Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Danielle Lloyd FC

Anyway, I reckon Pique in central defence, Traore down the left. A front pairing of Sheringham laying off the ball for Defoe to run with, Babel playing down the right. Marcus Bent is gonna have to go on the bench, I'm not playing him in midfield. Needs more in defence, definitely.
 
Of course, this does present the interesting query of what constitutes objectification and how acceptable is it anyway. I've always considered that there is a certain amount of objectification acceptable. After all, everyone wanks.
 
Of course, this does present the interesting query of what constitutes objectification and how acceptable is it anyway. I've always considered that there is a certain amount of objectification acceptable. After all, everyone wanks.

I pretty much try never to think about it in my day to day life. Honestly, you'd be crippled if you analysed every social interaction in the kind of detail that gets done on here.

I'd say it's fine to say "A is good looking, B is not" but reckon "A has fucking amazing tits" is the wrong side of downright uncouth. Similarly, "check out the state of B, d'you reckon you'd fuck it?" would be unacceptable. As would "I'd like to spaff in A's eyes" and "B has a disgustingly hairy X, I want to be sick"

I hope this has been educational for you as well as a revealing glimpse into the sound of buses in Havering.
 
You're the one who said it was. :confused:

i may have. what i meant, though, was that sometimes kennie has been guilty of objectifying women, which has earned him the label misogynist. There are posts on this thread alluding to it, but i was trying to say that sometimes there are women you want to have a pop at - which doesn't necessarily mean you are a misogynist.
 
Well, it's not meant that way. It's amusing to me that she happens to have been with six blokes who are all premiership footballers and I thought it'd be a killer wheeze to piece together the rest of a potential team.

For all I know she could've been with six men and six men only and, anyway, as someone who started a thread in which I said I wished I could knock a good 80% of all my sexual partners off my total about a week and a half ago, I'd hardly be one to talk would I? Perhaps it is you who is the misogynist, zenie? I haven't cast a single aspersion on her for going with the men, only for the racism - as I say, it's just funny they happen to all do the same job.
So she's racist, yet most of the footballers she's been with are black. :confused:
 
It's possible to like the blacks but not the browns. That's a pretty common form of racism where I come from :(
 
So she's racist, yet most of the footballers she's been with are black. :confused:

It's entirely possible to date/sleep with and enjoy Black people but to have internalised racist ideas. Even Black people have managed to internalise racist stuff about themselves.

Just as women can have internalised ideas that are misogynist.......It's about dominant culture and what messages are carried as 'norms' and right.

It's possible to like the blacks but not the browns. That's a pretty common form of racism where I come from :(

^^^ This...Could be right.
 
Park doesnt count either! he asian as in from asia rather then the former india.

which has always confused me. I blame america.

dave
 
Motherfucker!

its not my fault its all the americans fault for not being able to tell the difference between wah-wah indians and dotty indians and therfore calling dottys asians.

I reckon.

Ahh hold on that makes it all the dirty italian columbus' fault doesn't it?

dave(getting into the spirit of thanks giving)
 
its not a geographical thing though its a cultural thing. I doubt to many Bangledeshi peeps identify much with Isrealies.

Which is what this is about surely.


without wanting to be uncooth i wouldn't ever think anyone would call a georgian or saudi arabian(for example) a paki.


dave
 
Back
Top Bottom