Well, I enjoyed it and I watched them in order when they came out although didn't get to see the first one at the cinema. I think the first 3 are all very entertaining. The fourth was alright but getting a bit silly. Not seen the latest one yet.post 55![]()
Die hard 2 had...
1 shit bad guys - they couldn't even decide whether to make them foreign or American, couldn't be bothered to explain their motivations, and certainly couldn't be bothered to give them any personality.
2 much fewer decent 1 liners for Bruce willis to dish out. A couple of crackers, and a whole load that just didn't work.
3 poorly designed and edited action sequences - as expensive as they must have been to film, very few of the fights work particularly well. The gun fight in the under construction terminal is the one exception.
4 an obsession with reminding us that it was a sequel to the previous film. So old characters show up for the most tenuous of reasons for 2 minutes, Bruce ends up in his vest again, he keeps moaning that it always happens to him at Christmas, narrative echoes too complicated, boring and obvious to bother explaining. The scriptwriter/s clearly had a brief "make sure people know they are watching a sequel".
It's the weakest in the series.
The fifth one is not only the worst film of the franchise; it is one of the worst films I've ever seen. Truly diabolical.It's the weakest in the series, IMO, although I've heard number 5 really sucks.
Yes, he is good....Steve Buscemi ftw
Steve Buscemi ftw
Was he a "child" killer? I mean we know he was a killer but do we know he killed kids?Is there another film that manages to make a child killer into the character everyone is rooting for?
Was he a "child" killer? I mean we know he was a killer but do we know he killed kids?
Yes I recall that bit but his using the word "girl" did not make me think of children. My mum used to say she was having some girls round and the next thing you knew the house was filled with 50 year old women!As I recall he wore one girl's head as a hat driving through several states.
No need to "ffs" me Cid.. I am only making a point ffs .. He was portrayed as a psycho killer so basically my understanding was no one was safe .. including little girls.Any why did you think they include the scene where he has tea with the girl? ffs welty.
As I recall he wore one girl's head as a hat driving through several states. And why did you think they include the scene where he has tea with the girl? ffs welty.
Wikipedia just says ... "and infamous serial killer Garland Greene, the "Marietta Mangler."
This is one of those urban arguments that does not really matter.Cage's character asks him to spare the details, it's his daughter's birthday etc... He's definitely killed at least one kid.
Yes there is no doubt he was a bad dude ..To be honest, anyone who's earned the nickname "Marietta Mangler" probably has a rather murky history.
Is there another film that manages to make a child killer into the character everyone is rooting for?
Oh, I think it's excellent because it's so over-blown. Tongue firmly in cheek. It is directed by John Woo, you know![]()
It is the best action film ever made. Next to 'The Rock' of course
its quite remarkable to see a bay film involving Nic Cage actually come good just on the strength of Connery, explosions and Ed Harris