Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Crocs. Why?

i saw a woman on the tube wearing footless tights but they were a bit too tight and she had flesh burtsing out of the tights and the straps on her shoes as well. didnt look comfy
 
I have some old, dirty crocs and we just used a pair in my last show. I used to be a big fan, but my love affair has wound down. I dig 'em because they're colorful and they're not made of leather, but as I've changed my MO with respect to buying leather, I'm no longer as enthused about them. And they can be rather wobbly, it's true. Recently I bought a pair of these:

http://www.birkenstockusa.com/products/women/sandals/gizeh/mango-antique-leather/4384

but with white footbeds and soles, not brown

and they are far more supportive than crocs
 
Hatred of Crocs, for those that feel it, is atavstic, like a reaction to snakes or hornets. I'm with the h8rz quite honestly

And Blockaboots...yo ho ho...

POster - you could make yourself a LOT of money with those three ideas...
 
I saw some leaopard skin print footless tights in Peacocks today. I might get some to go with my pink crocs :cool:
 
D said:
I have some old, dirty crocs and we just used a pair in my last show. I used to be a big fan, but my love affair has wound down. I dig 'em because they're colorful and they're not made of leather, but as I've changed my MO with respect to buying leather, I'm no longer as enthused about them. And they can be rather wobbly, it's true. Recently I bought a pair of these:

http://www.birkenstockusa.com/products/women/sandals/gizeh/mango-antique-leather/4384

but with white footbeds and soles, not brown

and they are far more supportive than crocs

Birkies fuck my feet, they're not good for this over pronater.

Pronator?

Whatever.

Crocs ARE v comfy, but they also don't do anything for my over pronation.

So I wore them round the house for a bit, and then forgot about them.

AND they make my feet sweat, which they claim not to do.
 
milesy said:
i think it's *really* cool when you see a family with mum, dad and the kids all wearing them.

The funniest thing ever (well, recently) was when we saw two middle class families at opposite sides of the road in Clifton waiting to cross - each had the same number of kids with identical crocs on (pink), you could see both the mums cringing with embarrassment. It really amused me for the rest of the day.
 
They can be a bit slippy in the rain, but they're pretty handy in tropical climates. I've got some black prima ones (ballet shoe type) I can wear for work. I think of them as 'grown up plastic shoes you can scrub and hose down'. Anything else would be filthy and ruined within 5 feet of my front door. They're very popular here, in the sense that lots of people wear them rather than because they're fashionable.
 
I think that part of the appeal is that they offer some (although not enough IMO) arch support and people not used to buying shoes with integrated arch support find them very comfy without quite knowing why. They are also cheap and cheerful and don't look like orthopedic shoes.

I've collected and sold various elegant shoes from the 1940s and they all have very high quality leather linings with built in arch support. Even the high heeled shoes have a neatly stitched, padded insole providing arch support. Shoes were beautifully made back then and I wish more shoes were made like it today.
 
mango5 said:
They can be a bit slippy in the rain, but they're pretty handy in tropical climates. I've got some black prima ones (ballet shoe type) I can wear for work. I think of them as 'grown up plastic shoes you can scrub and hose down'. Anything else would be filthy and ruined within 5 feet of my front door. They're very popular here, in the sense that lots of people wear them rather than because they're fashionable.

I think some people tend to give Crocs wearers a bit of a hard time. Everyone I have ever spoken to about Crocs say they love them because they are so comfortable. They're not attractive shoes, there's no denying it, but if people are wearing them because they're comfortable, they are wearing them for the right reason.

Birkies are the same, fucking ugly :D
 
Flashman said:
Mortuary technicians have been wearing them for years, good for when bleaching down floors and the like.

No surely not - wearing shoes full of holes, in a mortuary? :eek:

I thought it was all white wellies? :confused:
 
you can get crocs wellies as well you now
was going to get some for shifty junior because they are washable,(even on the inside) and all that but i doubt they are very warm so maybe i will in summer
 
I think they are hideous and i tried a friends on after she went on about how comfi they are and there not!..they were too wide so my foot was slipping around and they feel heavy.
:confused:
 
twisted_angel said:
and they feel heavy.
:confused:

they are so damn light!
ive had people so many people pick them up i the last month to be amazed at how light they actually are compared to how they look.

for me, i almost live in my crocs. so damn comfy! its silly!

they are practical for camping, pre and post bike rides, nipping round the shops, chilling in, summer days, any you've got smelly feet. all things i do alot.

i dont care how they look, or what people think, function before looks!
a girl i was working with recently asked why i was looking at the ford jouneo van, "you can get several bikes in, and still sit 3 people" " but it looks horrible" "so?" i said.

and the £30 cost, feck it, i'd pay £50 for them, the ammount of use they have seen
 
twisted_angel said:
I think they are hideous and i tried a friends on after she went on about how comfi they are and there not!..they were too wide so my foot was slipping around and they feel heavy.
:confused:

Crocs? Heavy? :confused:
 
I wear mine with leg warmers. Shoot me.
But seriously, I can't wear normal shoes here, they get f*cked. But I've switched to wellies now it's autumn, the marsh is getting a bit squelchy underfoot.
 
mtbskalover said:
exactly my thoughts :eek:
maybe they were those fakey ones they sell in next and stuff - that are just normal jelly shoes in a crocs-alike shape.

anyway, I have red mary-jane style crocs and I love them, they weight hardly anything and are dead comfy (though not great in the rain, granted - they still grip the ground, by my feet slide around inside them).

I was worried they'd be sweaty, but they aren't at all.

What I would say, though, is that i think walking long distances in them contributed to me fucking my back up over the summer. Certainly, I get back pain much sooner in crocs than i do in my three-strap birkies.
 
Louloubelle said:
They are also cheap and cheerful and don't look like orthopedic shoes.

Not at the prices I see them sold for round here - £25-odd for the cheap clones in town today.

I've also noticed that quite a lot of the adults I see wearing them also display some sort of sign of foot/hip/movement problems.

Maybe the arch support helps there to some degree?

Otherwise, there are only few other types of footwear that actually make my flesh creep but Crocs are by far the worst - Even more than flip-flops & their ilk or other forms of rubber wear.
 
The arch support in Crocs is actually quite minimal (hence butterfly child's observation - indeed, they are not very good for pronators, under or over). Birkenstocks have a bigger arch, in my experience.

I actually wrote to Crocs ages ago before they became trendy, mass-produced, and knocked-off footwear, to suggest that they create a version with better arch support. Shockingly, :rolleyes: , that didn't happen.

***
Thirty quid! Holy heck! You should just order them off the Crocs website if you can and have 'em sent to you. Or wait until someone you know goes to the States. Mind you, with postage, it might end up being the same in the end; but you're paying twice as much as they cost in the US. But, you know, you're not really...because you've got pounds and blah blah. Dollar = poo.
 
i had a look at my boys crocs today and i think ive worked out why he falls over in the rain when he wears them, they have NO grip.
this will be because he only ever travels by wheels so must have worn them down on his scooter or on his bike (he likes to stop by sticking his foot on the wheel :rolleyes:) so that would explain it, they are almost completely smooth i wonder if the materila makes them wear out more quickly
oh well
 
D said:
The arch support in Crocs is actually quite minimal (hence butterfly child's observation - indeed, they are not very good for pronators, under or over). Birkenstocks have a bigger arch, in my experience.

I found Birkies very bad. Soles that mould to my feet? Not a good idea, I need a lot of support under my arches... fucking agony. I actually think Crocs are better than Birkies, in this respect.
 
butterfly child said:
I found Birkies very bad. Soles that mould to my feet? Not a good idea, I need a lot of support under my arches... fucking agony. I actually think Crocs are better than Birkies, in this respect.

Well, I have yet to experience the "molding to my feet" phenomenon - they just seem to be the same as they were when I bought them two months ago.
 
You wouldn't find me dead in a ditch wearing crocs.

Well, not unless some bastard crammed 'em onto my cooling corpse just to laugh at me. They are an abomination.
 
ChrisFilter said:
They're just comfy, brightly coloured shoes. I don't see why people get so worked up about it.. who really gives a fuck? :confused:

EXACTLY. It's that whole "ooh, something's popular, I must hate it" thing. Welcome to Urban - snobby in its own very special way.
 
fucthest8 said:
EXACTLY. It's that whole "ooh, something's popular, I must hate it" thing. Welcome to Urban - snobby in its own very special way.

Indeed!

Crocs are fuckin' cool & i love em :cool:
 
I'd never heard of them before this!

They look like they'd be good for wading about the shallows in on holiday, so your feet don't get impaled on sea urchins
 
Back
Top Bottom