Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

deconstructing 'paedophile gangs'

they're not smears you stupid little cunt, they are accurate reports of your pimp loving quotes. (eg, new sex workers having to pay 'a small amount of money' to their recruiter - and then admitting that that 'small amount' equals 20% for six months, and thats just for the procurer, not even mentioning the pimp! Abnd then there ws the hilarious (or at least it would be) claim that ALL the problems related to prostitution came about through trafficking laws, your laughable prtence that there was no abuse before they were brought in.


Ok .You were asked to provided evidence to back up your lies and .........you can't. not one link. Not one quoted post. I think we can all now see that...

Belboid you are a liar.
 
lol, only in your head, and i dont give a shit about the opinion of a misogynist like you.

I hope you're noty going to threaten to assault me now
 
What's he lying about here, then? Seems like the most sensible poster on this thread. :)

You'd like to estimate the numbers trafficked? Or the extent of "paedophile gangs?" You think either are the most pressing problems for kids today?

I think paedohpile gangs are a pressing problem for kids.Not all gangs make it onto the news.For every gang arrested theres hundereds more getting away with it.The internet is being watched by over 500 trained officers every day in britain alone.They monitor activity and try to stop the abuse before it starts.Very often they have to let the abuse continue so as to catch the `top dogs`.If being abused isnt a problem for kids what is ?
 
well done on killing another thread tho, misogyny boy

You have killed this thread with your persistent and vile smears and lies and abuse.

I have been very reasonable in my response to your outrageous smears.

You have accused me of being a pimp. I have asked you to provide evidence for that. You have failed to do so. You are a liar

You have accused me of supporting the abuse of women. Again I have asked you to provide evidence for that. You have failed to do so. You are a liar.

I have responded to your abuse with the very reasonable request that you provided evidence of your accusations. Of course you cannot.

I have passed on your abusive pms to the mods. Have a nice day.
 
Yes. They are all in bondage. They are all lied to. It's true. Thousands of women naively accept jobs as secretaries only to be tricked and sold into slavery by evil traffickers, Of course they are. noone would voluntarily become a prostitute would they? They are victims not consenting adults. It doesn't matter that they say they are workers. They would say that wouldn't they. What do they know? They are victims. They need rescuing and rehabilitating even if that's against their wishes.

But what of the children? a nice emotive subject with which to hide the persecution of adult sex workers and a nice emotive brush with which to tar your critics.


So lets start a moral panic.

Lets pretend that sexual abuse of children doesn't take place behind the lace curtains of middle class homes. Not nearly as salacious as images of child sex slaves groomed to order from Bebo.

No, lets feed the fear of the stranger. Lets paint an image of evil monsters trawling the internet for our kids. "Grooming" them, right under our noses, for their evil "trafficking" gangs while they chat on myspace.

So, don't trust your neighbours, or your new lover or each other. CRB everyone in your life. Don't let your children play outside or walk home from school or use myspace. Don't trust your neighbour to watch the kids for an hour while you go to Tesco's. Fear the stranger, fear each other, hand over your civil liberties to New Labour moralists like Jackie Smith. All in the name of "child protection."

We are witnessing a moral panic people, wake up. The images of hordes of sex slaves tricked and trafficked is bollocks. The image of gangs of paedos haunting the web and "grooming" your kids is bollocks. Sexual abuse is massive and it's much closer to home
.


So youre saying there are no sex slaves or trafficking and no one grooming kids on the net ?
 
You have killed this thread with your persistent and vile smears and lies and abuse.

I have been very reasonable in my response to your outrageous smears.

You have accused me of being a pimp. I have asked you to provide evidence for that. You have failed to do so. You are a liar

You have accused me of supporting the abuse of women. Again I have asked you to provide evidence for that. You have failed to do so. You are a liar.

I have responded to your abuse with the very reasonable request that you provided evidence of your accusations. Of course you cannot.

I have passed on your abusive pms to the mods. Have a nice day.
I didnt accuse you of being a pimp, I said you excused them, and you do. That is a simple fact.

her's you excusing pimps - http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=9870014&highlight=village#post9870014

20% for six months, not including pimps fee's, wow, what a bargain.

i'm sure you'll say that isn't excusing and apologising for pimping and the abuse of women, but it most definitely is in my book.

dylans said:
Again and again he emphasised to me that Glitter never committed a single offence in Cambodia. Nor was he even suspected. He was hounded out by the tabloid press and Western NGO's. Many of them from "anti-trafficking" brigade.
 
Police swoop on man accused of grooming girl
Victoria Kirby and Dean Kirby

November 18, 2009

THIS is the moment police snared a suspected paedophile accused of grooming a teenage girl over the internet.

The man, 51, is said to have been waiting for a 14-year-old girl when undercover officers swooped on him in Manchester.

He is alleged to have spent months grooming on the internet, saying he was 17 and sending her a photograph. But the girl was really an officer from Greater Manchester Police sexual crime unit, who was tracking his every move.

Reporter Victoria Kirby was given exclusive access to the unit during the swoop as part of the Websafe internet safety campaign we are running all this week with Real Radio and Channel M.

The arrested man was later bailed pending further inquiries.



You mean things like this are made up ?
 
I didnt accuse you of being a pimp, I said you excused them, and you do. That is a simple fact.

her's you excusing pimps - http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=9870014&highlight=village#post9870014

20% for six months, not including pimps fee's, wow, what a bargain.

i'm sure you'll say that isn't excusing and apologising for pimping and the abuse of women, but it most definitely is in my book.

Really? Is that the best you can do?

The example I gave may not suit the puritanical vision you wish to project of sex slaves in bondage but it remains the reality for the vast majority of cross border sex workers. I stand by it 100%

Pulling out a gary glitter quote completely out of context is low even for a cretinous dishonest liar like you.

I have sent your abusive pm to the mods. You know the one where you don't accuse me of being a pimp?
 
I am not puritanical dear boy. The quotwe illustrates to me your naivety on the subjecy - a naivety I have to believe is entirely wilful. 'Oh those happy hookers, just glad to be away from the fields, much preferring a fifty year old western belly slamming into them over and over on a daily basis.'

That attitude, along with the pretence that any abuse of sex workers is down to the 'trafficking brigade' is sheer nonsnese, and is nothing but an apologia for pimps and ther abusers. In my ever so humble opinion.

The quote re Glitter should have had an explanatory note, I agree. The quote was from someone dylands claims was Glitters landlord, and is repeated without comment or crictical thought. It comes in the context of asking whether sex tourism is exageratted and part of the 'agenda' (which dylans and the landlord think it is). Quite what favours dylans thought it did him to post it, I have no idea.
 
You mean things like this are made up ?

With respect, that isn't what the OP is about.

The mainstream media (i.e BBC) coverage of this is a very convenient way of disguising the growth of a huge international slave industry, which they don't like to report? instead, they've deployed the ultimate tabloid meme, because when people hear it they just think it's about feral groups of pervs or w/e (not that there aren't any)


The claim of the OP was that the media is somehow ignoring a "huge international Slave Industry" It is this that I dispute. Of course there are examples of indiividiual criminal activity such as the one you give. This doesn't mean there is a "huge international slave industry" operating to steal our children off facebook however
 
aah, so you are posting PM's now, naughty boy. Shame you dont understand 'rhetoric'. A shame, but hardly a suprise.

I repeat, as i will repeat every time you post up your shite, you apologise for pimping and the abuse of women. That is my sincere opinion, and all your shouting and distortions of reality won't change that.
 
aah, so you are posting PM's now, naughty boy. Shame you dont understand 'rhetoric'. A shame, but hardly a suprise.

I repeat, as i will repeat every time you post up your shite, you apologise for pimping and the abuse of women. That is my sincere opinion, and all your shouting and distortions of reality won't change that.

It is you and your fellow anti traffickers who are the real abusers of women

As a direct result of anti trafficking legislation, sex workers around the globe are being arrested, robbed, gang raped, and imprisoned against their will. This is the abuse that you apologise for. This is the abuse that you support.


It is you and those like you who refuse to see sex workers as anything but victims who are real the abusers of women. You impose your own moral agenda on to the lives of thousands and you really don't give a fuck for the consequences.

 
and you repeat your lies as to my point of view, as you did on the other thread. as you would say, link me up with my 'moral agenda', or admit you're lying.
 
I think you've made your point of view very clear, actually.

But, by all means, do try to explain why you entertain and publish your reprehensible fantasies about other folks' sex lives.
 
The thing is, belboid, you are a puritan (as well as a prurient fantasist). You think prostitution is abuse of women, by its very nature.

This prejudice blinds you to the real problems; the policies that flow from your prejudiced moralising do a great deal of harm.
 
no, i dont think that, and no one who has read my contributions to these threads would hold such an opinion.

not unless they had there own personal reasons for being so dishonest.
 
It is you and your fellow anti traffickers who are the real abusers of women

As a direct result of anti trafficking legislation, sex workers around the globe are being arrested, robbed, gang raped, and imprisoned against their will. This is the abuse that you apologise for. This is the abuse that you support.


It is you and those like you who refuse to see sex workers as anything but victims who are real the abusers of women. You impose your own moral agenda on to the lives of thousands and you really don't give a fuck for the consequences.



All we are saying is give peace a chance. Sorry dylan i mean.:rolleyes::p

All dylans is saying is give rapists and sex traffickers a chance
 
With respect, that isn't what the OP is about.

The mainstream media (i.e BBC) coverage of this is a very convenient way of disguising the growth of a huge international slave industry, which they don't like to report? instead, they've deployed the ultimate tabloid meme, because when people hear it they just think it's about feral groups of pervs or w/e (not that there aren't any)


The claim of the OP was that the media is somehow ignoring a "huge international Slave Industry" It is this that I dispute. Of course there are examples of indiividiual criminal activity such as the one you give. This doesn't mean there is a "huge international slave industry" operating to steal our children off facebook however


And yet every day kids are being groomed on the internet and persuaded to meet up with paedophiles who then `pass` the onto their `friends`.You cant say it isnt happening cos it is believe you me.Over 500 officers a week are monitoring child sex rings in britain alone and it still isnt enough officers.
 
All we are saying is give peace a chance. Sorry dylan i mean.:rolleyes::p

All dylans is saying is give rapists and sex traffickers a chance


Traffickers like these?
http://blip.tv/file/970833

Or these?
http://www.nodo50.org/Laura_Agustin/us-anti-sex-trafficking-law-causes-police-violence-in-cambodia


Perhaps you mean traffickers like these?
http://www.channels.com/episodes/show/3402316/I-Am-A-Sex-Worker

Rapists? Do you mean rapists like these?
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/06/14/18507003.php

Or perhaps you mean rapists like these?
http://swannet.org/en/node/1029

It is you, and your fellow puritans who are literally giving rapists a chance. By disempowering sex workers and driving the industry underground you are leaving them vulnerable to gross human rights abuses.

Cambodia has recently passed an anti-trafficking law which equates all sex work with trafficking and has led to massive closures of brothels and widespread human rights abuses against sex workers. Sex workers have been forcibly detained in rehabilitation centres where they have been raped and robbed by police and guards. Thousands of women have lost their livelihoods and HIV positive sex workers have great difficulty in accessing ARV’s- both in and outside the detention centres.
Condoms are being used as evidence of sex work and carrying condoms leads to arrest or forced “rehabilitation.” Sex workers are scared to carry condoms and to access STI services. The national HIV prevention programs for sex workers have completely broken down.


Who is giving rapists a chance?
 
i wouldn't even try and argue with dylans if I were you. he'll ignore every bit of evidence that doesn't tally with his view, and then accuse you of being a 'puritan' for the heinous crime of disagreeing with him. At least dwyer can't play his even dumber monkey this time tho. 'Sex trafficking' doesn't exist, and if you think it does, you obviously hate women.
 
Back
Top Bottom