They are when you call them 'Scotch'.
that is one ugly ugly website, yo
Angry, angry people, the Scotch![]()
Well you are correct to assume that my nation is the Scots; after all, my website is entitled, "Peter Dow's Scottish National Standard Bearer" website.I notice you're from Aberdeen. What's your position on the loss of Scottish Oil to your nation.
They are when you call them 'Scotch'.

A big "If". The royal family would have been the first to surrender to the Nazis. Former King Edward, the Duke of Windsor would have happily been a Nazi puppet Quisling King of a Nazi-ruled United Kingdom.Ironically, the monarchy would have had an important role to play should Britain have been invaded in WWII.
If the Royal Family refused to surrender, even in exile, then the nazis wouldn't have had international legal recognition for a puppet government if the monarchy refused to accept it.
Author Martin Allen goes much further than this, arguing in his controversial book, Hidden Agenda, that the duke spied for Hitler, especially in the critical phase in late-1939 and early-1940 prior to the Battle of France.
According to Allen, the duke made inspection tours of the French army's front line positions, including the Maginot line, and provided reports of troop deployments not only to the British (French-British co-operation not being what it should have been), but also to the Germans.
The link between the duke and the Nazis, according to Allen, was wealthy American industrialist Charles Bedaux (sometimes spelled Bedault), who was a close friend of the Windsors. Bedaux had loaned them his home, chateau Cande in France, for their wedding in June 1937, and he was almost certainly a Nazi intelligence asset; he knew Goring personally and had many German business contacts.
Martin Allen goes so far as to argue that the Duke of Windsor provided Bedaux with the crucial information about the French deployment, that this information, when passed on, induced Hitler to take the bold move and invade France through the poorly defended Ardennes forest, and that this is the primary explanation for the stunning Nazi victory in May-June 1940.
It is a devastating indictment: the Duke of Windsor was not only a traitor but the main reason for the German victory in the West and all that came with it (occupation, the Battle of Britain, and the persecution of Jews in these regions, among other developments).
Peter...! Wear some trewsers...! http://scot.extroverthost.com/lookingforawoman.htm



you HAVE heard of the concept of a 'prime minister' haven't you? y'know, DLG, balfour, baldwin, Chamberlain etc?BBC: Obama wants Queen at D-Day event
The White House spokesman the other day was all in favour of the French inviting Queen Elizabeth to Normandy for the 65th anniversary commemoration of the D-Day Normandy invasion to liberate Europe and to defeat the Nazis.
It is daft for the US to want the Queen invited, to anything! Stupid!
Obama is going to this D-day event on the coast of France. Sarkozy's going. Brown is going. Apparently there has been some mix up leading to no timely invite for the Queen. Good! She should be banned from attending - as should all members of the UK royal family.
The Queen should not be invited.
Americans have got monarchy to blame for the Al Qaeda 9/11 attacks provoked, encouraged or otherwise caused by monarchs and dictators in "Muslim" countries.
The Queen's Uncle Edward, the Duke of Windsor and ex-King was a Nazi sympathiser who is thought to have spied and leaked to the Nazis the deployments of the French forces which enabled the Wehrmacht to penetrate the Maginot line through the Ardennes and led ultimately to the fall of France.
Queen Elizabeth's husband Philip - his sister married a Nazi SS Colonel.
The monarchy is the enemy - they hate democracy and republics which have no need of royalty and the royals love and support what the Nazis did to their German republican critics - exterminate them as they would exterminate us if they could.
So wake up America!
Stop inviting the Queen to things! The worst was when Bush invited the Queen to the White House!
The Queen's predecessors as monarchs allowed the sabotaging of the British army to the point where we could not even easily defend our nearest and best ally France.
All the deaths of WW2 have to be blamed on the UK monarchy for allowing a British world power built not on monarchy but on the genius of the industrial revolution to fall into disrepair and disorganisation and ending up as a runt hapless army that got kicked out of Europe at Dunkirk.
The industrial revolution should have been followed by a republican revolution so the British military would have become a republican force for democracy world-wide as the US military is today.
To keep Britain as a Kingdom was to sabotage the British army long term, so even admitting that the Queen changed the wheels on a few army trucks in World War 2, the whole army was and is today still weakened by monarchy.
So that makes the Queen and her family traitors.
If the royals want to help the British military today then they should go into exile.
Well it looks like instead of the traitor Queen Elizabeth, her traitor son, the Traitor Prince Charles will be allowed to attend the D-day event - just as bad, just as stupid.
BBC: Charles invited to D-Day events

Peter...! Wear some trewsers...! http://scot.extroverthost.com/lookingforawoman.htm



Waist-to-hips ratio
This table describes my preferred maximum waists and the corresponding minimum hips dimensions in a woman. If a woman's hips are at least 1.25 times as big as her waist then fine.
For example, an ideal measurement for a woman might be if she had a waist of around 29 inches (74cm) and hips of around 39 inches (99cm) because 39 divided by 29 equals 1.34 which is easily bigger than 1.25.
Waist Hips
maximum minimum
inches cm inches cm
24 61 30 76
26 66 32.5 82
28 71 35 89
30 76 37.5 95
32 81 40 101
34 86 42.5 108
36 91 45 114

My dearest Condi,
I’ve been hinting at my love for you for quite a while now on my Scottish National Standard Bearer website and now, after your recent visit to Britain, I’ve been proud to declare my feelings for you in no uncertain terms.
OK it’s perhaps a bit soon to propose to you since we’ve never actually met but, hey, neither of us are getting any younger (I’m 44) and so I thought I’d better pop the question. Will you marry me?
To be honest, I’m not too hopeful that you’ll say “yes” but in case you want further information, telephone me on ......
The concept of Prime Minister of Her Majesty's Government? Yes I have heard of that.you HAVE heard of the concept of a 'prime minister' haven't you? y'know, DLG, balfour, baldwin, Chamberlain etc?
As one anti-royalist to another, ta for the own goal.![]()
Peter you are an internet unhinged person of the old school
And a traitor to boot. Republicanism, indeed.
Peter...! Wear some trewsers...! http://scot.extroverthost.com/lookingforawoman.htm
I live off welfare and have done for years - it is a reliable, though low, income which increases to a couple's allowance if I can find a partner who is "habitually resident in the UK" - lived for years in Scotland, England, Wales or Northern Ireland. I am pro-Scottish of course but actually most of my previous lady friends have come from outside Scotland originally.
Of course, welfare here does pay extra for children and so I can afford to bring up kids no problem. A woman with no kids of her own yet but keen to start a family would be ideal.
Peter, you are a fool, living off the state (where most of that money comes from is England) and asking for a wife so you can increase your wad of money for nothing. Oh and kids will be good too, cos I'll get extra for that, great!!! You are not worthy of your passport and citizenship. It should be given to someone who deserves it pal. Oh, I shouldn't berate the mentally ill though should I.
Someone tell me, is this all a joke and very post post-modern??? Please tell me it's not for real.

The concept of Prime Minister of Her Majesty's Government? Yes I have heard of that.
DLG? David Lloyd George? Yes I HAVE heard of him.
![]()
My webpage - Scottish Liberal Democrat Failings
Strange you didn't mention Churchill in this context of this topic about the 65th anniversary of D-Day which he ordered and planned. He at least was a Prime Minister who fought the Nazis.
Not only did I mention Churchill but he got a whole page on my website!
Winston Churchill, 8th May 1945
Now OK Churchill was a royalist but he was enough of a freedom fighter to be a hero of sorts to British republicans so I also included his voice in this British Republican video of mine.
.mad porridge wog will probably die of a heart attack soon