Will that link spoil the programme?
What was wrong with that?![]()
His appeal (to me at least) is based on his mental tricks, the way he toys with people's minds and uses subtle persuasion to influence people. It's difficult to tell where the "trick" is occuring, and it keeps you guessing. Visual tricks like the one with the table, are just cheap parlour tricks, and easily explained. It takes a lot of the joy out of it for me.
. . . but reverting to typical conjouring, well, you expect more from him I suppose.
Ah, fair enough. He does know a lot of that stuff inside out and can usually work it into his routine quite impressively, but reverting to typical conjouring, well, you expect more from him I suppose.
This is obviously staged. YOu can't mind control the outcome of a racing event without some backstage chicanery.
That worries me though. Why would Derren go through several series, stating that nothing has been staged, there are no stooges etc, only to suddenly go back on this? He didn't use the disclaimer during "trick or treat" which made me quite sceptical about the series.
Do this for mutiple people and only broadcast the one with all succesful guesses?
Just a guess. And that blog post linked upthread confirmed it.

That was because some of the people indirectly involved were actors - the ambulance crew or something. Not anyone who was actually being subjected to his trickery.
Given that he can't actually predict the results of races, it's pretty much the only way he can have done it. I think it likely that the whole point of the programme will be at first to show how he can appear to be doing it, and then show how he tricked us and the participants.I don't think DB would have the audacity to film several versions of this prgram, and only run the successful one. He's an intelligent man, wouldn't leave himself as wide open as that. There has to be something else to it.
Given that he can't actually predict the results of races, it's pretty much the only way he can have done it. I think it likely that the whole point of the programme will be at first to show how he can appear to be doing it, and then show how he tricked us and the participants.
A big reason why many magic tricks work is that the audience don't believe the performer would have gone to as much trouble as they have done.
He said he's gonna explain how its done on the show so we should sit tight and wait to see what he says
Not that I'll believe him anyway the shyster![]()
Maybe it's as simple as convincing the participant that their horse is the one they see winning when infact it's not. Sounds too simple but this is what he did at the dogs when he convinced the bookie he had the winning ticket. Looking forward to finding out.
DB = Uber Evil Genius. And if I ever see him I'm going to run away as fast as possible.
Just a guess. And that blog post linked upthread confirmed it.

there's no other way he can do this. mesmerism and sleight of hand are one thing, but 'psychically' predicting winners on the nags? no chance.That worries me though. Why would Derren go through several series, stating that nothing has been staged, there are no stooges etc, only to suddenly go back on this? He didn't use the disclaimer during "trick or treat" which made me quite sceptical about the series.
yes but that would be really silly.Maybe it's as simple as convincing the participant that their horse is the one they see winning when infact it's not. Sounds too simple but this is what he did at the dogs when he convinced the bookie he had the winning ticket. Looking forward to finding out.
DB = Uber Evil Genius. And if I ever see him I'm going to run away as fast as possible.

Yeah, the "trick" was buying all six tickets and then making sure she had the winning one in her hand when she opened it.

