paulhackett
voiced by strother martin
Really? Well maybe some of you should stop talking like tossers then..
how many of me do you think there are?Really? Well maybe some of you should stop talking like tossers then..

how many of me do you think there are?![]()
surely you don't expect someone to make simple distinctions between posters, after all if acab..

if most intelligent people can tell the difference between these cops
![]()
this sort of cop
![]()
and this sort of cop
![]()
then it shouldn't be beyond even your wit to tell the difference between posters who've put their usernames beside their posts.
Right now you look a bit like you're being surly because you got caught out making a stupid comment. Just eff wye eye.awwwww.. annoying isn't it?
i have to deal with the incurably thick at work so i'm used to encountering people like you.awwwww.. annoying isn't it?
i have to deal with the incurably thick at work so i'm used to encountering people like you.
You're way, way, way out of date on that count. Whilst things are not perfect, the problems with rape investigations is no longer them being ignored at the start. Policies and procedures are in place to proactively encourage reports and the vast, vast majority of officers would never even think of going against that. And classifying an allegation of rape as "No Crime" has so many levels of checking (at team, unit, Borough, Headquarters and national level) that it is entirely and utterly justifiable on the evidence that I suspect we are now actually recording as "rape" some things that actually aren't.better than it being covered up entirely or recorded as "no crime", which im sure often happens with "normal" rape a fair bit
You're way, way, way out of date on that count. Whilst things are not perfect, the problems with rape investigations is no longer them being ignored at the start. Policies and procedures are in place to proactively encourage reports and the vast, vast majority of officers would never even think of going against that. And classifying an allegation of rape as "No Crime" has so many levels of checking (at team, unit, Borough, Headquarters and national level) that it is entirely and utterly justifiable on the evidence that I suspect we are now actually recording as "rape" some things that actually aren't.
We really do need to move on from outdated assumptions about what is happening and look at what is really happening now if we are to ever improve the rape investigation and prosecution outcomes.
I don't think Froggie's perception is that unusual. It doesn't matter what changes are made at organisational level if there's a perception/confidence issue that's not being addressed effectively. Chicken and egg innit.
Perception and confidence in the response of the police to an allegation of rape are based on either (a) personal experience (which is still thankfully very low) or (b) what someone tells you (which is where most people get their views from).It doesn't matter what changes are made at organisational level if there's a perception/confidence issue that's not being addressed effectively.
It's pointless the police doing it - they try constantly and no-one believes them.I dont know what can be done by the police in terms of a PR campaingn to address the myths - if that's really what they are?
No. I'm suggesting that rape is underreported because there are still lots of people saying how shite the police response is, don't go anywhere near it, based on extremely out-of-date information.db - are you suggesting that rape is still under-reported because the victims should have kept up with police initiatives and should have had confidence in those?
I only ever leave in the bit that I am responding to. I am not in the habit of listing all the things I either agree with or otherwise have no comment to make about. Sorry if you misinterpreted that as misrepresentation.Edit: and it REALLY pisses me off that you selectively quoted parts of my post that you replied to. I acknowledge that it's a chicken and egg situation, you choose to deselect where I acknowledge that.
snide to the end i see.Sorry if you misinterpreted that as misrepresentation.
And if you think about it for a moment, the police can do nothing else to change perception / confidence if they have made the changes but no-one actually acknowledges them for what they are and identifies only current issues as the only people that the new response is actually experienced by are victims of rape and no matter how good they feel it was, they are hardly likely to want to appear in an advert explaining that!
No. I'm suggesting that rape is underreported because there are still lots of people saying how shite the police response is, don't go anywhere near it, based on extremely out-of-date information.
I only ever leave in the bit that I am responding to. I am not in the habit of listing all the things I either agree with or otherwise have no comment to make about. Sorry if you misinterpreted that as misrepresentation.
snide to the end i see.

I have also heard that GUM and mental health clinics are in trouble as well with the funding issue as well simply because not many people are willing to camapign for better facilities for sexually transmitted diseases and mental health issues and make a public thing of it ... I am not sure how true that is mind.pot bellied pig.
Brilliant explanation from someone that knows (and although things have changed since, they have got significantly better, not worse (e.g. rape examination suites are now attached to hospitals and non-police premises, though the house she describes was always one of the better first attempts at moving it out of police stations).http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/8179353.stm
(the video at the bottom)
(and yes, i know that her experience was almost fifteen years ago, but it's still relevant - especially if practices & responses have improved since then).
) is this:A rape victim said:Fearing police would not believe she had been raped, she was initially determined not to report the attack.
"Up at the hospital, it was actually the nurse who was dressing my injuries who persuaded me to let her call the police and it was the best decision I've ever made," she said.
They constantly provide publicity and try to counter inaccurate publicity ... but the media (rightly) cannot be told what to print, simply do not recognise their importance in communicating accurate information to the people and far, far, far prefer to pick up on someone wittering on about how shite things are (even if they are talking about 25 years ago) rather than accurately reporting how things are now.Further, where they've made efforts with their organisation, how do they let people know, how do they actively change perception built over decades?
That is an issue ... but I fear that sometimes it is exaggerated as an excuse for doing nothing ...I do think that some organisations could do more to work with the police definitely and I agree with you that it needs to be a specific part of the NHS, but on the other hand it might make victims less willing to go for assistance to them if they were going to be "strongly encouraged" to follow it up ...
There are ways and ways of encouraging - it doesn't need to be in your face and it can be applied appropriately to each individual case!There have been very significant changes there too ... though the effect has not been quite so dramatic or obvious as changes in police procedures. Personally I think it is misguided to try and deal with all the victim's concerns (in detail anyway) at the very start. What needs to be stressed is that everything can be taken step by step and there needs to be more overt emphasis on the fact that they (the victim) will remain in control, deciding at each stage whether or not they wish to go any further forward and being provided with accurate information of the pros and cons at each stage. As I said, even if a victim does not wish to take it to Court, there are massive advantages of securing evidence to identify the suspect and providing immediate medical and psychological support to the victim (which, at the end of the day is more important than any prosecution).I think another big problem isn' t with the police, its with stuff like the trial and the fact that people's sex life is brought up in court etc
There are undoubtedly sexist attitudes at work here too - I am aware of very worrying attitudes amongst some groups of young people (not least in the context of criminal youth gangs) but I fear that sexist attitudes are also at play amongst some (mainly male) barristers and judges and that may be why improvements at the Court stage are not happening as they should (though there are some genuine issues about the fairness of trials to the defendant if some of the changes are fully applied).problems" arent just with the police because the police are basically a reflection of society itself ...
Very, I'm afraid ...I am not sure how true that is mind.

They constantly provide publicity and try to counter inaccurate publicity ... but the media (rightly) cannot be told what to print, simply do not recognise their importance in communicating accurate information to the people and far, far, far prefer to pick up on someone wittering on about how shite things are (even if they are talking about 25 years ago) rather than accurately reporting how things are now.
It is ridiculous to expect the police to single handedly deal with this issue just as it is ridiculous to expect them to single handley deal with pretty much any crime problem.
I took it that you were, by the way you seemed to be suggesting that the reason that any improvements made by the police had not been communicated to the people was entirely due to the fault of the police and they should not moan about people not knowing what changes have been made until they make the effort to tell them in this post:Who has expected this, on this thread?
cesare said:And I'm saying that the police have a wider responsibility than to just change their organisational workings and expect everyone to be aware and respond accordingly.
Further, where they've made efforts with their organisation, how do they let people know, how do they actively change perception built over decades? Informing rape crisis centres goes part way, but the vast majority of rape victims don't even get as far as a rape crisis centre.
There's a huge difference between organisational changes and perception/understanding in the population - and that doesn't just apply to rape, as you say, institutionalised racism is another example. Telling people off for either not knowing and/or disbelieving the talk v the walk just alienates further. The police are a public service. Telling the public about how they should think and feel about the police only works if there's confidence.
I took it that you were, by the way you seemed to be suggesting that the reason that any improvements made by the police had not been communicated to the people was entirely due to the fault of the police and they should not moan about people not knowing what changes have been made until they make the effort to tell them in this post:
OK, OK. I believe you. Sorry I misinterpreted your post.That is not the same as singlehandedly expecting them to do anything - is it?