That's not much different to the road rules - ie give way to pedestrians crossing
Highway Code Rule 7 D) said:D. If traffic is coming, let it pass. Look all around again and listen. Do not cross until there is a safe gap in the traffic and you are certain that there is plenty of time. Remember, even if traffic is a long way off, it may be approaching very quickly.
Highway Code said:Routes shared with cyclists. Some cycle tracks run alongside footpaths or pavements, using a segregating feature to separate cyclists from people on foot. Segregated routes may also incorporate short lengths of tactile paving to help visually impaired people stay on the correct side. On the pedestrian side this will comprise a series of flat-topped bars running across the direction of travel (ladder pattern). On the cyclist side the same bars are orientated in the direction of travel (tramline pattern). Not all routes which are shared with cyclists are segregated. Take extra care where this is so (see Rule 62).
Highway Code said:Cyclists and pedestrians may be segregated or they may share the same space (unsegregated). When using segregated tracks you MUST keep to the side intended for cyclists as the pedestrian side remains a pavement or footpath. Take care when passing pedestrians, especially children, older or disabled people, and allow them plenty of room. Always be prepared to slow down and stop if necessary. Take care near road junctions as you may have difficulty seeing other road users, who might not notice you.
of course it can. TC did an interesting thread recently on the shared street proposals for kensington high st, which touched on many pertinent issues.mutual consideration is the key to so many problems, shame it's so rare. surely good design can go some way to helping things for VIPs?
exactly, cycling in Netherlands is a pleasure.
Mainly 'cause it's flat........

of course it can. TC did an interesting thread recently on the shared street proposals for kensington high st, which touched on many pertinent issues.
3 signs every meter might be a bit too close imo, you'd have a hell of a time getting in or out of the lane if there was any trouble..Didn't see this and may act a touch ignorant on the point and am going a touch off topic but Kensington High Street? - isn't that the one with all of the stainless steel street furniture that VIP's can't see that well (believe TfL's Street Furniture guide may actually mention this as well). Nice....
Also the point above about green paint - at about £20 a square meter all in inclusively, and the cost of a fatality around £78,000 - great use of money in a recession as an alternative to people using their eyes.
Signs - the cyclists preferred design standard of choice suggests using signs at 300mm which people may miss. The accepted best practice suggests using them at 450mm. If someone can't see a 450mm diameter sign I seriously suggest joining the VIP crowd. To put it bluntly, clutter shouldn't even come into it. Until people start to use their eyes, and when they can't be bothered to look call the "no win, no fee brigade" engineers have to design for morons.
3 signs every meter might be a bit too close imo, you'd have a hell of a time getting in or out of the lane if there was any trouble..

Irony fail.post read fail![]()

post read fail![]()
Mainly 'cause it's flat........
