Johnny Canuck2 said:Check it out on Google Moon.
Lisa Ying said:This question never even crossed my mind before I saw a documentary some time ago, stating that back then we didn't have the technology to land on the moon. I never used to listen to the thories about the astronauts' shadows being in the wrong angle, flags flying without wind or the absence of stars behind them... But the documentary really amde me believe they actually were unable to land thre at all. It also said all the times they tried to test the landing equipement on earth it failed miserably. i wonder how many people actually DON'T believe in man being on the moon.
Lisa Ying said:Ah such lovely replies. Then again, 200 years ago everyone believed in god and other boo-boo stories. glad we are wise enough today to know what is true.
Johnny Canuck2 said:One question I always had: if it takes a giant titan rocket to lift off the surface of the earth, how could that puny little lunar excursion model carry enough gas to lift off the surface of the moon, straight up?

That's odd, 'cos 200 years ago people were being imprisoned for not believing in G-d. Not just in the UK, but in some US states and in European countries too.Lisa Ying said:Ah such lovely replies. Then again, 200 years ago everyone believed in god and other boo-boo stories. glad we are wise enough today to know what is true.
skyscraper101 said:Out of interest, surely the USA flag and the lunar landing module will still be up there won't it?
ViolentPanda said:That's odd, 'cos 200 years ago people were being imprisoned for not believing in G-d. Not just in the UK, but in some US states and in European countries too.
Lisa Ying said:Ah such lovely replies. Then again, 200 years ago everyone believed in god and other boo-boo stories. glad we are wise enough today to know what is true.
Lisa Ying said:Ah such lovely replies. Then again, 200 years ago everyone believed in god and other boo-boo stories. glad we are wise enough today to know what is true.
KeyboardJockey said:It would be impossible to cover up a fake moon landing so why do the conspiraloons insist on pushing this bollocks.

Aldebaran said:Unless of course they were all eliminated by the Mossad.
salaam.
KeyboardJockey said:Fucking Hell do you have to blame the Israeli's for everything![]()
![]()
![]()
Shome mishtake shurely? Wouldn't it be the CIA?
Prior to the constitution states including the one your employer is based in and Massachusetts did so, just as they'd earlier incarcerated Quakers and "witches", among others.phildwyer said:To which US states do you refer in this extraordinary assertion?
ViolentPanda said:Prior to the constitution states including the one your employer is based in and Massachusetts did so, just as they'd earlier incarcerated Quakers and "witches", among others.
Aldebaran said:No no no.
It was Israel that helped the CIA, in fact inspired it and as you know runs not only the USA but, even more important: Hollywood.
More than the USA itself Israel therefore couldn't afford to have the Russians invading the Moon first.
salaam.
Looks like there were some women accused in 1772 but i have no way to verify the statements and it's outside the timescale given by over three decades.phil said:Bullshit. Pennsylvania never incarcerated Quakers, in fact it was founded by Quakers. And the constitution was adopted longer ago than 200 years. You merely parade your ignorance here.
http://www.mayflowerfamilies.com/enquirer/quakers.htmIn the Massachusets (namely, Boston-Colony) after they have Whipp'd them, and Cut their Ears, they have now, at last, gone the furthest step they can, They Banish them upon pain of Death. We expect that we must do the like; we must Dance after their Pipe: Now Plimouth-Saddle is on the Bay-Horse.

Whatever, phil.phildwyer said:Bullshit. Pennsylvania never incarcerated Quakers, in fact it was founded by Quakers. And the constitution was adopted longer ago than 200 years. You merely parade your ignorance here.

ViolentPanda said:Whatever, phil.
You, as always, are right, and anyone else is wrong, even scholars such as Koehnline, who researched the subject. Well done, phil.
The constitution, by the way, was adopted longer ago than 200 years, how much longer though? A mere few decades.

What does the foundation of the state have to do with the reality that it was not, for very long, a majority quaker state? Did Penn and his successors institute an anti-persecution rule that enshrined Quakerism and quakers as untouchables?phildwyer said:Oh that's alright then, you were only wrong by a "mere few decades," what's that among historians eh? And if you have evidence that Pennsylvania ever imprisoned Quakers, you had better post it up or be exposed and branded as a fool. For it is the opinion of everyone else that PA was founded by William Penn, a well-known *Quaker,* precisely as a refuge for his fellow *Quakers.* Indeed it is known to this day as the "Quaker state."
Expect away.I expect either your proof to the contrary or your heartfelt apology immediately.


ViolentPanda said:What does the foundation of the state have to do with the reality that it was not, for very long, a majority quaker state? Did Penn and his successors institute an anti-persecution rule that enshrined Quakerism and quakers as untouchables?