Random
Ethnic nalgocrat
Basically sympathetic to the empire, coupled with an alibi in the shape of a nice line in busting the eminent victorians. Fraser's basic line is that while the Brits may have behaved disgustingly at times, they were often the best of a bad bunch, and all other people and nations would do the same if they could anyway.
iirc Flashman describes the (genocidal, remember) war of US government versus native American Indians as something that just happens when two strong people quarrel over land, and makes sure to go into just how disgusting the Indian tortures were. Likewise he excuses the looting and burning of Beojing and the Chinese imperial palace by detailed description of how some British (sepoy iirc) soldiers were tortured to death by chinese authorities. The fact that all this takes place in the context of imperial aggression and colonisation is excused - because the chinese, the souix, etc would have done the same to europe if they could, any way, and do you really think the French would hold back if the English got an attack of the holy joes, eh?
iirc Flashman describes the (genocidal, remember) war of US government versus native American Indians as something that just happens when two strong people quarrel over land, and makes sure to go into just how disgusting the Indian tortures were. Likewise he excuses the looting and burning of Beojing and the Chinese imperial palace by detailed description of how some British (sepoy iirc) soldiers were tortured to death by chinese authorities. The fact that all this takes place in the context of imperial aggression and colonisation is excused - because the chinese, the souix, etc would have done the same to europe if they could, any way, and do you really think the French would hold back if the English got an attack of the holy joes, eh?





