maomao said:Yes, now we have cycle paths to speak of but unfortunately not to actually use because they either don't actually go anywhere or they're blocked with parked cars or broken glass.
One can only hope things improve. i love biking around.
maomao said:Yes, now we have cycle paths to speak of but unfortunately not to actually use because they either don't actually go anywhere or they're blocked with parked cars or broken glass.
pinkychukkles said:I think you're totally sounding off in the wrong place, if that's all you can say. Another entirely negative post - it's not like you qualified your opening post with how this situation came about?or bothered to even differentiate between those cyclist that do offer good consideration. You've posted your crap on here trying to get a rise out of the cyclists (and possibly bring other car-lovin' cycle haterzzzz out of the woodwork here to boot) to just make yourself feel better by shouting a few generalisations about and the overwhelming odds are that no cyclist on here was the one that yelled at you today.
How about if you go the same route everyday, you keep an eye out because there's a chance that you may, ahem, *bump* into him again.
Like I said, just another negative post that doesn't do this board any favours. What is the matter with people? THINK before you post, the polarisation and intolerance on urban these days just seems to mimicing what's happening on the streets - sort it out!

LJo said:So your fury stems from these two events:
1. You ignored the fact that cyclists have right of way on a cycle path.
2. You objected to a cyclist warning you she was approaching on a bridleway.
From which I deduce that you really don't have enough to think about. Have you considered campaigning against overtly intrusive wheelie bins? Might keep you occupied for a bit. You could make posters and everything.
Brilliant!William of Walworth said:PS I also do think, strongly, that other cyclists who DO shoot lights, ignore pedestrians, ride recklessly on pavements, etc. are total twats
maomao said:Yes, now we have cycle paths to speak of but unfortunately not to actually use because they either don't actually go anywhere or they're blocked with parked cars or broken glass.
He's got a point there, and it's something that fucks me off no end about some cyclists. It's particularly noticeable on the canal towpath in camden - most of the cyclists expect pedestrians to get out their wayjcsd said:The point is these are excatly the sort of people who whinge about how cars treat them on the road (and that's fiar I used to cycle alot, so I know it's true), but you put them anywhere near pedestarins and they behave exactly the same.

It's particularly noticeable on the canal towpath in camden - most of the cyclists expect pedestrians to get out their way
).gsv said:He's got a point there, and it's something that fucks me off no end about some cyclists. It's particularly noticeable on the canal towpath in camden - most of the cyclists expect pedestrians to get out their way![]()

gsv said:[1] He's got a point there, and it's something that fucks me off no end about some cyclists. It's particularly noticeable on the canal towpath in camden - most of the cyclists expect pedestrians to get out their way
[2] So good point, but that still doesn't make this anything but a fuckspuddy thread.
GS(v)

Wookey said:I think part of the problem is people in general don't notice cycle lanes, or take them seriously. Cars use them as car-parks, and they don't get a ticket for it, so they abuse an already poor system by blocking it up.
Likewise, pedestrians don't see it as a true traffic lane, which it is, and go wandering all over it, in a way they wouldn't do on a road with cars (some misplaced sense of invincibility perhaps....).
If there was a dedicated cycle system in London, say, with a north-south spoke and an east-west spoke, and it was properly patrolled and policed, then people's respect and awareness for cycle lanes would increase, along with safety. But the mayor has to take cycle lanes seriously too, to lead by example, and he hasn't done thus far.
Manchester's cycle routes are similarly daft in places, 10-foot cycle lanes that lead into walls, etc. But I'd hazard a guess it's more complete than London's.


pinkychukkles said:Or as happened to Tricky Mickey in the not so distant past on the same towpath when he neared the Dalston end, cycled behind some yoot, who parted to let him through then as he was passing them, pushed him off the sadal, into the canal then nicked his bike!![]()
![]()
possibly. we've got great arses though!ernestolynch said:Are push-bike users insane?

pk said:I still have fond memories of my days as a cycle courier in Central London... the amount of city twat boy-racer BMW and Mercedes windscreens I cracked with my D-Lock barrel at the traffic lights after the cunts cut me up... ahh... sweet, must have cost them thousands of pounds all told.
Hint to drivers - don't fuck with cycle couriers if you like your windscreens, oh, and there's fuck all you can do about it because we're quicker than you across town - and we don't have numberplates.
The ones to watch are the ones who don't carry the company bags so you don't even know the firm they work for.
![]()
In London, bikes rule, fuck the cars.