speed humps are a bad idea.
Because; they force cars to slow down and speed up again repeatedly, which leads to way more pollution.
Also, it's bad for the suspension and other parts of the car, which means more money spent on repairs, newer cars and the industry generally
It's also just a generally expensive thing to implement as pointed out by Errols Son.
My thoughts are inclined towards a general strong support for speed cameras. As a driver, I have no probs with speed cameras. I've never been caught on one because....I slow down on stretches where they exist.
It's proven that speed cameras work...they reduce the ave speeds of the majority of cars. The ones that don't get clobbered - funds to the state.
Everyone's a winner. I prefer speed cameras to humps any day. It's overall a much better idea and doesnt have the pitfalls that cameras have.
Also....the 16 mile drive to work I do has precisely zero cameras and zero humps, so I'm laughin'.

Because; they force cars to slow down and speed up again repeatedly, which leads to way more pollution.
Also, it's bad for the suspension and other parts of the car, which means more money spent on repairs, newer cars and the industry generally
It's also just a generally expensive thing to implement as pointed out by Errols Son.
My thoughts are inclined towards a general strong support for speed cameras. As a driver, I have no probs with speed cameras. I've never been caught on one because....I slow down on stretches where they exist.
It's proven that speed cameras work...they reduce the ave speeds of the majority of cars. The ones that don't get clobbered - funds to the state.
Everyone's a winner. I prefer speed cameras to humps any day. It's overall a much better idea and doesnt have the pitfalls that cameras have.
Also....the 16 mile drive to work I do has precisely zero cameras and zero humps, so I'm laughin'.


