I went to the Corb exhibition today. I have been thinking of starting a Corbusier crap/not crap thread, which I may well do in the next day or two if I have the time.
I've never been to Chandigarh but if I ever go to India I will certainly want to go there. I know the complex well through drawings and photographs, but would of course be interested to see what it's like in the flesh, and also how it is actually used in reality, which I guess is inevitably not going to match up entirely with what Mr C envisaged.
From a purely sculptural point of view (and, of course, looking good as sculpture is not the only measure against which architecture should be judged) the Chandigarh buildings are possibly my favourites of Corbusier's, and some of my favourite buildings of all time. At the same time I can understand why their appeal is not exactly universal.
Here is one of my favourite bits which is in fact just a sculpture: the "open hand" monument:
I have also heard the anecdote posted by Lang Rabbie above about a misinterpretation of the drawings resulting in the oversized spaces in between the buildings.
By the way I think Corbusier was technically Swiss, although he did spend most of his life based in France.
Interesting, perhaps, to compare Chandigarh with Edwin Lutyens' work in New Dehli, for the British colonial administration, a few decades earlier, and to contemplate to what extent the architecture represents the very different political contexts of each project.
Brix, if you ever go to Chandigarh make sure you post about it here!