Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Do all Arabs hate the "West"?

Aldebaran said:
...I find it already amazing that someone like the OP can *make* a difference...
He can't - he is on a wind-up/troll. He has also started another thread about how all these asians/black/muslims are getting free 'mansions' while all the poor down trodden "whites" are being oppressed. Don't take this racist muppet too seriously.
 
John Grean said:
Wikipedia is probably a bit more authoritative than you though, I suspect!:p

Whether it is or not isn't germane.

What is germane is that relying on a user-editable resource to provide support and substantiation to your arguments is not the best way to get your arguments taken seriously.

Me, I'll continue to rely on "closed" sources of data for the time being, thanks all the same.
 
ViolentPanda said:
Whether it is or not isn't germane.

What is germane is that relying on a user-editable resource to provide support and substantiation to your arguments is not the best way to get your arguments taken seriously.

Me, I'll continue to rely on "closed" sources of data for the time being, thanks all the same.


Well, clearly you must be a fucking idiot because if you have ever studied history you would begin to understand that ALL sources of data are suspect!

Given that the Wikipedia project has many checks and balances fitted into the system, I would find it as reliable as any other encyclopedia, if not moreso.

In fact, couple of months ago there was a report on Ceefax that a study has shown that Wikipedia is "at least as reliable as other encyclopedias". One major advantage being that other encyclopedias go out of date.

I note that you didn't quote any of your wonderful closed sources of info.

You fucking idiot.
 
Woah there Grean!!!!

Hate, well I doubt it, be sceptical and wary of?
Too right, you'd be mad not to
Bit weird you use of the word Arab
I mean do all "English speakers" think and behave the same?
I am thinking you are either a very shallow or young and spotty person with no girlfriend
You seem full of anger all the time
Stop now
Your willy will fall otherwise
 
John Grean said:
Well, clearly you must be a fucking idiot because if you have ever studied history you would begin to understand that ALL sources of data are suspect!
:D
I already understand that, because I have (among other subjects) studied history. I also understand about context, something you appear to (unsurprisingly) have no grasp of.
Given that the Wikipedia project has many checks and balances fitted into the system, I would find it as reliable as any other encyclopedia, if not moreso.
You may find it as reliable as you like, I don't, and I don't know any academic who finds it reliable enough to recommend wikipedia's use as a source.

The info in your encyclopedia only changes between editions, the content of wikipedia can change hour from hour, and depends on people noticing changes, and rectifying them if the change is egregious.
In fact, couple of months ago there was a report on Ceefax that a study has shown that Wikipedia is "at least as reliable as other encyclopedias". One major advantage being that other encyclopedias go out of date.
Well fuck my old brown boots, if Ceefax says it's kosher it must be mustn't it?
Stop the printing presses, OUP and CUP, no-one needs your texts and tomes anymore. We've got wikipedia now!

That's the whole thing with printed encyclopedias though. They go out of date and then get revised with reference to authoritative information, not with bullshit that some prejudiced schlemiel might insert, as can happen on wikipedia.
I note that you didn't quote any of your wonderful closed sources of info.
I didn't and don't need to, as you'd know if you had the intellect of a sparrow rather than a sparrow-turd.
You fucking idiot.
Says the guy who can't distinguish between an urban semi and a mansion.

Plum.
 
am a bit worried with the little bnp style bits john grean is slyly putting into his argument

the whole premise is fucking ridiculous for a start, but in a lot of his arguments he has put little subtle bits of clear racism like "if they don't like it they can go back to....."
 
ViolentPanda said:
Why, because Grean is a dolt with what appear to be dodgy politics and a poor line in argument?

Nah.

Give 'em enough rope and all that.

Yeah true - it's not as hot today and the barely concealed racist is not bothering me quite so much.
 
Ninjaboy said:
am a bit worried with the little bnp style bits john grean is slyly putting into his argument

the whole premise is fucking ridiculous for a start, but in a lot of his arguments he has put little subtle bits of clear racism like "if they don't like it they can go back to....."


C'mon ninj, "slyly" and "subtle" aren't words you can use with reference to grean's blatant arseholery.

He's about as subtle as a prawn phal and as sly as any rightwing twat, i.e. he thinks he is but everyone else sees through him like he was a pane of glass.
 
BootyLove said:
Yeah true - it's not as hot today and the barely concealed racist is not bothering me quite so much.

Fair enough.

After all, much more fun to be had showing the soi-disant ANL member up for the sad individual he is.
 
ViolentPanda said:
C'mon ninj, "slyly" and "subtle" aren't words you can use with reference to grean's blatant arseholery.

He's about as subtle as a prawn phal and as sly as any rightwing twat, i.e. he thinks he is but everyone else sees through him like he was a pane of glass.

whatever happened to no platform?

some of the right wingers on here bring decent arguments with them, and you get interesting debates, but this sort of 'if arabs hate the west why don't they fuck off etc' shite isn't worth a debate
 
Ninjaboy said:
whatever happened to no platform?
Bugger knows, not something I'min favour of anyway, except in a couple of very isolated incidences. I prefer peope to be able to get up and make a prick of themselves.
some of the right wingers on here bring decent arguments with them, and you get interesting debates, but this sort of 'if arabs hate the west why don't they fuck off etc' shite isn't worth a debate
I think the thing with Grean is that he's making out he's anti-fascist, an ex-member of ANL, and a bit of a leftie. It's worth "debating" with him purely to watch him tie himself in knots.
 
ViolentPanda said:
I don't know any academic who finds it reliable enough to recommend wikipedia's use as a source.

I would hope no academic you know would even mention it as a "possible source".


Stop the printing presses, OUP and CUP, no-one needs your texts and tomes anymore. We've got wikipedia now!

and add to this: stop education altogether, people have "the internet" now as The Most Reliable Source of All Information and Knowledge.

salaam.
 
Aldebaran said:
I would hope no academic you know would even mention it as a "possible source".




and add to this: stop education altogether, people have "the internet" now as The Most Reliable Source of All Information and Knowledge.

salaam.

Hear hear.

This seeming reliance on the internet as a source of information, without any thought given to the impermanancy of the format, is something I find VERY worrying.
 
John Grean said:
Well, please feel free to elaborate on this oh wise one.

I don't need to: any website that allows its contents to be updated by every Tom, Dick and Harry is going to suffer from some ideological problems, namely bias.
 
Ninjaboy said:
whatever happened to no platform?

some of the right wingers on here bring decent arguments with them, and you get interesting debates, but this sort of 'if arabs hate the west why don't they fuck off etc' shite isn't worth a debate


It would appear that there a substantial minority of Muslims who certainly hate Britain (part of the traditional West), but of course your comment was posted before recent events.

If it is the case that Muslims hate this country, why do they continue to live here?

Let's face it, the only targets Muslim fundamentalists attack are civilians!
 
oaktree said:
It would appear that there a substantial minority of Muslims who certainly hate Britain (part of the traditional West), but of course your comment was posted before recent events.

If it is the case that Muslims hate this country, why do they continue to live here?

A lot of British muslims were born here, as were their parents. What right do you have to say they should go and live elsewhere? Or do you think that our 'freedom of religion' should not apply here?
I am not a muslim, but I am sometimes appalled by the actions of the UK government. Do you think that everyone like me, who disagree with our government's policy, should also leave? You don't seem to be differentiating between 'hating the country' and 'hating the policies of our government' - I think the latter is much more common, and not confined to any specific religion or ethnic group.
 
You are kidding aren't you, with that inane question? :rolleyes:

Go do something productive, like pluck your pubes.

Fuckwit.
 
oaktree said:
It would appear that there a substantial minority of Muslims who certainly hate Britain (part of the traditional West), but of course your comment was posted before recent events.

If it is the case that Muslims hate this country, why do they continue to live here?

Let's face it, the only targets Muslim fundamentalists attack are civilians!

it isn't just Muslims who hate this country, there are an awful of Xtians and people of other faiths who hate this country too. I mean Blair (and Thatcher before him) hasn't exactly made it a great place to live - has he?
 
I know hundreds of people from the Arab world who love the UK so much that they live here, learn the language and bring up their children here. Mind you, they'd probably all think that the questioner was a bit of a twat.
 
Back
Top Bottom