Mind you, it has taken 10 years - a whole decade - to even come this close.treelover said:Its interesting how such major public sector strike waves seem to happen on Labours watch, no matter how right wing they are now.
copper got all excited make it an annual day
Hardly likely to attract a reply, is it? Even if your post was coherent ...Das Uberdog said:Porker?

detective-boy said:Hardly likely to attract a reply, is it? Even if your post was coherent ...![]()

You could actually make a reasonable argument that many of the changes over the last few years have been the policing equivalent of how the miners were broken. If the police were threatening militancy because of the dangers to their job, the role of constables in society (as opposed to PCSOs), their ability to provide policing services, etc.) rather than simply looking for a pay rise, they would have far more sympathy from me.MC5 said:Set-up a rival union, say the Union of Democratic Coppers and close down a police station as uneconomical. Infiltrate their flying squads, build up stocks of criminals and starve them back to work.
If it's the Met Federation Annual Open Meeting, they have it the same time every year, which is what makes me think that's what it is.laptop said:Fucking stupid of the Fed to call this one when Parliament isn't sitting
Simple observation - I allow myself that much ...Citizen66 said:Now now DB, no squabbling![]()

detective-boy said:You could actually make a reasonable argument that many of the changes over the last few years have been the policing equivalent of how the miners were broken. If the police were threatening militancy because of the dangers to their job, the role of constables in society (as opposed to PCSOs), their ability to provide policing services, etc.) rather than simply looking for a pay rise, they would have far more sympathy from me.
laptop said:I seem to recall that the last one involved a lobby of Parliament - which involved a lot of cops ambling in an entirely-un-demonstration-like fashion through Parliament Square at a time when demonstrations therein were prohibited![]()
And which, somewhat worryingly, is now calling for them to be given more powers / PPE / training so that "they can do the job properly" ... which "job" would that be? The one PCSOs were intended for, or the one previously done by constables ...agricola said:Sadly though, the Government has allowed PCSOs to be part of a union (the PCS) which - thanks to the rest of the things being done to those who were once termed civvies (the getting-rid of SROs (who in my experience were the hardest working people, in the worst job, in the station) in favour of SPCSO, and the whole way in which MetCall came into being) - could well mean they wouldnt be able to rely on them in a crisis.

That would actually be quite amusing ...bluestreak said:if they do it though we need to show up to line the route and take pictures and whatnot. perhaps with our numbers covered up....


bluestreak said:if they do it though we need to show up to line the route and take pictures and whatnot. perhaps with our numbers covered up....

detective-boy said:And which, somewhat worryingly, is now calling for them to be given more powers / PPE / training so that "they can do the job properly" ... which "job" would that be? The one PCSOs were intended for, or the one previously done by constables ...![]()
butchersapron said:Ian Bone:
In the 1970’s when the SWP was at the height of it’s rank and filism, producing papers for rank’n file social workers,probation officers blah blah some anarchist comrades produced a one off edition of RED SCREW - purporting to be the voice of the rank’n file prison officer and full of absurd demands……….needless to say their mailbag was full of requests from Trots countrywide asking them to speak at meetings………

detective-boy said:And which, somewhat worryingly, is now calling for them to be given more powers / PPE / training so that "they can do the job properly" ... which "job" would that be? The one PCSOs were intended for, or the one previously done by constables ...![]()
Quite a long time, seeing as they don't have batons or CS or (in most cases) even handcuffs at the moment.chymaera said:Any bets on how long it is before PCSO's are issued with Tasers?
The ending of the special (additional) funding will be a major issue - they will have to be paid for out of normal budgets which have not been increased for that purpose.agricola said:True, but it would be interesting to see, given that the Home Office funding for them has either run out or is shortly to do so, how they get on in the current financial situation (which is probably why the job is using them to replace SROs).
detective-boy said:Quite a long time, seeing as they don't have batons or CS or (in most cases) even handcuffs at the moment.
Why limit your scaremongering to Tasers then? Why not go the whole hog and say it's only a matter of time before PCSOs are issue with guns?chymaera said:Only a matter of time in my opinion after a few PCSO's get a kicking whilst on duty.

With any luck it'll not be long till they're issued with P45s, the only 45 I'd like to see a cop (or pseudo-cop) with.detective-boy said:Why limit your scaremongering to Tasers then? Why not go the whole hog and say it's only a matter of time before PCSOs are issue with guns?![]()
There may be nothing in my post about it but I'm perfectly well aware of the extended police family - it's what I now do - I'm a Policing Services Consultant.Strangeways said:You say that, but I see nothing in your post which suggests you've thought about the remainder of the extended policing family.
bluestreak said:80% of cops approve of breaking the law rather than trying to change the law through legal means.
oh the irony.
oh the hypocritical bastards.
fuck 'em.
That's the age-old "justfication" for any privatisation though, isn't it? Nomatter how flawed the public police service may be, I really don't think I'd like to see a privatised one.Strangeways said:TBH it wouldn't be hard to do it better than the current bunch of incompetents.
poster342002 said:That's the age-old "justfication" for any privatisation though, isn't it? Nomatter how flawed the public police service may be, I really don't think I'd like to see a privatised one.

I doubt the old nationalised BT would be comparable to a hypothetical currently nationalised BT. It'd still have access to all the recent technolgy, for instance. The percieved failings of the old BT were probably more a product of the limitations of those times than the fact it was nationalised.YoursTruely said:Depends. Never say never. Would you rather your telephone line and broadband was managed by the GPO or pre-privatised BT?
Edit *opps* - I didn't see the word police in your post. 8![]()