danny la rouge
Ninja swords for all disabled people
What are you on about?
Ah, open season on people experiencing mental ill-health. Cool.anyone with that mind set needs mental health care. Long term mental health care...
Ah, open season on people experiencing mental ill-health. Cool.
Let me know when Take The Piss Out Of A Dyslexic Day comes round again.
I think this is out of order:right because stating some one has a messianic complex and they need professional help is declearing open season...
fuck me you are more obtuse than usual who trod on your cock?
when are you going back on the anti pyshcotics...
I think this is out of order:
That's not obtuse; it's a clear statement.
Is it OK if I remember that for the future?I think you need to grow a pair... but hey each to their own...
Ben Goldacre did a how-to in the Guardian a while back. All you need is a scanner and some Gummy Bears.
yes you are right you and your pals are the ONLY people to be aware of this happening and the work you do inlcuding the action you take is VITAL to preventing further errosion of liberty...
The only person banging on and on about 'loons' in this thread is you.
A spokeswoman for the NPIA added: "It will be up to each police authority to assess the benefits and see how many they want. Early indications are that the benefits will be huge."
Who is selling these things to the government?
Well, senior police officers, for a start.
THE American manufacturer of Taser, the controversial stun gun, gave the exclusive British distribution rights to a senior serving police officer who helped win Home Office approval for the weapon.
Inspector Peter Boatman had a 50% share in a company that sold Tasers at the same time as devising Britains first police training programme for the use of weapons.
Boatman was in charge of assessing the merits of Taser as head of operational training for Northamptonshire police and was regarded as an impartial expert on the weapon.
Since he left the force a little more than three years ago, his firm has provided 1,500 Tasers worth about £1m to 20 British police forces. It is the exclusive UK distributor for the US company, Taser International.
Disclosure of the apparent conflict of interest comes after Taser International, the US manufacturer, was accused of providing American police officers with share options potentially worth $1m.
Police repression is a dirty business all right, but lucrativet:
Companies House records show that Boatman took a 50% stake in a start-up company, Pro-Tect Systems, in December 2000. He became a director of the firm on December 5 and resigned three weeks later, on December 27, but held on to his stake in the company.
In February 2001, Pro-Tect received the Taser contract for the UK. Within two months Boatman was acting as an adviser to the Home Office on whether to issue Tasers to British officers. He was regarded as a national and international expert on Tasers, Chris Fox, the former chief constable of Northamptonshire, said yesterday.
In December 2001, three months after the Home Office approved trial imports, Boatman publicly rebutted claims by Police Federation officers that Tasers could be dangerous. Boatman wrote with sadness to Police Review that this technology is very effective — more than any other technique, device or equipment for establishing control over violent and dangerous subjects.
He retired from the police on April 16, 2002. Two days later he was installed as chairman of Pro-Tect Systems. His fellow founding director and friend, Kevin Coles, had been running the firm in the meantime.
This post by a Guardian readers was interesting and deeply worrying.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article584499.ece
Just eight years?I'd probably support something like this if the police hadn't spent the last eight years treating innocent people like criminals. As it is, seriously scary.

Ah, open season on people experiencing mental ill-health. Cool. Let me know when Take The Piss Out Of A Dyslexic Day comes round again.
What's wrong with tasers? They've probably quite saved a few lives.
In case you aint being sarky, they've ended a few hundred.
http://www.amnestyusa.org/us-human-rights/page.do?id=1011100
What's wrong with tasers? They've probably quite saved a few lives.
(runs and hides from person who found the story deeply worrying, and all his concerned Guardian reading chums!)
Uh....how on earth did you miss the huge conflict of interest?

I read that, but I have to confess that I'm not tremendously shocked.
Unlike his wife.
No doubt if he broke any laws he will be prosecuted and punished in due course. I'm sure that kind of thing won't happen with the introduction of fingerprinting machines, which may well save a lot of inconvenience for people who would otherwise have to spend hours in police stations. Slippery slope, though.
Maybe, but only in foreign parts.
ETA - that sounds a bit crude and unserious and that's not what I meant.
There have been no deaths as far as I know through legitimate use of tasers in the UK. Things are different in North America. That has to be down to proper management of the use of these weapons, which like incapacitating gas are an effective and non-lethal means of subduing a violent suspect, and thereby it is likely that lives have been saved. We ought to reflect on the fact that British cops seem to do it so much better.
I read that, but I have to confess that I'm not tremendously shocked.
Unlike his wife.
No doubt if he broke any laws he will be prosecuted and punished in due course. I'm sure that kind of thing won't happen with the introduction of fingerprinting machines, which may well save a lot of inconvenience for people who would otherwise have to spend hours in police stations. Slippery slope, though.
Jesus wept tears of hate and boiling piss. The only thing that saves you is the last sentence.

Are you angling for a career in satire?
Now let me see.I dont think you've read the whole thread then.