Fedayn
Well-Known Member
what makes you think so?![]()
Army recruitment has always been higher in areas of high unemployment and has increased when unemployment increases.
what makes you think so?![]()
as what fedayn says .. sad but true .. was reading about this on cnn or msnbc in the states earlier but can't find it nowwhat makes you think so?![]()
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/7935049.stm shows people trying to attack the demo
Well, let's not mess about with possible misinterpretations of original posts and so on, unless you really want to - would you agree that there might be legitimate reasons, and if so, what makes you think that these people aren't expressing them?
The Islamoshites of al-Mooo have won themselves a load of free publicity with their little stunt in Luton. Impressively, for such a small group of police-protected shouters, they are front page news on at least three national 'newspapers' tomorrow: Mail, Express & Star.



Freedoms a bitch isn't it. 'Jihadis' protesting against soldiers, BNP being allowed to stand in elections. On one side angry young kids being whipped into a frenzy by by people telling them there is a war against Islam while on the other people being whipped into a frenzy by people telling them there is a war against white indigenous British.that'll give the bnp a few hundred votes in luton
You think those two groups might have more in common than meets the eye?
To be honest they were acting out exactly how i feel if i see any soldiers marching around - something particularly depressing about a parade

So you don't think that those people taking part in the rather audacious protest knew damn well that it would attract major publicity in the curent political climate?Just looked at it again. What a big big nothing of a story. Not a story. Nothing. half a dozen people shouting a bit and a bit of counter aggro. That's it.
The only reason to run it is the islamaphobe agenda.
So you don't think that those people taking part in the rather audacious protest knew damn well that it would attract major publicity in the curent political climate?
I've spoken briefly about this to one of the Luton MPs tonight, and someone else in Luton. What seems clear is that it was a very small group who protested against the soldiers' parade. (You can see from the photos accompanying the Mail article - it's a handful). They were of course entirely wrong to do so, and action should be taken against anyone whose behaviour could be seen as inflammatory or an incitement to hatred.
However, some of those described by the Daily Mail as "a large number of local people, some waving Union and St George's flags" were actually BNP activists, I'm told, who had come to Luton because they knew there would be trouble. Just as the decent, law-abiding Muslim community in Luton would be appalled by the behaviour of those extremists who purport to act in the name of Islam, I would like to think that the decent, law-abiding general public in Luton would be similarly appalled by the actions of the BNP in using this homecoming event to promote their own brand of hatred.
Similar sign/slogan in this 2007 picture from outside the danish embassy in london:
![]()
that'll give the bnp a few hundred votes in luton

that'll give the bnp a few hundred votes in luton
Freedoms a bitch isn't it. 'Jihadis' protesting against soldiers, BNP being allowed to stand in elections. On one side angry young kids being whipped into a frenzy by by people telling them there is a war against Islam while on the other people being whipped into a frenzy by people telling them there is a war against white indigenous British.
You think those two groups might have more in common than meets the eye?
"legit anti-war"?
^^^^So you don't think that those people taking part in the rather audacious protest knew damn well that it would attract major publicity in the curent political climate?
That either makes the protesters staggeringly naive or rather PR-savvy and fully aware of the best way to get maximum publicity for their cause.
Which do you think it is, taffboy?

it did look a bit like that ..Kerry MCarthy MP reports that the BNP certainly know that something was expected to happpen and took full advantage of it.
yes that is a fair statement .. if someone supports one side of the war but pretends to be against war to attack the other side, then it is illegitimate and dishonets imho
by th way though 'anti war' is what the BBC put on them .. not what they may have called themselves