kyser_soze
Hawking's Angry Eyebrow
what we are witnessing is the rise of a proto -globalised-commercial-fuedalism
I said something similar about 3 months back about entering an age of corporate feudalism and was roundly shouted down for it...
what we are witnessing is the rise of a proto -globalised-commercial-fuedalism
I said something similar about 3 months back about entering an age of corporate feudalism and was roundly shouted down for it...
Like that?But that's idiot nonsense.


Probably is in the marxist definitions. Meanwhile in the real world, both systems have/had many different attributes - often being different attributes to those claimed by/for them. So I'd say it's complicatedCapitalist feudalism anyone? Do you even know what these terms refer to? Feudalism by definition is non-capitalist. Wouldn't you say BA?

But that's idiot nonsense.
Capitalist feudalism anyone?
That's a good point, and one worth pursuing.It's not impossible. What's emerging around the globe doesn't look like "normal" capitalism at all. For one thing, it seems to be gradually freeing itself (via technology and other methods) of it's "gravedigger" - the working classes - which are being shrunken and increasingly marginalised in terms of numbers and usefullness to the system. I know you don't agree here, as we've spoken about this before.
Some evidence would be nice. Even just a little bit, as this all sounds like utterly groundless speculation to meIt's not impossible. What's emerging around the globe doesn't look like "normal" capitalism at all. For one thing, it seems to be gradually freeing itself (via technology and other methods) of it's "gravedigger" - the working classes - which are being shrunken and increasingly marginalised in terms of numbers and usefullness to the system.
Another is how remarkably little capitalism produces anymore - instead, vast profits are made simply by shunting money around various markets.
I know you don't agree here, as we've spoken about this before.
(via technology and other methods) of it's "gravedigger" - the working classes - which are being shrunken and increasingly marginalised in terms of numbers and usefullness to the system.
Some evidence would be nice. Even just a little bit, as this all sounds like utterly groundless speculation to me
Only in long established capitalist nations - the w/c jobs have all be farmed out to cheaper labour markets, so the gravedigger is still with us, just not in the UK anymore.
By christ, there's some confused bollocks on here now
People, define your terms. Can anyone explain what capitalist-feudalism is?
By christ, there's some confused bollocks on here now
People, define your terms. Can anyone explain what capitalist-feudalism is?
Can someone not take a misquoted quote and use it in the first place.
I said corporate fuedalism, not capitalist fuedalism - entities acting and behaving in the same way as feudal kingdoms within the greater superstructure of capitalism - examples would be indentured labourers and those 'guest workers' who have their passports taken from them, effectively removing their ability to move around; the 00000s of illegeal Mexican immigrants and convicts in the US on 'workfare' schemes (not to mention the countless 00s of Chinese prisoners who are essentially a huge pool of slave labour).
Not really. I said evidence, not speculationLess and less manufacturing, bigger and bigger roles for finance capitalism (capitalism's "beaurocracy class", if you like), never ending layoffs (coupled with tighter and tighter restrictions on benefits) all over the place, fewer concentrations of workers in each workplace - yet larger numbers of adminitrators and managers ...
Good enough for a kickoff?
I still don't see why any of that is not capitalist (apart from the eg of China, which isn't capitalist).Can someone not take a misquoted quote and use it in the first place.
I said corporate fuedalism, not capitalist fuedalism - entities acting and behaving in the same way as feudal kingdoms within the greater superstructure of capitalism - examples would be indentured labourers and those 'guest workers' who have their passports taken from them, effectively removing their ability to move around; the 00000s of illegeal Mexican immigrants and convicts in the US on 'workfare' schemes (not to mention the countless 00s of Chinese prisoners who are essentially a huge pool of slave labour).
By christ, there's some confused bollocks on here now
People, define your terms. Can anyone explain what capitalist-feudalism is?
I don't really buy the idea that the working class is shrinking, or that we're producing any less than we ever did. Surely more commodities are in circulation now than ever before, and they aren't all being made by robots. Production has has just been outsourced to poorer countries. And if this is true, it follows that the working class has to be envisaged as a transnational social grouping. Just because it isn't so visible to 'us' doesn't mean it's not there.It's not impossible. What's emerging around the globe doesn't look like "normal" capitalism at all. For one thing, it seems to be gradually freeing itself (via technology and other methods) of it's "gravedigger" - the working classes - which are being shrunken and increasingly marginalised in terms of numbers and usefullness to the system.
Another is how remarkably little capitalism produces anymore - instead, vast profits are made simply by shunting money around various markets.
I know you don't agree here, as we've spoken about this before.
Yes and no. There working classes are still here but they don't work in manual jobs so much any moreSurely the working classes have been exported to India, China, etc, with some of the same conditions we faced in the 19/early 20th C
I was under the impression that there is no private property in the means of production and that the vast bulk of the economy is bureacratically planned.I also think it's wrong to say that China isn't capitalist. Yes, it has a lot of state involvement in its capitalism, but then so do the US and UK, whatever they like to claim - the difference is only one of degree. In some ways it is more capitalist than here - healthcare provision is market-based for example.
Yeah, that's right, cos if I was campaigning in my locale I'd be talking about EXACTLY the same things as I have done hereThe thread started as a discussion about how the 'left' should replace NuLab in the next couple of years .....
... & goes on to demonstrate why this isn't going to happen...![]()

I was under the impression that there is no private property in the means of production...