Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Demo against Army 'homecoming' march in luton

Well, let's not mess about with possible misinterpretations of original posts and so on, unless you really want to - would you agree that there might be legitimate reasons, and if so, what makes you think that these people aren't expressing them?

yes of course there are legit reasons .. many! the war , the use of parades etc i suspect the reaction of the crowd to a quaker demo would be differrent

are these legit anti war though .. the jury is out .. it is unclear who they are .. they do not appear anti war but jihadi .. the slogans in english are neutral bu they are shouting islamitic sligans .. so i'm 60-40 they are jihadists for whom i have no time ..


jihadis have a base in Luton ..

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/in-luton-summit-is-treated-with-contempt-499484.html

and opponents in the muslim community

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2004/apr/26/religion.world
 
I've just seen the report on the TV news (BBC1).

The protestors were Bakri-ites - Al-Mooo, that is, though the gits trade under other names now.
 
its not the allah akbar chanting i have a problem with (although i'm uncomfortable with ANY religion being mixed with politics on demos tbf), its the fact that one of them was holding a sign (in the clip i saw) saying soldiers go to hell ... and it looked pretty godhatesfagsy to me ...
 
The Islamoshites of al-Mooo have won themselves a load of free publicity with their little stunt in Luton. Impressively, for such a small group of police-protected shouters, they are front page news on at least three national 'newspapers' tomorrow: Mail, Express & Star.
 
Just looked at it again. What a big big nothing of a story. Not a story. Nothing. half a dozen people shouting a bit and a bit of counter aggro. That's it.

The only reason to run it is the islamaphobe agenda. The establishment are totally desparate for ANYTHING to take attention away from capitalism's biggest screw-up in history. The fundieloons really aint up to much recently (perhaps MI5 and 6 have had budget restrictions) so this sort of thing will have to make do.

This has really pissed me off. I bet there are dozens of demos everyday that are bigger than this - a school closing down, some crappy development people dont like. Significance doesnt make the agenda. Deliberate politicised gerrymandering does.
 
The Islamoshites of al-Mooo have won themselves a load of free publicity with their little stunt in Luton. Impressively, for such a small group of police-protected shouters, they are front page news on at least three national 'newspapers' tomorrow: Mail, Express & Star.

3 of the most virulent race-hate rags on this septic isle, which lends fuel to my point above :mad::mad::mad:
 
that'll give the bnp a few hundred votes in luton
Freedoms a bitch isn't it. 'Jihadis' protesting against soldiers, BNP being allowed to stand in elections. On one side angry young kids being whipped into a frenzy by by people telling them there is a war against Islam while on the other people being whipped into a frenzy by people telling them there is a war against white indigenous British.

You think those two groups might have more in common than meets the eye?
 
To be honest they were acting out exactly how i feel if i see any soldiers marching around - something particularly depressing about a parade
 
Just looked at it again. What a big big nothing of a story. Not a story. Nothing. half a dozen people shouting a bit and a bit of counter aggro. That's it.

The only reason to run it is the islamaphobe agenda.
So you don't think that those people taking part in the rather audacious protest knew damn well that it would attract major publicity in the curent political climate?

That either makes the protesters staggeringly naive or rather PR-savvy and fully aware of the best way to get maximum publicity for their cause.

Which do you think it is, taffboy?
 
So you don't think that those people taking part in the rather audacious protest knew damn well that it would attract major publicity in the curent political climate?

Kerry MCarthy MP reports that the BNP certainly know that something was expected to happpen and took full advantage of it.
I've spoken briefly about this to one of the Luton MPs tonight, and someone else in Luton. What seems clear is that it was a very small group who protested against the soldiers' parade. (You can see from the photos accompanying the Mail article - it's a handful). They were of course entirely wrong to do so, and action should be taken against anyone whose behaviour could be seen as inflammatory or an incitement to hatred.

However, some of those described by the Daily Mail as "a large number of local people, some waving Union and St George's flags" were actually BNP activists, I'm told, who had come to Luton because they knew there would be trouble. Just as the decent, law-abiding Muslim community in Luton would be appalled by the behaviour of those extremists who purport to act in the name of Islam, I would like to think that the decent, law-abiding general public in Luton would be similarly appalled by the actions of the BNP in using this homecoming event to promote their own brand of hatred.
 
Similar sign/slogan in this 2007 picture from outside the danish embassy in london:
policeES1807_468x369.jpg
 
that'll give the bnp a few hundred votes in luton

On another forum i use a BNP bastard is using the story to try exactly that.

Pointless and very wrong protest by nutcases who are doing nothing but hurt anyone that even looks Muslim.
Daft bastards. :(
 
A handful of nutters, no more representative of Muslims than the Westboro Baptist mob are of Christians. Their little protest has probably ensured a bigger turnout of supporters at future homecoming parades, however.
 
that'll give the bnp a few hundred votes in luton

Radical Islam is really no different from the BNP.

Oh, except that where Radical Islamists would behead non-believers, the BNP would deport many of it's opponents.
Perhaps one is far worse than the other.
 
Freedoms a bitch isn't it. 'Jihadis' protesting against soldiers, BNP being allowed to stand in elections. On one side angry young kids being whipped into a frenzy by by people telling them there is a war against Islam while on the other people being whipped into a frenzy by people telling them there is a war against white indigenous British.

You think those two groups might have more in common than meets the eye?

Abso-fucking-lutely.
 
"legit anti-war"?

yes that is a fair statement .. if someone supports one side of the war but pretends to be against war to attack the other side, then it is illegitimate and dishonets imho

by th way though 'anti war' is what the BBC put on them .. not what they may have called themselves
 
So you don't think that those people taking part in the rather audacious protest knew damn well that it would attract major publicity in the curent political climate?

That either makes the protesters staggeringly naive or rather PR-savvy and fully aware of the best way to get maximum publicity for their cause.

Which do you think it is, taffboy?
^^^^

and these people are not 'no bodies' .. from their swamp came those who bombed London ;)
 
I think any decent person would have been glad to hear about this protest. I was overjoyed to see truth spoken on the news last night.

The military has ramped up its PR in the last year, these homecoming military parades are just about PR for the Afghan and Iraq War.

Why should people who have taken part in the occupation and invasion of other peoples countries be allowed to strut around our streets like heroes? Military parades should be faced down by anti-war protests that say we shouldn't rally around the troops, Iraq and Afghan are unjust wars of occupation and crimes, and the troops should get out.

my heart was gladdened to see those Muslims showing the way with their placards that identified the real heroes were the Iraqi and Afghan people and rightly lambasted the military as 'Butchers of Basra',it would have been great if there were also placards raising working class issues - the enemy of working class is not Iraqis or Afghans but our rulers/

My only reservation is tactical. Many soldiers I've met are deeply sceptical of the current spate of wars & you want to think how can you build an anti-war current within the armed forces and educate these soldiers about why they should turn their guns on the real enemies of the working class.
 
yes that is a fair statement .. if someone supports one side of the war but pretends to be against war to attack the other side, then it is illegitimate and dishonets imho

by th way though 'anti war' is what the BBC put on them .. not what they may have called themselves

What reactionary nonsense, the Iraqis and Afghan people have as much right to resist occupation and invasion as the French resistance, Warsaw ghetto rising or Italian partisans in the 1940s.

What I loved about this protest was the way that it cut through all the patriotic nationalist bullshit, it was just ashame that the broader anti-war movement hasn't shown such audacity.
 
Thought the demo was a bit counter productive myself.I'm stating the obvious but it would be better to go after the state who sent the troops to Afghanistan and Iraq in the first place.
This extremely tiny little incident is going to be blown out of all proportion and exploited by the tabloids to whip up even more islamophobia and bigotry.
 
Back
Top Bottom