jæd said:A pedestrian crossing a road is perfectly acceptable under the Highway Code. A cyclist abiding by the same Code can't ignore traffic direction if they feel like it...
baldrick said:the POINT is that the drivers drove badly and the cyclists overreacted. that doesn't give anyone the right to use or threaten physical violence.

jæd said:A pedestrian crossing a road is perfectly acceptable under the Highway Code. A cyclist abiding by the same Code can't ignore traffic direction if they feel like it...
Oh come on...catrina said:I read your initial post as if you were actually walking up this one-way street, not crossing it, which I couldn't quite understand. You're right, but still, it's bad practice to walk out into streets without looking.
catrina said:I think most pedestrians rely on their hearing rather than actually looking before crossing the streets, which is totally unreliable for hearing an oncoming cyclist.

Absolutely. Assuming other people are going to obey the rules is a quick route to fuckup city2wheeledathiest said:Always assume that the driver/ped/other cyclist is going to do the `wrong' thing and prepare accordingly......
catrina said:Why?
Presumably it's self defense. Most cyclists shouting are doing it because it's the umpteenth time that someone has done something similar and it's really frustrating, particularly because getting in an accident on a bike, which can be caused by sudden braking as you suggest, almost always involves bodily harm. Whereas a pedestrian stepping backwards, or a motorist slowing down or even braking, is rarely at risk of injury.
I think it's this fear of bodily harm, coupled with the rushing adrenaline you are experiencing while you're cycling (which motorists and pedestrians do not experience) that drive cyclists to be more verbally raged than others.
jæd said:What about cyclists who ride up one-way-streets the wrong way. And then curse at pedestrians (ie me) who don't think people are foolish enough to do so...?
2wheeledathiest said:Always assume that the driver/ped/other cyclist is going to do the `wrong' thing and prepare accordingly......
Mikey77 said:Well as a justification for road rage or "cyclist rage" you make your case clearly. This is no different than justifying road rage on the basis that the driver has had a bad day and since it was the 6th time that day he had to have a go at the other driver or pedestrian.
Again, you ignore the point I made, the cyclist was going slow and did not even have to hit the brakes suddenly, she could easily have stopped but didn't want to. You seem to be giving me situations you have seen or experienced, which don't relate to the incident that happened to me.
I think someone else asked why I didn't apologise. I didn't argue, and calmly said to her (despite her attempt at having a go) "OK, go on then" but she continued with her tirade. I never asked for sympathy and admitted I was wrong in from the start, but people want to make excuses for cyclists in general without knowing the particulars of what happened.
Mikey77 said:Well as a justification for road rage or "cyclist rage" you make your case clearly. This is no different than justifying road rage on the basis that the driver has had a bad day and since it was the 6th time that day he had to have a go at the other driver or pedestrian.
catrina said:I wasn't excusing it. You asked for an explanation, I put forward mine.
On the same token, you haven't provided the best example of why cyclist rage is so wrong, since you admit you were in the wrong. If someone had nearly hit you at a zebra crossing and then proceeded to yell, then that's a different story.

Mikey77 said:I believe cyclist rage, or any rage is wrong when it is completely out of proportion to the incident.
jæd said:@ cyclists who are stupid tossers and ruin it for everyone else...

The Bristol cycletrack is currently flooded with idiot cyclists - double overtaking and going two-up round blind bends. I have recently cursed at more of them than cars... pro-rata they're much worse.laptop said:At that spot, it's about 5% fucker cyclists.![]()
Unidentifiable and anonymous = freedom to take the piss maybe.gentlegreen said:... pro-rata they're much worse.
A swinging bag of some sort dents doors quite nicely in these circuimstances ... something like an attaché case ...laptop said:I've taken to crossing Theobald's Road with my fist out in front of me, the instant the light goes green for me.

So, unless there are two SpookyFrank's posting, you DON'T believe that there is ever any right to kill in self-defence but you DO believe that there is a right to cause criminal damage.SpookyFrank said:On one or two occasions I have inflicted on the spot fines on dangerous motorists, usually by removing a wing mirror. This is of course a response to anger but I've only ever done it when someone has wilfully endangered my life, and in that situation taking action yourself is the only way to punish a dangerous and reckless driver.

catrina said:I didn't say it excused it. You were asking why it happened, I was trying to put forth an explanation as to why cyclists experience 'cycle rage.' It's not always justified, sometimes it just happens. Fortunately it's usually just words. Get over it!
detective-boy said:So, unless there are two SpookyFrank's posting, you DON'T believe that there is ever any right to kill in self-defence but you DO believe that there is a right to cause criminal damage.
Well, that clear's it up. Not.![]()
