Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Coen Brothers: No Country for Old Men

You need a glossary for all the geographical features described - I found it really hard to imagine the landscapes he describes so often.
 
PieEye said:
I did geography, me, so I totally know what he's talking about.
A level? I did GSCE and didn't have a scooby what he was on about - and I can't speak Spanish either and there's an awful lot of Spanish spoken in his books
 
But you just know what they're talking about I found - and that's what's really strange. I can hardly speak any but it doesn't seem to matter at all.
 
PieEye said:
But you just know what they're talking about I found - and that's what's really strange. I can hardly speak any but it doesn't seem to matter at all.
I felt like I was missing out
 
Saw it last night on the main screen at the big cinema in Glasgow- absolutely loved it. I thought the ending was superb, first time for a while I've seen a film that I wanted to discuss afterwards (in more detail than "The special effects were nice", anyway)
 
saw it tonight and I want my money back.

Bleak, souless, arty, shite.

I thought it was *ok*.

Really don't get why so many usually-sensible people are gushing all over it.
Has it really been that long since a film with a decent bad guy has been released?
 
I finally got round to seeing this. I don't know, it had some fine things but I was really disappointed with it. I love the Coens, but this just seemed to be an arid exercise. I don't get it, and I don't get the Bardem performance. It's good, but in no way 'great'.

How is this remotely as good as Fargo, Miller's Crossing or even Blood Simple?

:(
 
I finally got round to seeing this. I don't know, it had some fine things but I was really disappointed with it. I love the Coens, but this just seemed to be an arid exercise. I don't get it, and I don't get the Bardem performance. It's good, but in no way 'great'.

How is this remotely as good as Fargo, Miller's Crossing or even Blood Simple?

:(


Agree. There recent work got a bit of a critical panning and I think they tried to do something arty and enigmatic (or cold and confusing to the likes of me) that would have the critics slavering.
 
I finally got round to seeing this. I don't know, it had some fine things but I was really disappointed with it. I love the Coens, but this just seemed to be an arid exercise. I don't get it, and I don't get the Bardem performance. It's good, but in no way 'great'.

How is this remotely as good as Fargo, Miller's Crossing or even Blood Simple?

:(

fully agree with the ^^^

... IMHO the film was VERY atmospheric, the acting was brilliant, tommy lee was great, the scary psycho was one of the most terrifying characters I've seen. The sense of stumbling into something much bigger than yourself and how events spiral out of control was nicely done

anton "the ultimate badass" (nice line btw :D) was simply terrifying when he was in the gas station and flipping the coin .... :eek:

the landscapes were outstanding, beautiful.

The direction of the film seemed to completely fall apart when Llewelyn gets killed ... it just seemed to fizzle out. The powers in the background controlling the events weren't fully developed for my liking and seemed to hint at control without exploring it further and giving a bit more depth.

woody harrelson's character was quite poor IMHO.

some really good scenes though - Llewelyn talking with the USA border cop was hilarious, tommy lee and his fellow cop, Llewelyn and Carson Wells talking about welding. Nice little dialogue points there I thought.

Overall the film disappointed me, it looked lovely, the characters were great but the film lost direction after Llewelyn was killed (not fully explained and explored for my liking)... 6/10

... funnily enough after watching, I am Legend, I was MORE impressed by that film! I know I am legend isn't in the same pretentious league, but it did what it said on the tin - it was a more "complete" film, it seemed more coherent etc.
 
from holy moly:

In the novel 'No Country For Old Men' (but not in the movie), Sheriff Bell says of the dope-dealers, "Here a while back in San Antonio they shot and killed a federal judge."

The author set the story in 1980. In 1979, in San Antonio, Federal Judge John Howland Wood was shot and killed by rifle fire by a Texas freelance contract killer named Charles Harrelson.

Actor Woody Harrelson (Carson Wells in the movie) is his son.

Charles Harrelson was sentenced to two life sentences for the murder of Federal Judge John Howland Wood on the orders of drug dealer Jimmy Chagra, who reportedly paid him $250,000. Harrelson has claimed to be one of the "hobos" taken away from "the grassy knoll" right after the shooting of John F. Kennedy.

Harrelson died on March 15th, 2007 in a federal super-maximum prison in Colorado.
 
Back
Top Bottom