Chz
Stark Raving Sane
Given that with adequate cooling they'll both be spending most of their lives at their turbo frequencies... I don't think there's very much in that 200Mhz. The greatly elevated base frequency on the K might be worth it if you're planning on running all cores 100% for long periods, but that's the only real advantage I can see. The most common use that gives such heavy core use is virtualization, and the K is missing a few helpful features that accelerate that. (Intel are bastards about that. I'd love a K with the full feature set turned on.)6700k is 5% faster than the 6700 at stock. Might have to look into changing over to a BeQuiet cooler then.
To be honest, I was thinking of the 6600 and 6600K (which I own) where the turbo frequency is actually identical.
, but somehow I dont think the OP is going to build a super computer for £1000 that will warrant that much cooling.
- I am looking at spending £500 on upgrading my CPU, budget to include a necessary new motherboard and a fan. That's it, I am not after a full rig. I am just upgrading. The £1000 only came into it as a thought in case I have to upgrade my husband's rig too - so that's £500 upgrade budget per PC, not a £1000 budget for 1 new PC.