Watched the England innings before going to bed. I suspected that it wouldn't be enough. Morgan is blaming the bowling/fielding, but from what I saw of the batting, they missed a chance to go for 350 in order to guarantee getting 270-280. Balance is in horrible form. Morgan not much better. Bell started in the right way, taking chances, then went into his shell against the might of Dilshan and Matthews.
I just think England don't get the new thinking in 50-over cricket, which has definitely come from t20. Hit a four first ball of the over, then knock it around for singles - a four, four singles and a dot, and that's 8 in the over. Job done. Wrong. Hit a four first ball, then if it's there to hit it, try to hit a six next ball. Forget about what has come the ball before, if you can hit a boundary, go for it, and it's worth taking calculated risks, even early on, even in the middle of the innings.
Buttler gets it. Not sure who else does, tbh. Ali - he takes risks to score. Not sure who else.
The team that wins this WC will not win with careful, risk-averse cricket. And that team will most certainly not be England. They are nowhere near atm. They've been left behind.