Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Crossing picket lines - is it ever ok?

No worries VP. The reality is that they probably wouldn't dismiss the whole workforce for showing solidarity, but there's a risk.

It would be interesting to know the constitution/rules of the National Negotiating Forum re strike action etc.
 
If that's referring to our situation, the NJF employers' side refuses to discuss anything other than pay and a few token statements on equality issues.
 
I don't think I've ever commented on KBJ's workplace. Are you thinking of someone else?

Mass sickie is one tactic but we've also been told that any sickness on the strike day will require a doctor's note.

I don't think you can even get a doctors note for one day's absence. Doesn't it have to be three days.

Even if you wanted to you'd have sod all chance of getting a same day appointment.

There's no way that can be fair.
 
I expect all of the individual colleges do, yes.

I'm assuming there isn't a separate vehicle for information and consultation with the workforce in the more complete sense than how you described the role of the NJF.

So a way of applying pressure back on to the employers if they try and intimidate re these picket lines would be to get 10% of the workforce (cross union and non union) to request that the employer makes arrangements for a fuller version of information and consultation - either by extending the role of the NJF or by having a separate vehicle for it. It would help for the future and be a pain for the employer in return.

More here: http://www.berr.gov.uk/employment/employment-legislation/ice/index.html
 
I think that for a lot of people if they are faced with the situation of cross the picket line and earn or don't cross and lose a job I think most people would say fuck the pickets and cross.

Sad but thats modern working life for you.

In my old man's time crossing the line meant a whole lot more than just being called scab.
 
It's worth having a good read up of it & links there. As a piece of legislation it seems to be under utilised by TUs and non unionised employees at.

there was an interesting article in the last Labour Research about the ICE regs and how they were affecting organising & negotiating practises. Many TU's have been hesitant to call on them as they could be seen as undermining existing TU agreements. That doesn't seem top have been much of a problem so far, as most of the non-union 'reps' are shown up as bloody useless compared to the trained and experienced union bods.
 
In my old man's time crossing the line meant a whole lot more than just being called scab.

But that was then this is now. Attitudes have changed a lot. Some of these changes in legislation and attitude are for the better such as the abolition of the closed shop and others have been devastatingly negative such as the secondary picketing ban and the general reduction in voluntary workplace solidarity.
 
What was so wrong with the closed shop? At least we didn't have to waste time and energy trying to persuade people of the benefits of trade unions, and at least we had no free loaders who benefit from the collective bargaining without paying their subs.

I am not convinced that the secondary picketing ban has been "devastatingly negative", though, since all it means, in effect, is that workers can only picket their own workplace. That would be fine if there were enough people to picket/strike, which there would be, if there was a closed shop.

Also, there would be more "workplace solidarity" if people were automatically a member of the trade union, as in a closed shop.

The trade union would be more likely to speak for the full workforce if there was a closed shop, so that everyone had an interest in what was being said in their name....
 
there was an interesting article in the last Labour Research about the ICE regs and how they were affecting organising & negotiating practises. Many TU's have been hesitant to call on them as they could be seen as undermining existing TU agreements. That doesn't seem top have been much of a problem so far, as most of the non-union 'reps' are shown up as bloody useless compared to the trained and experienced union bods.

See, I'd see them as a way of strengthening and extending TU negotiating bodies/agreements where they're already in place. Yeah, it's in the interests of employers to keep the non-union reps untrained innit.
 
What was so wrong with the closed shop? At least we didn't have to waste time and energy trying to persuade people of the benefits of trade unions, and at least we had no free loaders who benefit from the collective bargaining without paying their subs.

I am not convinced that the secondary picketing ban has been "devastatingly negative", though, since all it means, in effect, is that workers can only picket their own workplace. That would be fine if there were enough people to picket/strike, which there would be, if there was a closed shop.

Also, there would be more "workplace solidarity" if people were automatically a member of the trade union, as in a closed shop.

The trade union would be more likely to speak for the full workforce if there was a closed shop, so that everyone had an interest in what was being said in their name....



I had the misfortune to work for the press prior to the Wapping revolution and saw and had to deal with the closed shop and that turned me off it for life.

On one occasion a photographer who owned his own wire machine but ran it himself instead of having an over paid NGA member doing it. This poor fucker was just trying to own a living but the unions had decreed that you needed to be an NGA member to operate what was in effect a glorified fax machine. The poor bastard lived in terror of the NGA finding out about this and blacklisting him. Also the print closed shops held back the introduction of new technology and caused Fleet Street to hang onto the hot metal process far far longer than really needed to.

Now I don't agree with how Murdoch broke the print unions but by fuck were changes needed in that game.

Also the TGWU closed shop at Fords in Dagenham on the delivery section ran a racist 'family connections' scheme for the allocation of all the best delivery jobs which meant that ethnic minority workers were never given a chance to apply for the better jobs.

The closed shop might look like a good idea in theory but its a disaster for workers and organisations.

If you can't convince people that its in their interests to join a union then its the union which has failed to sell the product to the worker. The closed shop just makes unions lazy if they don't have to work for their members.

The closed shop was a horrible abusive thing and its about the only thing in the Tories Employment Acts that I feel was any good. I'd repeal the rest of them tomorrow but keep the ban on the closed shop.
 
So, tell me, from your allegedly vast experience of trade unions, why you think the outlawing of secondary picketing is so "devastatingly negative"?
 
When you have done that, I wonder if you could also explain how all the examples you gave above related to the closed shop, because I don't see the connection.
 
So, tell me, from your allegedly vast experience of trade unions, why you think the outlawing of secondary picketing is so "devastatingly negative"?

Because to be effective not only should the main site of a employer in dispute be picketted but also subsiduries etc. If all a union can do is put six people outside one site then they may well not as well be there. Picketting subsiduraries and suppliers are also a way of informing the workers there of the nature of the main dispute.
 
Ah, but kbj thinks that secondary picketing should be reinstated. He is nothing if not inconsistent :D

Secondary picketting I don't have a problem with. The closed shop I do have a problem with as I've experienced it and fucking hated it for some of the reasons I gave above

If a union has to rely on a device like the closed shop then that particular union has lost the argument. If people have to be forced into a union it doesn't exactly do wonders for the idea of workers coming together in free association.

If you can't convince the workers to join freely and without threat then there is something wrong with whats being offered.
 
I had the misfortune to work for the press prior to the Wapping revolution and saw and had to deal with the closed shop and that turned me off it for life.

On one occasion a photographer who owned his own wire machine but ran it himself instead of having an over paid NGA member doing it. This poor fucker was just trying to own a living but the unions had decreed that you needed to be an NGA member to operate what was in effect a glorified fax machine. The poor bastard lived in terror of the NGA finding out about this and blacklisting him. Also the print closed shops held back the introduction of new technology and caused Fleet Street to hang onto the hot metal process far far longer than really needed to.

Now I don't agree with how Murdoch broke the print unions but by fuck were changes needed in that game.

Also the TGWU closed shop at Fords in Dagenham on the delivery section ran a racist 'family connections' scheme for the allocation of all the best delivery jobs which meant that ethnic minority workers were never given a chance to apply for the better jobs.

The closed shop might look like a good idea in theory but its a disaster for workers and organisations.

If you can't convince people that its in their interests to join a union then its the union which has failed to sell the product to the worker. The closed shop just makes unions lazy if they don't have to work for their members.

The closed shop was a horrible abusive thing and its about the only thing in the Tories Employment Acts that I feel was any good. I'd repeal the rest of them tomorrow but keep the ban on the closed shop.

mate you get this totally upside down .. are you against freedom of speech cos nazis abuse it?? are you against alcohol cos peoplel abuse it??? yes people ABUSED the closed shop ( we live in a depoliticised and selfish world) .. but the form of the union, closed shop and strike are NOT themselves wrong and are inseperable. There is NO union without a closed shop and strikes .. THAT is why we have been fucked for the last 3 decades

you do go on about how bad fleet street was .. what do you expect them to do??? every other fucker in the city has a fucking closed shop .. why should we w/c people not have them to increase our price??? and they supportted the miners .. did you ?

you can NOT build a fairer society IF you deny people the blocks to build that society .. you are very nieve if you think it will just be done on good will

and the press is SOO much better now we have new technology isn't it??
 
kbj's anti-closed shop arguments are just as bollocks as the rest of his. They were bad because some poor bloke couldn't run his own business from inside the Times offices! poor lamb. And the Ford scheme would most likely have run whether or not the factory was a closed shop. Pure bollocks.

The abolition of the closed shop was just a great excuse for free loading twats to get something for nothing.
 
kbj's anti-closed shop arguments are just as bollocks as the rest of his. They were bad because some poor bloke couldn't run his own business from inside the Times offices! poor lamb. And the Ford scheme would most likely have run whether or not the factory was a closed shop. Pure bollocks.

and very likely made up bollocks (give the obvious timescales)
 
kbj's anti-closed shop arguments are just as bollocks as the rest of his. They were bad because some poor bloke couldn't run his own business from inside the Times offices! poor lamb. And the Ford scheme would most likely have run whether or not the factory was a closed shop. Pure bollocks.

The abolition of the closed shop was just a great excuse for free loading twats to get something for nothing.


Get yer fucking facts right. The photographer was an independent freelance who had the wire machine installed in his own premises.

The Ford TGWU scheme only operated because the TGWU were effectively recruiting workers for the plumb jobs.

The abolition of the closed shops forced unions to be more responsive to members.
 
and very likely made up bollocks (give the obvious timescales)

Rubbish as usual coming from you. To clarify. The fords thing carried on long after the closed shop was rightly abolished as a form of 'custom and practice' thing until it was challenged by ethnic minority workers in the courts.
 
Get yer fucking facts right. The photographer was an independent freelance who had the wire machine installed in his own premises.

The Ford TGWU scheme only operated because the TGWU were effectively recruiting workers for the plumb jobs.

The abolition of the closed shops forced unions to be more responsive to members.
like the PCS right? like all the other unions are soo responsive to their members?

sorry mate i think you are totally wrong on this. i appreciate your wariness of the abuses you have seen but you are denying people the tools to stop worse abuses by the bosses
 
Secondary picketting I don't have a problem with. The closed shop I do have a problem with as I've experienced it and fucking hated it for some of the reasons I gave above

If a union has to rely on a device like the closed shop then that particular union has lost the argument. If people have to be forced into a union it doesn't exactly do wonders for the idea of workers coming together in free association.

If you can't convince the workers to join freely and without threat then there is something wrong with whats being offered.


But I didn't understand how the examples you gave related to the closed shop, rather than just bad practice or bad organisation or, in one case, racism.

Do you accept that, if there was a closed shop, the union would, potentially, be more accountable to the workforce, rather than less?

What about freeloading? Do you think it's acceptable that people refuse to join a trade union, but are allowed to benefit from the hard work, and collective action of that union?
 
Rubbish as usual coming from you. To clarify. The fords thing carried on long after the closed shop was rightly abolished as a form of 'custom and practice' thing until it was challenged by ethnic minority workers in the courts.

so, you've just shown that it was implemented due to the closed shop! Well done :)
 
Back
Top Bottom