Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

dick handed top job

Every time I see this thread I think, yeah, it's always like that. It's so rare a top job isn't handed to a dick.
 
Presumably if the UK wasn't involved in Iraq, Afghanistan, supporting Israel etc (which would hopefully be the case with a left wing government), then I can't imagine there would be many jihadi terrorist attacks. You don't seem to get that many in scandanavian countries.

Broadly correct - the UK's jihadis would then simply concentrate on inflicting their brand of Islam as rigidly as possible here.
 
Broadly correct - the UK's jihadis would then simply concentrate on inflicting their brand of Islam as rigidly as possible here.

absolutely right , the idea that if Britain wasn't involved in any foreign policy that affected muslim countries then there wouldn't be a threat is totally mistaken.
 
'inflicting islam rigidly' wouldn't mean suicide bombing, though, would it. It would mean religious leaders seeking more and more communalist control over 'their' people and more and more control over education, civil law, etc.
 
High compared to when? High compared to 1998, when a bomb in Omagh killed 220 (over four times the death toll of the 7/7 attacks)? High compared to 1988, when 270 people (five times 7/7) were killed by a bomb on a plane over Lockerbie?

There's simply no evidence of any unusual level of risk of a terrorist attack right now.

I think Paul has answered this.
 
'inflicting islam rigidly' wouldn't mean suicide bombing, though, would it. It would mean religious leaders seeking more and more communalist control over 'their' people and more and more control over education, civil law, etc.

why wouldn't it? what is the experience of far right muslim extremists across the globe?
 
why wouldn't it? what is the experience of far right muslim extremists across the globe?

well, in countries like France and Germany, which quite probably have far more far right islamists than the UK, there's been no suicide bombings. Like I said, the clever islamists will want to use the helping hand of the local state and its desire to outsource public services as a trojan horse to a religionisation of society.
 
well, in countries like France and Germany, which quite probably have far more far right islamists than the UK, there's been no suicide bombings. Like I said, the clever islamists will want to use the helping hand of the local state and its desire to outsource public services as a trojan horse to a religionisation of society.

What on earth makes you think that there are more far right islamists in France or Germany ?

Also where is this example of religous organisations being the beneficueries of outsourced public services? A handful of schools in Britain doesn't demonstrate desire at all. In France there is a clear sepraration of religion and the state so where would the desire emanate from?
 
In what way are Islamists far-right? Extreme authoritarians, yes-but what makes them far-right?
 
In what way are Islamists far-right? Extreme authoritarians, yes-but what makes them far-right?

It's a handy way to group them, and point out their similarities with christian conservatives. It is right, however, that most followers of political islam would not consider themselves on the left-right scale.
 
Because they both have far more Muslims. Still, no suicide bombings as of the yet. Funny that, isn't it?

Not funny but very fortunate and fingers crossed it stays that way.

It is funny that you try and equate the number of number of far right extremists with the number of muslims. The spread of far right islamic extremism is political rather than mathmatical. Also don't forget the bombings in the mid 1990s in France.
 
Not funny but very fortunate and fingers crossed it stays that way.

It is funny that you try and equate the number of number of far right extremists with the number of muslims. The spread of far right islamic extremism is political rather than mathmatical. Also don't forget the bombings in the mid 1990s in France.

Linked to the civil war in algeria rather than to an attempt to impose islam on france though.
 
That if anything undermines your idea that there are more Islamic extremists in France than Britain

It's quite simple. All the Islamist attacks in Europe have been linked to foreign wars. None can be linked to jihadis 'inflicting their brand of Islam as rigidly as possible here.'

That will mean more the everyday violence of honour killings, beatings - control of the communalist community. This is a far worse prospect than a few wingnuts who want to blow up 'crusaders' or 'slags' at the disco, as it cannot be opposed by simple police power but only by social action.
 
Broadly correct - the UK's jihadis would then simply concentrate on inflicting their brand of Islam as rigidly as possible here.

They could try anything they like. But given that muslims are only 2.8% of the UK population, and given that jihadis are in turn a tiny percentage of those 2.8% of muslims I can't really see them having much success. There's probably more chance of christian fundamentialism making a come back, in terms of the broader population, and that must be an extremely slim chance.

As has been pointed out above all the terrorist attacks are linked to foreign wars. Iraq, Afghanistan, Chechyna, Algeria etc

Sweden and Switzerland, for instance, have, by percentage, a bigger muslim population that the UK but there have been absolutely no terrorist attacks and no threats either that I know of.

A left government may well be a way off, but if there was one I don't think jihadist terrorist attacks would be much up the line of worries given that imperialist countries would be putting in all their resources to undermine it.
 
It's quite simple. All the Islamist attacks in Europe have been linked to foreign wars. None can be linked to jihadis 'inflicting their brand of Islam as rigidly as possible here.'

That will mean more the everyday violence of honour killings, beatings - control of the communalist community. This is a far worse prospect than a few wingnuts who want to blow up 'crusaders' or 'slags' at the disco, as it cannot be opposed by simple police power but only by social action.

The problem is is that Islamic extremism and terrorism whilst being 'linked' to foreign wars is not based on actual foreign wars but more of a notion of a war aginst Islam itself. To limit the discussion to attacks in Europe conveniently misses out the fact that more attacks have taken place outside Europe and against govts, institutions, and civilians who have nothing to do with foreign wars.

I would also challenge the notion that simple police power can oppose those involved in terrorism or extremism.The isolation of the wingnuts in Luton is primarily down to ordinary muslims who see them as much as threat as the non muslim community
 
To limit the discussion to attacks in Europe conveniently misses out the fact that more attacks have taken place outside Europe and against govts, institutions, and civilians who have nothing to do with foreign wars.
What are you talking about here?
 
What are you talking about here?

You have made a point that, in your view , all terrorist attacks in Europe were 'linked ' to foreign wars. I am arguing that terrorist attacks are not just limited to being 'linked' to foreign wars and that there is wider picture to be gained from looking past Europe into a world wide assessment.

Savvy?
 
Here's another humongous go fuck yourselves:

Menezes police officer gets top IPCC role

A top Scotland Yard officer who was personally criticised for failings in the Jean Charles de Menezes shooting has been appointed to the leadership of the Independent Police Complaints Commission.

Commander Moir Stewart will be the IPCC's new director of investigations and a member of its management board.
 
It's amazing how such a supposedly talented woman gave such tragically ambiguous instructions on a muffed mission eh? If this really is the best and most sensitive appointment the police can make then it's a sad indictment on standards.
 
good question. 'course, it could be that there really was no-one else good enough to do the job applied, and they needed to fill the role straight off. but that's a vanishingly small possibility...
 
Seems to be people appointed by the Home sec who took this decision, and they seem to be load of ex-CPS, police trainers, and mangerial types. Unless the home sec apponited this one too.
 
She's actually one of the best senior officers in the UK by a country mile ...

There is nothing you can actually lay at her door in terms of her account of what happened. There were some serious communication issues involving her ... but they were certainly not caused by her.

The way she has handled the stress she has had since (internal and external to the MPS) has been quite extraordinary.

:hmm::eek::mad::rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom