MC5 said:Funny you should say that as I knew someone in the 80's who wore this on the back of their denim jacket.![]()
![]()

MC5 said:Funny you should say that as I knew someone in the 80's who wore this on the back of their denim jacket.![]()
![]()

Tony Benn didn't give away free patchesPigeon said:Cast yr mind back to early 80s...how many young kids walked around with the words "Tony Benn" on the backs of their jackets?
MC5 said:Funny you should say that as I knew someone in the 80's who wore this on the back of their denim jacket.![]()
![]()


Who cares?Pigeon said:Cast yr mind back to early 80s...how many young kids walked around with the words "Tony Benn" on the backs of their jackets?
ddraig said:not sure sorry, think there may have been a steve as well, just knew him as biffa (or guv to his face)
biffa was the tallest iirc, or second to col anyway.
Yes, that sounds familiar. Little wankers at the front with black flags exercising their right to fuck up everybody else's meeting.Sir Belchalot said:I don't remember any mates who were into CND despite Crass championing them. Remember being at one of their demos in Hyde Park and most of the speakers were being heckled by the anarchos.
Donna Ferentes said:Yes, that sounds familiar. Little wankers at the front with black flags exercising their right to fuck up everybody else's meeting.
Sir Belchalot said:I don't remember any mates who were into CND despite Crass championing them. Remember being at one of their demos in Hyde Park and most of the speakers were being heckled by the anarchos.
Iirc loads of people got nicked after having a contrived 'riot' in Oxford Street after buggering off from the demo.
Dubversion said:that was later, i think - 83/84 when the black block got stronger. I was at that demo.. doesn't mean the point about the relationship between CND, Crass and membership wasn't true earlier in the decade.

And Conflict kept it there.RubberBuccaneer said:Bottom line is they were influential to a lot of people, maybe not on the scale of a political party but certainly brought anarchism out of the history books for me![]()
I really doubt that a few people on this particular site constitutes either a representative sample or a reliable one.Paulie Tandoori said:Blimey, you've got out of bed on the wrong side, all week, on this thread aintcha?
And you maintain that Crass weren't very influential, despite many people coming on here and repeatedly saying that they became much more politically aware as a direct result of the whole Crass/anarcho punk movement,
Donna Ferentes said:As I've pointed out several times, it's a part of society which persistently overestimates its own extent and influence and I believe I've given some reasons as to why I think so.
Donna Ferentes said:People who do this are not, I'm afraid, relaible witnesses on the subject of who was influential generally - only on what influenced them.


Wrong and wrong but don't let a good opportunity to exercise your ideological preoccupations get in the way, hmmm?laptop said:I also think that you have an ideological (and, if I remember rightly, that at the time you had an organisational) commitment to downplaying its influence.
Donna Ferentes said:Now the trouble is, I would have to ask myself questions like:
1. if Crass were so influential, how come they were so litle mentioned in the mainstream media? After all, is it not the normal habit of the mainstream press to pick up on such things, if only to produce a distroted and hostile version of them for idelogical purposes?
2. is it really likely that a punk band had more political influence than leading socialist figures whose views were sought, reported and distorted in the mainstream media practically every day of the week?
3. is there not a tendency on the political fringes (for reasons which I have sought to explore above) to overestimnate the important of what the political fringe does and has done?
Yes, but that's the music press. Who cover music.Paulie Tandoori said:1) The mainstream music press denigrated and undermined virtually everything that Crass and co did, repreatedly - as is noted above, Bushell in particular did his best to rubbish their ideals, the politics, the records, the labels, etc.
Paulie Tandoori said:2) depends who you talk to dunnit. There's quite a few here who claim direct and indirect influences arising from Crass and co, in terms of their thinking, their politics, their ideologies, etc. And I bet these people know a load more who were similarly influenced. Crass were subject to debate in Parliament after Mother of a Thousand Dead (or Sheep Farming) single.
Paulie Tandoori said:he people who were/are influenced by the ideas and ideology of Crass are much more likely to have become involved in alternative political movements and lifestyles, outside of the mainstream
And so they do, which is why personal testimonials, while useful in some respects, should not be the basis for making historical judgements.Paulie Tandoori said:3) socialist, anarchist, even the bleeding tories do this - your point is? Everyone like to puff themselves up a bit, innit?
Donna Ferentes said:Yes, but that's the music press. Who cover music.

rocketman said:Crass where one of the most influential acts from the scene ever to emerge, they set in motion ways of looking at things, and a DIY aesthetic (borrowed from Black Flag), that was widely adopted by their peers. Mainstream press ignored them becuase of the politics of the time (Thatcher and so on).
iROBOT said:My mate djed at one of Conflicts members birthday bash and almost got killed for playing Blondie!!
doh!I'm not sure what your problem is here. The music press cover music: they can therefore be expected to cover even relatively obscure acts in that field. The arts press would do the same thing: therefore they might very well get extremely het up about a controversy which while important in that field, had little influence outside it.Paulie Tandoori said:You said "mainstream media" - since when did the music press fall outside this definition?
Donna Ferentes said:I'm not sure what your problem is here. The music press cover music: they can therefore be expected to cover even relatively obscure acts in that field. The arts press would do the same thing: therefore they might very well get extremely het up about a controversy which while important in that field, had little influence outside it.
)No, I can deny that they were covered by other than specialist publications that would necessarily have covered them. I don't think that's hard and your argument is not a good one.Paulie Tandoori said:You're wriggling with your own definitions now mate. You asked why were they ignored by mainstream media when they weren't - we could argue all day about whether Smash Hits was more mainstream than the NME, but you can't deny the "mainstream media", in some form, covered them.
If they'd been influencing people then the papers would have perceived them as a threat. The fact that they did not, though not conclusive (one can scarcely be conclusive in these things) is not helpful to the case for their significance.Paulie Tandoori said:Further, taking the above to a logical extreme, the fact that the Mirror and Scum weren't making them front page headlines every week somehow undermines their (Crass) influence on little spiky-headed punksters making their first tenative steps into the brave world of political thinking beyond the traditional Lab/Tory/Lib scenario. Is that the only way to measure political influence, the number of column inches recieved every week? I rather think not.