" now as The Most Reliable Source of All Information and Knowledge.
salaam.
John Grean said:Well, please feel free to elaborate on this oh wise one.
Ninjaboy said:whatever happened to no platform?
some of the right wingers on here bring decent arguments with them, and you get interesting debates, but this sort of 'if arabs hate the west why don't they fuck off etc' shite isn't worth a debate
oaktree said:It would appear that there a substantial minority of Muslims who certainly hate Britain (part of the traditional West), but of course your comment was posted before recent events.
If it is the case that Muslims hate this country, why do they continue to live here?
oaktree said:It would appear that there a substantial minority of Muslims who certainly hate Britain (part of the traditional West), but of course your comment was posted before recent events.
If it is the case that Muslims hate this country, why do they continue to live here?
Let's face it, the only targets Muslim fundamentalists attack are civilians!
FridgeMagnet said:John Grean banned yet again.