Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Daft to invite traitor Prince Charles to D-Day event.

that is one ugly ugly website, yo

Its fucking ugly. Its a complete distillation of MySpace and 1990's design. (In fact it is a time warp "The time is now : 26 Dec 10:34 am").

"Gift idea!

Properly bound as a document, the pages of this website would make a rather unique gift for someone who likes a good read!"

Only if you wanted to induce an epileptic fit on the receiver...!
 
I like how they all remember Culloden whereas english people couldn't put a name to any of the many many times we pwnt them back in the day
 
I walked the Culloden battlefield a couple of weeks ago. It was absolutely pissing down and I was thinking of whingeing about this until I reflected that at least people weren't firing muskets and grapeshot at me.
 
I notice you're from Aberdeen. What's your position on the loss of Scottish Oil to your nation.
Well you are correct to assume that my nation is the Scots; after all, my website is entitled, "Peter Dow's Scottish National Standard Bearer" website.

However, I would like to mention my dual nationality - I also consider myself a Briton. I consider myself both Scottish and British.

However, my British nationality is not like most Britons who are more easily brainwashed by the BBC as they tell us what "being British" means.

As a republican I reject the United Kingdom, hate the fact that my passport is a "UK" one and never sing "God Save the Queen".

I have been known to fly the union flag though I oppose the treaty of union which founded the United Kingdom. I still believe that there is much for us on this island to unite around, though not the UK.

For me, the Union Flag or Union Jack is the flag of the British nation which is bigger and better than the UK could ever be.

It is a disappointment to me that both the Scots and the Britons have so far accepted a situation where the UK state is the master which enslaves the nations associated with this island.

It seems to me that the nations could if they so chose have a republican revolution to overthrow the UK and establish democratic republics but we have not done so yet.

I am questioning my fellow Scots and Britons why they settle for a state which rules the nations instead of being the servant of the nations which it would have to be if we democratically elected presidents as heads of republican states.

This page in my website goes some way to explain what I love about my fellow Britons and hate about the UK.
Threats from the United Kingdom (U.K.)

Much of the "Scottish oil", (if by that I presume you mean oil extracted from waters closer to Scotland than any other country), has been wasted though not lost altogether.

We Scots and Britons may be enslaved by the UK state but the UK state has spent some of its tax revenue on services for the people - health and welfare and so on.

Much of the tax revenues have been wasted and abused on denying people democratic constitutional freedoms.

I just have a problem with the SNP who say "It's Scotland's oil" but then when you actually pin them down as to who SHOULD rule Scotland, they spit out "Queen Elizabeth".

So the SNP policy amounts to a policy of "It is Queen Elizabeth's oil, now and even after we get independence". In the same way as everything in Scotland - the land of the mountain and the flood - hills and glens - the courts, the prisons, the police - all belongs to Queen Elizabeth and her dynasty, according to the SNP.

The SNP are actually opposed to Scottish national independence because they want us to continue to be enslaved to that Queen and her successors as head of state.

The SNP want an independent Queen's state in Scotland to enslave the Scots much as we are enslaved already by the state under the Queen's First Minister, Alex Salmond, leader of the SNP.

I know you didn't ask about all that - you only asked about "Scotland's oil" but political issues are more complex and not addressed by slogans alone.

Of course the oil taxes should be used more wisely - for example, by only giving money to universities which open their door to all good students. Just now, the universities get the money even if they exclude good students such as myself. I spoke about this on BBC Radio Scotland.


So for example, the "Scottish oil" money is being spent on my welfare payments and on the salaries of university managers and professors who are banning me from the universities here in Aberdeen and money on lawyers and courts fees and police and security guards to threaten to have me arrested and jailed or perhaps sectioned in a mental hospital if I was to dare to try to attend university when the management don't want me there.

It would be wiser to spend the same money on sacking those bad university managers and spend it instead on better university staff who INCLUDE outspoken students.

The issue of whether it is Scotland's oil or Britain's oil doesn't really address the more important issue of the stupid way the tax revenues are being misused in a way which BETRAYS ALL THE NATIONS of the island.

Of course I want a free Scotland whereby a student was free to attend university without being banned. However, only a good president of a republic would do that - the Queen and her ministers could not care less if a good student is being banned from university.

Those royalist politicians WANT politically challenging people like me banned from university in case we were to gain political support for the needed republican revolution.

Having republicans like me included, means stupid royalist politicians lose support and they don't want that.

So the royalist politicians are all for wasting the oil money - whether the SNP get the sort of "independent" Scotland they want or not.
 
The UK royals would have been the first to surrender to Hitler

Ironically, the monarchy would have had an important role to play should Britain have been invaded in WWII.

If the Royal Family refused to surrender, even in exile, then the nazis wouldn't have had international legal recognition for a puppet government if the monarchy refused to accept it.
A big "If". The royal family would have been the first to surrender to the Nazis. Former King Edward, the Duke of Windsor would have happily been a Nazi puppet Quisling King of a Nazi-ruled United Kingdom.

howqueenelizabethgotmar.jpg


Wikipedia: Prince Christoph of Hesse

Wikipedia: Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom. Marriage

American Almanac: The Nazi Roots of the House of Windsor

Aftermath News: The Nazi relative that the Royals disowned

The Daily Express: PRINCE PHILIP AND THE NAZIS

The Royals and the Reich. The Princes von Hessen in Nazi Germany by Jonathan Petropoulos

royalnazibooks600.jpg


Jonathan Petropoulos, in his book "Royals and the Reich" reviews the case that the Duke of Windsor was a traitor and an agent for Nazi Germany which was made by Martin Allen in his book "Hidden Agenda. How the Duke of Windsor Betrayed the Allies".

Author Martin Allen goes much further than this, arguing in his controversial book, Hidden Agenda, that the duke spied for Hitler, especially in the critical phase in late-1939 and early-1940 prior to the Battle of France.

According to Allen, the duke made inspection tours of the French army's front line positions, including the Maginot line, and provided reports of troop deployments not only to the British (French-British co-operation not being what it should have been), but also to the Germans.

The link between the duke and the Nazis, according to Allen, was wealthy American industrialist Charles Bedaux (sometimes spelled Bedault), who was a close friend of the Windsors. Bedaux had loaned them his home, chateau Cande in France, for their wedding in June 1937, and he was almost certainly a Nazi intelligence asset; he knew Goring personally and had many German business contacts.

Martin Allen goes so far as to argue that the Duke of Windsor provided Bedaux with the crucial information about the French deployment, that this information, when passed on, induced Hitler to take the bold move and invade France through the poorly defended Ardennes forest, and that this is the primary explanation for the stunning Nazi victory in May-June 1940.

It is a devastating indictment: the Duke of Windsor was not only a traitor but the main reason for the German victory in the West and all that came with it (occupation, the Battle of Britain, and the persecution of Jews in these regions, among other developments).

Indeed sometimes this country looks a bit like we DID surrender to the Nazis and their way of doing things.

 

"I would though consider taking on a woman who would be bringing her children from a previous relationship with her to stay with us - so long as my woman is ready to conceive right away and is prepared to deliver my children to create our new family. My woman's daughters would be particularly welcome but I won't allow a woman's teenage or older sons to move in with me as I don't want to have to deal with testosterone-fuelled conflicts with rival young men in my own household."

:eek:

:hmm:

:D
 
BBC: Obama wants Queen at D-Day event
The White House spokesman the other day was all in favour of the French inviting Queen Elizabeth to Normandy for the 65th anniversary commemoration of the D-Day Normandy invasion to liberate Europe and to defeat the Nazis.

It is daft for the US to want the Queen invited, to anything! Stupid!

Obama is going to this D-day event on the coast of France. Sarkozy's going. Brown is going. Apparently there has been some mix up leading to no timely invite for the Queen. Good! She should be banned from attending - as should all members of the UK royal family.

The Queen should not be invited.

Americans have got monarchy to blame for the Al Qaeda 9/11 attacks provoked, encouraged or otherwise caused by monarchs and dictators in "Muslim" countries.

The Queen's Uncle Edward, the Duke of Windsor and ex-King was a Nazi sympathiser who is thought to have spied and leaked to the Nazis the deployments of the French forces which enabled the Wehrmacht to penetrate the Maginot line through the Ardennes and led ultimately to the fall of France.

Queen Elizabeth's husband Philip - his sister married a Nazi SS Colonel.

The monarchy is the enemy - they hate democracy and republics which have no need of royalty and the royals love and support what the Nazis did to their German republican critics - exterminate them as they would exterminate us if they could.

So wake up America!

Stop inviting the Queen to things! The worst was when Bush invited the Queen to the White House!

The Queen's predecessors as monarchs allowed the sabotaging of the British army to the point where we could not even easily defend our nearest and best ally France.

All the deaths of WW2 have to be blamed on the UK monarchy for allowing a British world power built not on monarchy but on the genius of the industrial revolution to fall into disrepair and disorganisation and ending up as a runt hapless army that got kicked out of Europe at Dunkirk.

The industrial revolution should have been followed by a republican revolution so the British military would have become a republican force for democracy world-wide as the US military is today.

To keep Britain as a Kingdom was to sabotage the British army long term, so even admitting that the Queen changed the wheels on a few army trucks in World War 2, the whole army was and is today still weakened by monarchy.

So that makes the Queen and her family traitors.

If the royals want to help the British military today then they should go into exile.

Well it looks like instead of the traitor Queen Elizabeth, her traitor son, the Traitor Prince Charles will be allowed to attend the D-day event - just as bad, just as stupid.

BBC: Charles invited to D-Day events
you HAVE heard of the concept of a 'prime minister' haven't you? y'know, DLG, balfour, baldwin, Chamberlain etc?
As one anti-royalist to another, ta for the own goal.:(
 
Waist-to-hips ratio

This table describes my preferred maximum waists and the corresponding minimum hips dimensions in a woman. If a woman's hips are at least 1.25 times as big as her waist then fine.

For example, an ideal measurement for a woman might be if she had a waist of around 29 inches (74cm) and hips of around 39 inches (99cm) because 39 divided by 29 equals 1.34 which is easily bigger than 1.25.

Waist Hips
maximum minimum
inches cm inches cm
24 61 30 76
26 66 32.5 82
28 71 35 89
30 76 37.5 95
32 81 40 101
34 86 42.5 108
36 91 45 114


oh my
 
My dearest Condi,
I’ve been hinting at my love for you for quite a while now on my Scottish National Standard Bearer website and now, after your recent visit to Britain, I’ve been proud to declare my feelings for you in no uncertain terms.

OK it’s perhaps a bit soon to propose to you since we’ve never actually met but, hey, neither of us are getting any younger (I’m 44) and so I thought I’d better pop the question. Will you marry me?
To be honest, I’m not too hopeful that you’ll say “yes” but in case you want further information, telephone me on ......

oh my, x 1 million
 
Royalist Prime Ministers appease Nazis and other fascists

you HAVE heard of the concept of a 'prime minister' haven't you? y'know, DLG, balfour, baldwin, Chamberlain etc?
As one anti-royalist to another, ta for the own goal.:(
The concept of Prime Minister of Her Majesty's Government? Yes I have heard of that.

DLG? David Lloyd George? Yes I HAVE heard of him.

jimwallancesincelloydge.jpg


My webpage - Scottish Liberal Democrat Failings

Strange you didn't mention Churchill in this context of this topic about the 65th anniversary of D-Day which he ordered and planned. He at least was a Prime Minister who fought the Nazis.

Not only did I mention Churchill but he got a whole page on my website!

Winston Churchill, 8th May 1945

Now OK Churchill was a royalist but he was enough of a freedom fighter to be a hero of sorts to British republicans so I also included his voice in this British Republican video of mine.

 
Please link to your content instead of cutnpasting it all over the boards please.
 
I live off welfare and have done for years - it is a reliable, though low, income which increases to a couple's allowance if I can find a partner who is "habitually resident in the UK" - lived for years in Scotland, England, Wales or Northern Ireland. I am pro-Scottish of course but actually most of my previous lady friends have come from outside Scotland originally.

Of course, welfare here does pay extra for children and so I can afford to bring up kids no problem. A woman with no kids of her own yet but keen to start a family would be ideal.

Peter, you are a fool, living off the state (where most of that money comes from is England) and asking for a wife so you can increase your wad of money for nothing. Oh and kids will be good too, cos I'll get extra for that, great!!! You are not worthy of your passport and citizenship. It should be given to someone who deserves it pal. Oh, I shouldn't berate the mentally ill though should I.

Someone tell me, is this all a joke and very post post-modern??? Please tell me it's not for real.
 
Peter, you are a fool, living off the state (where most of that money comes from is England) and asking for a wife so you can increase your wad of money for nothing. Oh and kids will be good too, cos I'll get extra for that, great!!! You are not worthy of your passport and citizenship. It should be given to someone who deserves it pal. Oh, I shouldn't berate the mentally ill though should I.

Someone tell me, is this all a joke and very post post-modern??? Please tell me it's not for real.

Stop being cynical he is a braveheart indeed, I am sending links to his site to my friends right now :)
 
The concept of Prime Minister of Her Majesty's Government? Yes I have heard of that.

DLG? David Lloyd George? Yes I HAVE heard of him.

jimwallancesincelloydge.jpg


My webpage - Scottish Liberal Democrat Failings

Strange you didn't mention Churchill in this context of this topic about the 65th anniversary of D-Day which he ordered and planned. He at least was a Prime Minister who fought the Nazis.

Not only did I mention Churchill but he got a whole page on my website!

Winston Churchill, 8th May 1945

Now OK Churchill was a royalist but he was enough of a freedom fighter to be a hero of sorts to British republicans so I also included his voice in this British Republican video of mine.


the point being the nature of a constitutional monarchy.
 
Oh Dow, Dow

Do you ever wonder how,
The benefits of your wisdom should be spread?

be%20manure%20spreader.jpg


Try one of these

"Hey ho, the folks all know, hes the champion dung spreader":D
 
mad porridge wog will probably die of a heart attack soon:rolleyes:.
Phil the Greek actually helped kill a fair number of nazi's liz drove some trucks during the war so both should be there.

preferably point out to that sarcozy cunt it not a American french thing.
its a British/American thing.

7000 ships two floating harbours and an undersea fuel pipeline.
if your leaving the world stage going out taking down the nazi's is not a bad way to bow out.
 
Back
Top Bottom